Cargando…
White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger
The fundamental causes of animal-vehicle collisions are unclear, particularly at the level of animal detection of approaching vehicles and decision-making. Deer-vehicle collisions (DVCs) are especially costly in terms of animal mortality, property damage, and safety. Over one year, we exposed free-r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109988 |
_version_ | 1782339705134645248 |
---|---|
author | Blackwell, Bradley F. Seamans, Thomas W. DeVault, Travis L. |
author_facet | Blackwell, Bradley F. Seamans, Thomas W. DeVault, Travis L. |
author_sort | Blackwell, Bradley F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fundamental causes of animal-vehicle collisions are unclear, particularly at the level of animal detection of approaching vehicles and decision-making. Deer-vehicle collisions (DVCs) are especially costly in terms of animal mortality, property damage, and safety. Over one year, we exposed free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to vehicle approach under low ambient light conditions, from varying start distances, and vehicle speeds from 20 km/h to approximately 90 km/h. We modeled flight response by deer to an approaching vehicle and tested four hypotheses: 1) flight-initiation distance (FID) would correlate positively with start distance (indicating a spatial margin of safety); 2) deer would react to vehicle speed using a temporal margin of safety; 3) individuals reacting at greater FIDs would be more likely to cross the path of the vehicle; and 4) crossings would correlate positively with start distance, approach speed, and distance to concealing/refuge cover. We examined deer responses by quantiles. Median FID was 40% of start distance, irrespective of start distance or approach speed. Converting FID to time-to-collision (TTC), median TTC was 4.6 s, but uncorrelated with start distance or approach speed. The likelihood of deer crossing in front of the vehicle was not associated with greater FIDs or other explanatory variables. Because deer flight response to vehicle approach was highly variable, DVCs should be more likely with increasing vehicle speeds because of lower TTCs for a given distance. For road sections characterized by frequent DVCs, we recommend estimating TTC relative to vehicle speed and candidate line-of-sight distances adjusted downward by (1-P), where P represents our findings for the proportion of start distance by which >75% of deer had initiated flight. Where road design or conservation goals limit effectiveness of line-of-sight maintenance, we suggest incorporation of roadway obstacles that force drivers to slow vehicles, in addition to posting advisory speed limits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4198184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41981842014-10-21 White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger Blackwell, Bradley F. Seamans, Thomas W. DeVault, Travis L. PLoS One Research Article The fundamental causes of animal-vehicle collisions are unclear, particularly at the level of animal detection of approaching vehicles and decision-making. Deer-vehicle collisions (DVCs) are especially costly in terms of animal mortality, property damage, and safety. Over one year, we exposed free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to vehicle approach under low ambient light conditions, from varying start distances, and vehicle speeds from 20 km/h to approximately 90 km/h. We modeled flight response by deer to an approaching vehicle and tested four hypotheses: 1) flight-initiation distance (FID) would correlate positively with start distance (indicating a spatial margin of safety); 2) deer would react to vehicle speed using a temporal margin of safety; 3) individuals reacting at greater FIDs would be more likely to cross the path of the vehicle; and 4) crossings would correlate positively with start distance, approach speed, and distance to concealing/refuge cover. We examined deer responses by quantiles. Median FID was 40% of start distance, irrespective of start distance or approach speed. Converting FID to time-to-collision (TTC), median TTC was 4.6 s, but uncorrelated with start distance or approach speed. The likelihood of deer crossing in front of the vehicle was not associated with greater FIDs or other explanatory variables. Because deer flight response to vehicle approach was highly variable, DVCs should be more likely with increasing vehicle speeds because of lower TTCs for a given distance. For road sections characterized by frequent DVCs, we recommend estimating TTC relative to vehicle speed and candidate line-of-sight distances adjusted downward by (1-P), where P represents our findings for the proportion of start distance by which >75% of deer had initiated flight. Where road design or conservation goals limit effectiveness of line-of-sight maintenance, we suggest incorporation of roadway obstacles that force drivers to slow vehicles, in addition to posting advisory speed limits. Public Library of Science 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4198184/ /pubmed/25333922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109988 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blackwell, Bradley F. Seamans, Thomas W. DeVault, Travis L. White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger |
title | White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger |
title_full | White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger |
title_fullStr | White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger |
title_full_unstemmed | White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger |
title_short | White-Tailed Deer Response to Vehicle Approach: Evidence of Unclear and Present Danger |
title_sort | white-tailed deer response to vehicle approach: evidence of unclear and present danger |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackwellbradleyf whitetaileddeerresponsetovehicleapproachevidenceofunclearandpresentdanger AT seamansthomasw whitetaileddeerresponsetovehicleapproachevidenceofunclearandpresentdanger AT devaulttravisl whitetaileddeerresponsetovehicleapproachevidenceofunclearandpresentdanger |