Cargando…

Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden

BACKGROUND: In chemotherapy trials quality of life (QOL) is assessed mostly at the days of chemotherapy administration (i.e. event-driven) during treatment and follows fixed time intervals in the aftercare phase (i.e. time-driven). Specific QOL impairments and treatment side-effects are known to be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giesinger, Johannes M, Wintner, Lisa M, Zabernigg, August, Gamper, Eva-Maria, Oberguggenberger, Anne S, Sztankay, Monika J, Kemmler, Georg, Holzner, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25305067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-758
_version_ 1782339768911134720
author Giesinger, Johannes M
Wintner, Lisa M
Zabernigg, August
Gamper, Eva-Maria
Oberguggenberger, Anne S
Sztankay, Monika J
Kemmler, Georg
Holzner, Bernhard
author_facet Giesinger, Johannes M
Wintner, Lisa M
Zabernigg, August
Gamper, Eva-Maria
Oberguggenberger, Anne S
Sztankay, Monika J
Kemmler, Georg
Holzner, Bernhard
author_sort Giesinger, Johannes M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In chemotherapy trials quality of life (QOL) is assessed mostly at the days of chemotherapy administration (i.e. event-driven) during treatment and follows fixed time intervals in the aftercare phase (i.e. time-driven). Specific QOL impairments and treatment side-effects are known to be time dependent following different trajectories. Therefore, acute problems are likely to be missed if assessments are done infrequently or at inappropriate time points. Since the planning of supportive care interventions during chemotherapy depends on knowledge about symptom trajectories, such information may be of substantial importance to a clinician. METHODS: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at Kufstein County Hospital were assessed using an electronic version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at the day of chemotherapy administration at the hospital. One and two weeks later assessments were repeated via the internet while patients were at home. Assessments at home and the hospital were conducted using the web-based software CHES. Data were analysed by means of linear mixed models. RESULTS: A sample of 54 chemotherapy outpatients participated in electronic QOL assessments at the hospital and at home. For 9 out of the 15 QOL domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 patients reported increased burden one week after chemotherapy administration compared to the day of chemotherapy administration. Most pronounced differences were found for Fatigue, Constipation, and Appetite Loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients experience most severe QOL impairments in the week following chemotherapy administration. This is a period that is usually not covered by QOL assessments in chemotherapy trials which may result in underestimation of true treatment burden. Our findings suggest to conduct QOL assessments not only event- or time-driven, but to rely on specific hypotheses on symptom and functioning trajectories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4198707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41987072014-10-17 Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden Giesinger, Johannes M Wintner, Lisa M Zabernigg, August Gamper, Eva-Maria Oberguggenberger, Anne S Sztankay, Monika J Kemmler, Georg Holzner, Bernhard BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In chemotherapy trials quality of life (QOL) is assessed mostly at the days of chemotherapy administration (i.e. event-driven) during treatment and follows fixed time intervals in the aftercare phase (i.e. time-driven). Specific QOL impairments and treatment side-effects are known to be time dependent following different trajectories. Therefore, acute problems are likely to be missed if assessments are done infrequently or at inappropriate time points. Since the planning of supportive care interventions during chemotherapy depends on knowledge about symptom trajectories, such information may be of substantial importance to a clinician. METHODS: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at Kufstein County Hospital were assessed using an electronic version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at the day of chemotherapy administration at the hospital. One and two weeks later assessments were repeated via the internet while patients were at home. Assessments at home and the hospital were conducted using the web-based software CHES. Data were analysed by means of linear mixed models. RESULTS: A sample of 54 chemotherapy outpatients participated in electronic QOL assessments at the hospital and at home. For 9 out of the 15 QOL domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 patients reported increased burden one week after chemotherapy administration compared to the day of chemotherapy administration. Most pronounced differences were found for Fatigue, Constipation, and Appetite Loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients experience most severe QOL impairments in the week following chemotherapy administration. This is a period that is usually not covered by QOL assessments in chemotherapy trials which may result in underestimation of true treatment burden. Our findings suggest to conduct QOL assessments not only event- or time-driven, but to rely on specific hypotheses on symptom and functioning trajectories. BioMed Central 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4198707/ /pubmed/25305067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-758 Text en © Giesinger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Giesinger, Johannes M
Wintner, Lisa M
Zabernigg, August
Gamper, Eva-Maria
Oberguggenberger, Anne S
Sztankay, Monika J
Kemmler, Georg
Holzner, Bernhard
Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
title Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
title_full Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
title_fullStr Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
title_full_unstemmed Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
title_short Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
title_sort assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients’ true symptom burden
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25305067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-758
work_keys_str_mv AT giesingerjohannesm assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT wintnerlisam assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT zaberniggaugust assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT gamperevamaria assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT oberguggenbergerannes assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT sztankaymonikaj assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT kemmlergeorg assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden
AT holznerbernhard assessingqualityoflifeonthedayofchemotherapyadministrationunderestimatespatientstruesymptomburden