Cargando…

Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers

BACKGROUND: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzalo, Jed D, Heist, Brian S, Duffy, Briar L, Dyrbye, Liselotte, Fagan, Mark J, Ferenchick, Gary, Harrell, Heather, Hemmer, Paul A, Kernan, Walter N, Kogan, Jennifer R, Rafferty, Colleen, Wong, Raymond, Elnicki, Michael D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-212
_version_ 1782339775061032960
author Gonzalo, Jed D
Heist, Brian S
Duffy, Briar L
Dyrbye, Liselotte
Fagan, Mark J
Ferenchick, Gary
Harrell, Heather
Hemmer, Paul A
Kernan, Walter N
Kogan, Jennifer R
Rafferty, Colleen
Wong, Raymond
Elnicki, Michael D
author_facet Gonzalo, Jed D
Heist, Brian S
Duffy, Briar L
Dyrbye, Liselotte
Fagan, Mark J
Ferenchick, Gary
Harrell, Heather
Hemmer, Paul A
Kernan, Walter N
Kogan, Jennifer R
Rafferty, Colleen
Wong, Raymond
Elnicki, Michael D
author_sort Gonzalo, Jed D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds. METHODS: The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010–2011). RESULTS: Half of the respondents (50%) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace “teachable moments” related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4198734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41987342014-10-17 Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers Gonzalo, Jed D Heist, Brian S Duffy, Briar L Dyrbye, Liselotte Fagan, Mark J Ferenchick, Gary Harrell, Heather Hemmer, Paul A Kernan, Walter N Kogan, Jennifer R Rafferty, Colleen Wong, Raymond Elnicki, Michael D BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds. METHODS: The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010–2011). RESULTS: Half of the respondents (50%) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace “teachable moments” related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching. BioMed Central 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4198734/ /pubmed/25304386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-212 Text en © Gonzalo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gonzalo, Jed D
Heist, Brian S
Duffy, Briar L
Dyrbye, Liselotte
Fagan, Mark J
Ferenchick, Gary
Harrell, Heather
Hemmer, Paul A
Kernan, Walter N
Kogan, Jennifer R
Rafferty, Colleen
Wong, Raymond
Elnicki, Michael D
Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
title Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
title_full Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
title_fullStr Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
title_full_unstemmed Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
title_short Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
title_sort content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-212
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalojedd contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT heistbrians contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT duffybriarl contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT dyrbyeliselotte contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT faganmarkj contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT ferenchickgary contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT harrellheather contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT hemmerpaula contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT kernanwaltern contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT koganjenniferr contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT raffertycolleen contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT wongraymond contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers
AT elnickimichaeld contentandtimingoffeedbackandreflectionamulticenterqualitativestudyofexperiencedbedsideteachers