Cargando…
Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
PURPOSE: Four cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (DC) resulted in superior survival than doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in the treatment of early breast cancer. The original study reported a 5% incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) recommending prophylactic antibiotics with no granulocyte colony-sti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25330205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107273 |
_version_ | 1782339688926806016 |
---|---|
author | Yerushalmi, Rinat Goldvaser, Hadar Sulkes, Aaron Ben-Aharon, Irit Hendler, Daniel Neiman, Victoria Ciuraru, Noa Beatrice Bonilla, Luisa Amit, Limor Zer, Alona Granot, Tal Rizel, Shulamith Stemmer, Salomon M. |
author_facet | Yerushalmi, Rinat Goldvaser, Hadar Sulkes, Aaron Ben-Aharon, Irit Hendler, Daniel Neiman, Victoria Ciuraru, Noa Beatrice Bonilla, Luisa Amit, Limor Zer, Alona Granot, Tal Rizel, Shulamith Stemmer, Salomon M. |
author_sort | Yerushalmi, Rinat |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Four cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (DC) resulted in superior survival than doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in the treatment of early breast cancer. The original study reported a 5% incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) recommending prophylactic antibiotics with no granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The worldwide adoption of this protocol yielded several reports on substantially higher rates of FN events. We explored the use of growth factor (GF) support on days 8 and 12 of the cycle with the original DC protocol. METHODS: Our study included all consecutive patients with stages I–II breast cancer who were treated with the DC protocol at the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center (Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel) from April, 2007 to March, 2012. Patient, tumor characteristics, and toxicity were reported. Results: In total, 123 patients received the DC regimen. Median age was 60 years, (range, 25–81 years). Thirty-three patients (26.8%) were aged 65 years and older. Most of the women (87%) adhered to the planned G-CSF protocol (days 8 &12). 96% of the patients completed the 4 planned cycles of chemotherapy. Six patients (5%) had dose reductions, 6 (5%) had treatment delays due to non-medical reasons. Thirteen patients (10.6%) experienced at least one event of FN (3 patients had 2 events), all requiring hospitalization. Eight patients (6.5%) required additional support with G-CSF after the first chemotherapy cycle, 7 because of FN and one due to neutropenia and diarrhea. IN CONCLUSION: Primary prophylactic G-CSF support on days 8 and 12 of the cycle provides a tolerable option to deliver the DC protocol. Our results are in line with other retrospective protocols using longer schedules of GF support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4198090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41980902014-10-21 Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis Yerushalmi, Rinat Goldvaser, Hadar Sulkes, Aaron Ben-Aharon, Irit Hendler, Daniel Neiman, Victoria Ciuraru, Noa Beatrice Bonilla, Luisa Amit, Limor Zer, Alona Granot, Tal Rizel, Shulamith Stemmer, Salomon M. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Four cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (DC) resulted in superior survival than doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in the treatment of early breast cancer. The original study reported a 5% incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) recommending prophylactic antibiotics with no granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The worldwide adoption of this protocol yielded several reports on substantially higher rates of FN events. We explored the use of growth factor (GF) support on days 8 and 12 of the cycle with the original DC protocol. METHODS: Our study included all consecutive patients with stages I–II breast cancer who were treated with the DC protocol at the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center (Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel) from April, 2007 to March, 2012. Patient, tumor characteristics, and toxicity were reported. Results: In total, 123 patients received the DC regimen. Median age was 60 years, (range, 25–81 years). Thirty-three patients (26.8%) were aged 65 years and older. Most of the women (87%) adhered to the planned G-CSF protocol (days 8 &12). 96% of the patients completed the 4 planned cycles of chemotherapy. Six patients (5%) had dose reductions, 6 (5%) had treatment delays due to non-medical reasons. Thirteen patients (10.6%) experienced at least one event of FN (3 patients had 2 events), all requiring hospitalization. Eight patients (6.5%) required additional support with G-CSF after the first chemotherapy cycle, 7 because of FN and one due to neutropenia and diarrhea. IN CONCLUSION: Primary prophylactic G-CSF support on days 8 and 12 of the cycle provides a tolerable option to deliver the DC protocol. Our results are in line with other retrospective protocols using longer schedules of GF support. Public Library of Science 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4198090/ /pubmed/25330205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107273 Text en © 2014 Yerushalmi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yerushalmi, Rinat Goldvaser, Hadar Sulkes, Aaron Ben-Aharon, Irit Hendler, Daniel Neiman, Victoria Ciuraru, Noa Beatrice Bonilla, Luisa Amit, Limor Zer, Alona Granot, Tal Rizel, Shulamith Stemmer, Salomon M. Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis |
title | Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full | Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_fullStr | Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_short | Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (DC) with Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) on Days 8 &12 in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_sort | adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (dc) with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) on days 8 &12 in breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25330205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yerushalmirinat adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT goldvaserhadar adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT sulkesaaron adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT benaharonirit adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT hendlerdaniel adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT neimanvictoria adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT ciurarunoabeatrice adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT bonillaluisa adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT amitlimor adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT zeralona adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT granottal adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT rizelshulamith adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT stemmersalomonm adjuvantdocetaxelandcyclophosphamidedcwithprophylacticgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorgcsfondays812inbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectiveanalysis |