Cargando…

Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study

BACKGROUND: Nasal potential difference (NPD) and intestinal current measurement (ICM) are functional CFTR tests that are used as adjunctive diagnostic tools for cystic fibrosis (CF). Smoking has a systemic negative impact on CFTR function. A diagnostic comparison between NPD and ICM and the impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagheri-Hanson, Azadeh, Nedwed, Sebastian, Rueckes-Nilges, Claudia, Naehrlich, Lutz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-156
_version_ 1782339850311041024
author Bagheri-Hanson, Azadeh
Nedwed, Sebastian
Rueckes-Nilges, Claudia
Naehrlich, Lutz
author_facet Bagheri-Hanson, Azadeh
Nedwed, Sebastian
Rueckes-Nilges, Claudia
Naehrlich, Lutz
author_sort Bagheri-Hanson, Azadeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nasal potential difference (NPD) and intestinal current measurement (ICM) are functional CFTR tests that are used as adjunctive diagnostic tools for cystic fibrosis (CF). Smoking has a systemic negative impact on CFTR function. A diagnostic comparison between NPD and ICM and the impact of smoking on both CFTR tests has not been done. METHODS: The sweat chloride test, NPD, and ICM were performed in 18 patients with CF (sweat chloride >60 mmol/l), including 6 pancreatic sufficient (PS) patients, and 13 healthy controls, including 8 smokers. The NPD CFTR response to Cl-free and isoproterenol perfusion (Δ0Cl(-) + Iso) was compared to the ICM CFTR response to forskolin/IBMX, carbachol, and histamine (ΔI(sc, forskolin/IBMX+ carbachol+histamine)). RESULTS: The mean NPD CFTR response and ICM CFTR response between patients with CF and healthy controls was significantly different (p <0.001), but not between patients with CF who were PS and those who were pancreatic insufficient (PI). Smokers have a decreased CFTR response measured by NPD (p = 0.049). For ICM there is a trend towards decreased CFTR response (NS). Three healthy control smokers had NPD responses within the CF-range. In contrast to NPD, there was no overlap of the ICM response between patients with CF and controls. CONCLUSIONS: ICM is superior to NPD in distinguishing between patients with CF who have a sweat chloride > 60 mmol/l and healthy controls, including smokers. Neither NPD nor ICM differentiated between patients with CF who were PS from those who were PI. Smoking has a negative impact on CFTR function in healthy controls measured by NPD and challenges the diagnostic interpretation of NPD, but not ICM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-156) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4199064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41990642014-10-17 Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study Bagheri-Hanson, Azadeh Nedwed, Sebastian Rueckes-Nilges, Claudia Naehrlich, Lutz BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Nasal potential difference (NPD) and intestinal current measurement (ICM) are functional CFTR tests that are used as adjunctive diagnostic tools for cystic fibrosis (CF). Smoking has a systemic negative impact on CFTR function. A diagnostic comparison between NPD and ICM and the impact of smoking on both CFTR tests has not been done. METHODS: The sweat chloride test, NPD, and ICM were performed in 18 patients with CF (sweat chloride >60 mmol/l), including 6 pancreatic sufficient (PS) patients, and 13 healthy controls, including 8 smokers. The NPD CFTR response to Cl-free and isoproterenol perfusion (Δ0Cl(-) + Iso) was compared to the ICM CFTR response to forskolin/IBMX, carbachol, and histamine (ΔI(sc, forskolin/IBMX+ carbachol+histamine)). RESULTS: The mean NPD CFTR response and ICM CFTR response between patients with CF and healthy controls was significantly different (p <0.001), but not between patients with CF who were PS and those who were pancreatic insufficient (PI). Smokers have a decreased CFTR response measured by NPD (p = 0.049). For ICM there is a trend towards decreased CFTR response (NS). Three healthy control smokers had NPD responses within the CF-range. In contrast to NPD, there was no overlap of the ICM response between patients with CF and controls. CONCLUSIONS: ICM is superior to NPD in distinguishing between patients with CF who have a sweat chloride > 60 mmol/l and healthy controls, including smokers. Neither NPD nor ICM differentiated between patients with CF who were PS from those who were PI. Smoking has a negative impact on CFTR function in healthy controls measured by NPD and challenges the diagnostic interpretation of NPD, but not ICM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-156) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4199064/ /pubmed/25280757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-156 Text en © Bagheri-Hanson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bagheri-Hanson, Azadeh
Nedwed, Sebastian
Rueckes-Nilges, Claudia
Naehrlich, Lutz
Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
title Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
title_full Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
title_fullStr Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
title_short Intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
title_sort intestinal current measurement versus nasal potential difference measurements for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a case–control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-156
work_keys_str_mv AT bagherihansonazadeh intestinalcurrentmeasurementversusnasalpotentialdifferencemeasurementsfordiagnosisofcysticfibrosisacasecontrolstudy
AT nedwedsebastian intestinalcurrentmeasurementversusnasalpotentialdifferencemeasurementsfordiagnosisofcysticfibrosisacasecontrolstudy
AT rueckesnilgesclaudia intestinalcurrentmeasurementversusnasalpotentialdifferencemeasurementsfordiagnosisofcysticfibrosisacasecontrolstudy
AT naehrlichlutz intestinalcurrentmeasurementversusnasalpotentialdifferencemeasurementsfordiagnosisofcysticfibrosisacasecontrolstudy