Cargando…

Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION: One way how to reduce morbidity and improve cosmesic of kidney surgery is single site laparoscopy. Relatively well described concept but without defined position in clincal practise. AIM: To report of institutional experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hora, Milan, Eret, Viktor, Stránský, Petr, Trávníček, Ivan, Ürge, Tomáš, Ferda, Jiří, Petersson, Fredrik, Hes, Ondřej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337160
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019
_version_ 1782339751821443072
author Hora, Milan
Eret, Viktor
Stránský, Petr
Trávníček, Ivan
Ürge, Tomáš
Ferda, Jiří
Petersson, Fredrik
Hes, Ondřej
author_facet Hora, Milan
Eret, Viktor
Stránský, Petr
Trávníček, Ivan
Ürge, Tomáš
Ferda, Jiří
Petersson, Fredrik
Hes, Ondřej
author_sort Hora, Milan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One way how to reduce morbidity and improve cosmesic of kidney surgery is single site laparoscopy. Relatively well described concept but without defined position in clincal practise. AIM: To report of institutional experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy (NE) and compare (matched case-control study) it with that of standard laparoscopic NE (LNE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period 8/2011 to 10/2013, we performed 183 mini-invasive NE (132 tumours, 51 benign aetiology); 45 of them (24.6%) were LESS, the rest LNE. The main but not absolute indications for LESS were: non-obese men, and less advanced tumours. In 13 patients undergoing LESS-NEs (28.9%) there was a transumbilical approach. For the rest, a pararectal incision was performed and an accessory port was added in 31.1% (14) – 2/22 (9.1%) left sided, 12/23 (52.2%) right sided. Twenty-four LESS-NE were performed by a more experienced surgeon (mean operation time (MOT) 73.1 min), 21 LESS-NE by 4 other surgeons (MOT 132.8 min). These 24 were compared with 43 LNE done by the same surgeon before the period of LESS (1/2007–8/2011) and with similar characteristics of cases (body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m(2), less advanced tumour). RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences in any of the parameters studied. The MOT 73.1 min vs. 75.0 min (p = 0.78), BMI 27.4 kg/m(2) vs. 29.2 kg/m(2) (p = 0.08), blood loss 54.7 vs. 39.2 (p = 0.47). Complications (4.2% vs. 11.6%) were only of internal character in origin. No conversion in either group. In LESS-NE, staplers were used more frequently (more expensive than clips) for division of renal hilar vessels (70.8% vs. 51.2%). The mean price of LESS-NE was €367 higher. CONCLUSIONS: The LESS NE performed by an experienced surgeon is a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign renal conditions in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2) and with low-stage tumours. The LESS NE is more expensive compared to LNE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4198631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41986312014-10-21 Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy Hora, Milan Eret, Viktor Stránský, Petr Trávníček, Ivan Ürge, Tomáš Ferda, Jiří Petersson, Fredrik Hes, Ondřej Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: One way how to reduce morbidity and improve cosmesic of kidney surgery is single site laparoscopy. Relatively well described concept but without defined position in clincal practise. AIM: To report of institutional experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy (NE) and compare (matched case-control study) it with that of standard laparoscopic NE (LNE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period 8/2011 to 10/2013, we performed 183 mini-invasive NE (132 tumours, 51 benign aetiology); 45 of them (24.6%) were LESS, the rest LNE. The main but not absolute indications for LESS were: non-obese men, and less advanced tumours. In 13 patients undergoing LESS-NEs (28.9%) there was a transumbilical approach. For the rest, a pararectal incision was performed and an accessory port was added in 31.1% (14) – 2/22 (9.1%) left sided, 12/23 (52.2%) right sided. Twenty-four LESS-NE were performed by a more experienced surgeon (mean operation time (MOT) 73.1 min), 21 LESS-NE by 4 other surgeons (MOT 132.8 min). These 24 were compared with 43 LNE done by the same surgeon before the period of LESS (1/2007–8/2011) and with similar characteristics of cases (body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m(2), less advanced tumour). RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences in any of the parameters studied. The MOT 73.1 min vs. 75.0 min (p = 0.78), BMI 27.4 kg/m(2) vs. 29.2 kg/m(2) (p = 0.08), blood loss 54.7 vs. 39.2 (p = 0.47). Complications (4.2% vs. 11.6%) were only of internal character in origin. No conversion in either group. In LESS-NE, staplers were used more frequently (more expensive than clips) for division of renal hilar vessels (70.8% vs. 51.2%). The mean price of LESS-NE was €367 higher. CONCLUSIONS: The LESS NE performed by an experienced surgeon is a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign renal conditions in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2) and with low-stage tumours. The LESS NE is more expensive compared to LNE. Termedia Publishing House 2014-05-26 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4198631/ /pubmed/25337160 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hora, Milan
Eret, Viktor
Stránský, Petr
Trávníček, Ivan
Ürge, Tomáš
Ferda, Jiří
Petersson, Fredrik
Hes, Ondřej
Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
title Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_full Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_fullStr Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_short Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_sort position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337160
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019
work_keys_str_mv AT horamilan positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT eretviktor positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT stranskypetr positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT travnicekivan positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT urgetomas positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT ferdajiri positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT peterssonfredrik positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT hesondrej positionoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerynephrectomyinclinicalpracticeandcomparisonmatchedcasecontrolstudywithstandardlaparoscopicnephrectomy