Cargando…

Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region

BACKGROUND: The burden of obesity and obesity-related conditions is not borne equally and disparities in prevalence are well documented for low-income, minority and rural adults in the United States. The current literature on rural versus urban disparities is largely derived from national surveillan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Jennie L, You, Wen, Zoellner, Jamie M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25297840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1051
_version_ 1782339761103437824
author Hill, Jennie L
You, Wen
Zoellner, Jamie M
author_facet Hill, Jennie L
You, Wen
Zoellner, Jamie M
author_sort Hill, Jennie L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The burden of obesity and obesity-related conditions is not borne equally and disparities in prevalence are well documented for low-income, minority and rural adults in the United States. The current literature on rural versus urban disparities is largely derived from national surveillance data which may not reflect regional nuances. There is little practical research that supports the reality of local service providers such as county health departments that may serve both urban and rural residents in a given area. Conducted through a community-academic partnership, the primary aim of this study is to quantify the current levels of obesity (BMI), fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and physical activity (PA) in a predominately rural health disparate region. Secondary aims are to determine if a gradient exists within the region in which rural residents have poorer outcomes on these indicators compared to urban residents. METHODS: Conducted as part of a larger ongoing community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative, data were gathered through a random digit dial telephone survey using previously validated measures (n = 784). Linear, logistic and quantile regression models are used to determine if residency (i.e. rural, urban) predicts outcomes of FV intake, PA and BMI. RESULTS: The majority (72%) of respondents were overweight (BMI = 29 ± 6 kg/m(2)), with 29% being obese. Only 9% of residents met recommendations for FV intake and 38% met recommendations for PA. Statistically significant gradients between urban and rural and race exist at the upper end of the BMI distribution. In other words, the severity of obesity is worse among black compared to white and for urban residents compared to rural residents. CONCLUSIONS: These results will be used by the community-academic partnership to guide the development of culturally relevant and sustainable interventions to increase PA, increase FV intake and reduce obesity within this health disparate region. In particular, local stakeholders may wish to address disparities in BMI by allocating resources to the vulnerable groups identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4198673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41986732014-10-17 Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region Hill, Jennie L You, Wen Zoellner, Jamie M BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The burden of obesity and obesity-related conditions is not borne equally and disparities in prevalence are well documented for low-income, minority and rural adults in the United States. The current literature on rural versus urban disparities is largely derived from national surveillance data which may not reflect regional nuances. There is little practical research that supports the reality of local service providers such as county health departments that may serve both urban and rural residents in a given area. Conducted through a community-academic partnership, the primary aim of this study is to quantify the current levels of obesity (BMI), fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and physical activity (PA) in a predominately rural health disparate region. Secondary aims are to determine if a gradient exists within the region in which rural residents have poorer outcomes on these indicators compared to urban residents. METHODS: Conducted as part of a larger ongoing community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative, data were gathered through a random digit dial telephone survey using previously validated measures (n = 784). Linear, logistic and quantile regression models are used to determine if residency (i.e. rural, urban) predicts outcomes of FV intake, PA and BMI. RESULTS: The majority (72%) of respondents were overweight (BMI = 29 ± 6 kg/m(2)), with 29% being obese. Only 9% of residents met recommendations for FV intake and 38% met recommendations for PA. Statistically significant gradients between urban and rural and race exist at the upper end of the BMI distribution. In other words, the severity of obesity is worse among black compared to white and for urban residents compared to rural residents. CONCLUSIONS: These results will be used by the community-academic partnership to guide the development of culturally relevant and sustainable interventions to increase PA, increase FV intake and reduce obesity within this health disparate region. In particular, local stakeholders may wish to address disparities in BMI by allocating resources to the vulnerable groups identified. BioMed Central 2014-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4198673/ /pubmed/25297840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1051 Text en © Hill et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hill, Jennie L
You, Wen
Zoellner, Jamie M
Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
title Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
title_full Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
title_fullStr Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
title_short Disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
title_sort disparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate region
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25297840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1051
work_keys_str_mv AT hilljenniel disparitiesinobesityamongruralandurbanresidentsinahealthdisparateregion
AT youwen disparitiesinobesityamongruralandurbanresidentsinahealthdisparateregion
AT zoellnerjamiem disparitiesinobesityamongruralandurbanresidentsinahealthdisparateregion