Cargando…
A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey
INTRODUCTION: Cost analysis studies performed in western countries report that the overall cost of lobectomies performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery is similar to or less than those performed via thoracotomy. The situation may be different in a developing country. AIM: We evaluated the cost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337166 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.44254 |
_version_ | 1782339756846219264 |
---|---|
author | Alpay, Levent Lacin, Tunc Teker, Dilek Okur, Erdal Baysungur, Volkan Kanbur, Serda Misirlioglu, Aysun Kosif Sonmez, Hakan Yalcinkaya, Irfan Kiyak, Mithat |
author_facet | Alpay, Levent Lacin, Tunc Teker, Dilek Okur, Erdal Baysungur, Volkan Kanbur, Serda Misirlioglu, Aysun Kosif Sonmez, Hakan Yalcinkaya, Irfan Kiyak, Mithat |
author_sort | Alpay, Levent |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cost analysis studies performed in western countries report that the overall cost of lobectomies performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery is similar to or less than those performed via thoracotomy. The situation may be different in a developing country. AIM: We evaluated the cost differences of these two surgical methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 81 patients who underwent lobectomy either via video-assisted thoracic surgery (n = 32) or via thoracotomy (n = 49). Patient characteristics, pathology, perioperative complications, additional surgical procedures, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and outcomes of both groups were recorded. Detailed cost data for medications, anesthesia, laboratory, surgical instruments, disposable instruments and surgery cost itself were also documented. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: The two groups were homogeneous in regard to age, sex, pathology and perioperative morbidity. The mean duration of hospitalization in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group was significantly shorter than that of the thoracotomy group (7.78 ±5.11 days vs. 10.65 ±6.57 days, p < 0.05). Overall final mean cost in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group was significantly higher than that of the thoracotomy group ($3970 ±1873 vs. $3083 ±1013, p = 0.002). This significant difference relies mostly on the cost of disposable surgical instruments, which were used much more in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group than the thoracotomy group ($2252 ±1856 vs. $427 ±47, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to western countries, a video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy may cost more than a lobectomy via thoracotomy in a developing country. More expensive disposable surgical instruments and cheaper hospital stay charges lead to higher overall costs in video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4198652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41986522014-10-21 A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey Alpay, Levent Lacin, Tunc Teker, Dilek Okur, Erdal Baysungur, Volkan Kanbur, Serda Misirlioglu, Aysun Kosif Sonmez, Hakan Yalcinkaya, Irfan Kiyak, Mithat Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Cost analysis studies performed in western countries report that the overall cost of lobectomies performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery is similar to or less than those performed via thoracotomy. The situation may be different in a developing country. AIM: We evaluated the cost differences of these two surgical methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 81 patients who underwent lobectomy either via video-assisted thoracic surgery (n = 32) or via thoracotomy (n = 49). Patient characteristics, pathology, perioperative complications, additional surgical procedures, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and outcomes of both groups were recorded. Detailed cost data for medications, anesthesia, laboratory, surgical instruments, disposable instruments and surgery cost itself were also documented. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: The two groups were homogeneous in regard to age, sex, pathology and perioperative morbidity. The mean duration of hospitalization in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group was significantly shorter than that of the thoracotomy group (7.78 ±5.11 days vs. 10.65 ±6.57 days, p < 0.05). Overall final mean cost in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group was significantly higher than that of the thoracotomy group ($3970 ±1873 vs. $3083 ±1013, p = 0.002). This significant difference relies mostly on the cost of disposable surgical instruments, which were used much more in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group than the thoracotomy group ($2252 ±1856 vs. $427 ±47, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to western countries, a video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy may cost more than a lobectomy via thoracotomy in a developing country. More expensive disposable surgical instruments and cheaper hospital stay charges lead to higher overall costs in video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy patients. Termedia Publishing House 2014-07-28 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4198652/ /pubmed/25337166 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.44254 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Alpay, Levent Lacin, Tunc Teker, Dilek Okur, Erdal Baysungur, Volkan Kanbur, Serda Misirlioglu, Aysun Kosif Sonmez, Hakan Yalcinkaya, Irfan Kiyak, Mithat A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey |
title | A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey |
title_full | A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey |
title_fullStr | A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey |
title_short | A comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in Turkey |
title_sort | comparative cost analysis study of lobectomy performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in turkey |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337166 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.44254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alpaylevent acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT lacintunc acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT tekerdilek acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT okurerdal acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT baysungurvolkan acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT kanburserda acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT misirliogluaysunkosif acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT sonmezhakan acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT yalcinkayairfan acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT kiyakmithat acomparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT alpaylevent comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT lacintunc comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT tekerdilek comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT okurerdal comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT baysungurvolkan comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT kanburserda comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT misirliogluaysunkosif comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT sonmezhakan comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT yalcinkayairfan comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey AT kiyakmithat comparativecostanalysisstudyoflobectomyperformedviavideoassistedthoracicsurgeryversusthoracotomyinturkey |