Cargando…

Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain

The aim of this study was the analysis of the effect of a learned increase in the dissociation between the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and the left posterior insula (pInsL) on pain intensity and unpleasantness and the contribution of each region to the effect, exploring the possibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rance, Mariela, Ruttorf, Michaela, Nees, Frauke, Schad, Lothar R., Flor, Herta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00357
_version_ 1782339648386760704
author Rance, Mariela
Ruttorf, Michaela
Nees, Frauke
Schad, Lothar R.
Flor, Herta
author_facet Rance, Mariela
Ruttorf, Michaela
Nees, Frauke
Schad, Lothar R.
Flor, Herta
author_sort Rance, Mariela
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was the analysis of the effect of a learned increase in the dissociation between the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and the left posterior insula (pInsL) on pain intensity and unpleasantness and the contribution of each region to the effect, exploring the possibility to influence the perception of pain with neurofeedback methods. We trained ten healthy subjects to increase the difference in the blood oxygenation level-dependent response between the rACC and pInsL to painful electric stimuli. Subjects learned to increase the dissociation with either the rACC (state 1) or the pInsL (state 2) being higher. For feedback we subtracted the signal of one region from the other and provided feedback in four conditions with six trials each yielding two different states: [rACC—pInsL increase (state 1), rACC—pInsL decrease (state 2), pInsL—rACC increase (state 2), pInsL—rACC decrease (state 1)]. Significant changes in the dissociation from trial one to six were seen in all conditions. There were significant changes from trial one to six in the pInsL in three of the four conditions, the rACC showed no significant change. Pain intensity or unpleasantness ratings were unrelated to the dissociation between the regions and the activation in each region. Learning success in the conditions did not significantly correlate and there was no significant correlation between the two respective conditions of one state, i.e., learning to achieve a specific state is not a stable ability. The pInsL seems to be the driving force behind changes in the learned dissociation between the regions. Despite successful differential modulation of activation in areas responsive to the painful stimulus, no corresponding changes in the perception of pain intensity or unpleasantness emerged. Learning to induce different states of dissociation between the areas is not a stable ability since success did not correlate overall or between two conditions of the the same state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4197653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41976532014-10-30 Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain Rance, Mariela Ruttorf, Michaela Nees, Frauke Schad, Lothar R. Flor, Herta Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience The aim of this study was the analysis of the effect of a learned increase in the dissociation between the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and the left posterior insula (pInsL) on pain intensity and unpleasantness and the contribution of each region to the effect, exploring the possibility to influence the perception of pain with neurofeedback methods. We trained ten healthy subjects to increase the difference in the blood oxygenation level-dependent response between the rACC and pInsL to painful electric stimuli. Subjects learned to increase the dissociation with either the rACC (state 1) or the pInsL (state 2) being higher. For feedback we subtracted the signal of one region from the other and provided feedback in four conditions with six trials each yielding two different states: [rACC—pInsL increase (state 1), rACC—pInsL decrease (state 2), pInsL—rACC increase (state 2), pInsL—rACC decrease (state 1)]. Significant changes in the dissociation from trial one to six were seen in all conditions. There were significant changes from trial one to six in the pInsL in three of the four conditions, the rACC showed no significant change. Pain intensity or unpleasantness ratings were unrelated to the dissociation between the regions and the activation in each region. Learning success in the conditions did not significantly correlate and there was no significant correlation between the two respective conditions of one state, i.e., learning to achieve a specific state is not a stable ability. The pInsL seems to be the driving force behind changes in the learned dissociation between the regions. Despite successful differential modulation of activation in areas responsive to the painful stimulus, no corresponding changes in the perception of pain intensity or unpleasantness emerged. Learning to induce different states of dissociation between the areas is not a stable ability since success did not correlate overall or between two conditions of the the same state. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4197653/ /pubmed/25360092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00357 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rance, Ruttorf, Nees, Schad and Flor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rance, Mariela
Ruttorf, Michaela
Nees, Frauke
Schad, Lothar R.
Flor, Herta
Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
title Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
title_full Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
title_fullStr Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
title_full_unstemmed Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
title_short Neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
title_sort neurofeedback of the difference in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior insular cortex: two functionally connected areas in the processing of pain
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00357
work_keys_str_mv AT rancemariela neurofeedbackofthedifferenceinactivationoftheanteriorcingulatecortexandposteriorinsularcortextwofunctionallyconnectedareasintheprocessingofpain
AT ruttorfmichaela neurofeedbackofthedifferenceinactivationoftheanteriorcingulatecortexandposteriorinsularcortextwofunctionallyconnectedareasintheprocessingofpain
AT neesfrauke neurofeedbackofthedifferenceinactivationoftheanteriorcingulatecortexandposteriorinsularcortextwofunctionallyconnectedareasintheprocessingofpain
AT schadlotharr neurofeedbackofthedifferenceinactivationoftheanteriorcingulatecortexandposteriorinsularcortextwofunctionallyconnectedareasintheprocessingofpain
AT florherta neurofeedbackofthedifferenceinactivationoftheanteriorcingulatecortexandposteriorinsularcortextwofunctionallyconnectedareasintheprocessingofpain