Cargando…

Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools

BACKGROUND: Scoliogauge, has been developed for the measurement of ATR on iPhone smartphones. This study was to evaluate the reliability for the smartphone-aided ATR measurement method and to compare its reliability with that of the manual method. METHODS: Sixty-four AIS patients with single thoraci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiao, Jun, Xu, Leilei, Zhu, Zezhang, Zhu, Feng, Liu, Zhen, Qian, Bangping, Qiu, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25305758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-343
_version_ 1782339761866801152
author Qiao, Jun
Xu, Leilei
Zhu, Zezhang
Zhu, Feng
Liu, Zhen
Qian, Bangping
Qiu, Yong
author_facet Qiao, Jun
Xu, Leilei
Zhu, Zezhang
Zhu, Feng
Liu, Zhen
Qian, Bangping
Qiu, Yong
author_sort Qiao, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scoliogauge, has been developed for the measurement of ATR on iPhone smartphones. This study was to evaluate the reliability for the smartphone-aided ATR measurement method and to compare its reliability with that of the manual method. METHODS: Sixty-four AIS patients with single thoracic or lumbar curve participated in this study. Of these patients, thirty-two patients had main thoracic scoliosis while other thirty-two had main thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis. Two spine surgeons performed the measurements with Scoliometer and Scoliogauge. The Scoliogauge measurements were conducted on an iPhone 4 smartphone. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 2-way mixed model on absolute agreement was used to analyze the reliability categorized according to regions: thoracic or lumbar, and Cobb angles: <20 degrees and >40 degrees. ICC < 0.40 is considered as poor, 0.40–0.59 as fair, 0.60–0.74 as good, and 0.75–1.00 as excellent. RESULTS: The overall intraobserver variability was 0.954 and the overall interobserver variability was 0.943 for the scoliometer set, whereas the intraobserver variability was 0.965 and interobserver variability was 0.964 for the scoliogauge set. Both the intraobserver and interobserver ICCs reached the excellent value in the 2 sets for both observers. The mean Cobb angle of thoracic curves in patients with main thoracic scoliosis was similar to that of lumbar curves in those with main thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis (35.7 degrees vs. 36.1 degrees). The intraobserver and interobserver reliability was similar between two groups (thoracic vs. lumbar) in the 2 sets. There were 21 patients having Cobb angles < 20 degrees, while 20 patients >40 degrees. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability was better in severe curve(>40 degrees) group. CONCLUSION: Smartphone-aided measurement for ATR showed excellent reliability, and the reliability of measurement with either scoliometer or scoliogauge could be influenced by Cobb angle that reliability was better for curves with larger Cobb angles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-343) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4198676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41986762014-10-17 Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools Qiao, Jun Xu, Leilei Zhu, Zezhang Zhu, Feng Liu, Zhen Qian, Bangping Qiu, Yong BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Scoliogauge, has been developed for the measurement of ATR on iPhone smartphones. This study was to evaluate the reliability for the smartphone-aided ATR measurement method and to compare its reliability with that of the manual method. METHODS: Sixty-four AIS patients with single thoracic or lumbar curve participated in this study. Of these patients, thirty-two patients had main thoracic scoliosis while other thirty-two had main thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis. Two spine surgeons performed the measurements with Scoliometer and Scoliogauge. The Scoliogauge measurements were conducted on an iPhone 4 smartphone. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 2-way mixed model on absolute agreement was used to analyze the reliability categorized according to regions: thoracic or lumbar, and Cobb angles: <20 degrees and >40 degrees. ICC < 0.40 is considered as poor, 0.40–0.59 as fair, 0.60–0.74 as good, and 0.75–1.00 as excellent. RESULTS: The overall intraobserver variability was 0.954 and the overall interobserver variability was 0.943 for the scoliometer set, whereas the intraobserver variability was 0.965 and interobserver variability was 0.964 for the scoliogauge set. Both the intraobserver and interobserver ICCs reached the excellent value in the 2 sets for both observers. The mean Cobb angle of thoracic curves in patients with main thoracic scoliosis was similar to that of lumbar curves in those with main thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis (35.7 degrees vs. 36.1 degrees). The intraobserver and interobserver reliability was similar between two groups (thoracic vs. lumbar) in the 2 sets. There were 21 patients having Cobb angles < 20 degrees, while 20 patients >40 degrees. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability was better in severe curve(>40 degrees) group. CONCLUSION: Smartphone-aided measurement for ATR showed excellent reliability, and the reliability of measurement with either scoliometer or scoliogauge could be influenced by Cobb angle that reliability was better for curves with larger Cobb angles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-343) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4198676/ /pubmed/25305758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-343 Text en © Qiao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qiao, Jun
Xu, Leilei
Zhu, Zezhang
Zhu, Feng
Liu, Zhen
Qian, Bangping
Qiu, Yong
Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
title Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
title_full Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
title_fullStr Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
title_short Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
title_sort inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25305758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-343
work_keys_str_mv AT qiaojun interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools
AT xuleilei interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools
AT zhuzezhang interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools
AT zhufeng interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools
AT liuzhen interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools
AT qianbangping interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools
AT qiuyong interandintraobserverreliabilityassessmentoftheaxialtrunkrotationmanualversussmartphoneaidedmeasurementtools