Cargando…

Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most common regional anesthesia (RA) conducted for many surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to predict the difficulty score of SA, by which to reduce the complications and ultimately improve the anesthesia quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoshrang, Hossein, Falahatkar, Siavash, Heidarzadeh, Abtin, Abad, Mohsen, Rastjou Herfeh, Nadia, Naderi Nabi, Bahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337470
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.16244
_version_ 1782339874067578880
author Khoshrang, Hossein
Falahatkar, Siavash
Heidarzadeh, Abtin
Abad, Mohsen
Rastjou Herfeh, Nadia
Naderi Nabi, Bahram
author_facet Khoshrang, Hossein
Falahatkar, Siavash
Heidarzadeh, Abtin
Abad, Mohsen
Rastjou Herfeh, Nadia
Naderi Nabi, Bahram
author_sort Khoshrang, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most common regional anesthesia (RA) conducted for many surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to predict the difficulty score of SA, by which to reduce the complications and ultimately improve the anesthesia quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transurethral Lithotripsy (TUL) surgery candidates were enrolled in this observational study from 2010 to 2011. Before SA, the patient`s demographic information along with the Body Mass Index (BMI), lumbar spinous process status, spinal deformity, radiological signs of lumbar vertebrae, and a history of spinal surgery or difficult SA were recorded, then the patients underwent SA in L3-L4 interspinous process space. Information about Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) visibility at the first attempt (easy SA) and the times of trying with shifting in that space or trying the second space (moderate SA) and the third space (difficult SA) were recorded. Multinominal regression and relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Hundred and one patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 50 (49.5%) underwent SA by the first attempt of the first space, in 36 patients (35.6%) it was moderate and in 15 patients (14.9%) it was difficult. There was no significant relationship between difficulty score of SA and gender, age, height, and history of previous difficult SA. But there was a significant relationship between difficulty score of SA and lumbar spinous process status (P =0.0001), radiological profile of the lumbar spine (P = 0.0001), the status of lumbar deformity (P = 0.007), and BMI (P = 0.006). Then using the ROC curve to predict the difficult SA, the cutoff point was 8.5 with 86.7% and 86% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that considering the clinical examination of patients before SA focusing on lumbar spinous process status, presence of lumbar deformity, calculation of BMI and radiological signs of lumbar vertebrae can be helpful in predicting SA difficulty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4199214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41992142014-10-21 Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery Khoshrang, Hossein Falahatkar, Siavash Heidarzadeh, Abtin Abad, Mohsen Rastjou Herfeh, Nadia Naderi Nabi, Bahram Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most common regional anesthesia (RA) conducted for many surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to predict the difficulty score of SA, by which to reduce the complications and ultimately improve the anesthesia quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transurethral Lithotripsy (TUL) surgery candidates were enrolled in this observational study from 2010 to 2011. Before SA, the patient`s demographic information along with the Body Mass Index (BMI), lumbar spinous process status, spinal deformity, radiological signs of lumbar vertebrae, and a history of spinal surgery or difficult SA were recorded, then the patients underwent SA in L3-L4 interspinous process space. Information about Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) visibility at the first attempt (easy SA) and the times of trying with shifting in that space or trying the second space (moderate SA) and the third space (difficult SA) were recorded. Multinominal regression and relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Hundred and one patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 50 (49.5%) underwent SA by the first attempt of the first space, in 36 patients (35.6%) it was moderate and in 15 patients (14.9%) it was difficult. There was no significant relationship between difficulty score of SA and gender, age, height, and history of previous difficult SA. But there was a significant relationship between difficulty score of SA and lumbar spinous process status (P =0.0001), radiological profile of the lumbar spine (P = 0.0001), the status of lumbar deformity (P = 0.007), and BMI (P = 0.006). Then using the ROC curve to predict the difficult SA, the cutoff point was 8.5 with 86.7% and 86% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that considering the clinical examination of patients before SA focusing on lumbar spinous process status, presence of lumbar deformity, calculation of BMI and radiological signs of lumbar vertebrae can be helpful in predicting SA difficulty. Kowsar 2014-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4199214/ /pubmed/25337470 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.16244 Text en Copyright © 2014, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM); Published by Kowsar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khoshrang, Hossein
Falahatkar, Siavash
Heidarzadeh, Abtin
Abad, Mohsen
Rastjou Herfeh, Nadia
Naderi Nabi, Bahram
Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery
title Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery
title_full Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery
title_fullStr Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery
title_short Predicting Difficulty Score for Spinal Anesthesia in Transurethral Lithotripsy Surgery
title_sort predicting difficulty score for spinal anesthesia in transurethral lithotripsy surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337470
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.16244
work_keys_str_mv AT khoshranghossein predictingdifficultyscoreforspinalanesthesiaintransurethrallithotripsysurgery
AT falahatkarsiavash predictingdifficultyscoreforspinalanesthesiaintransurethrallithotripsysurgery
AT heidarzadehabtin predictingdifficultyscoreforspinalanesthesiaintransurethrallithotripsysurgery
AT abadmohsen predictingdifficultyscoreforspinalanesthesiaintransurethrallithotripsysurgery
AT rastjouherfehnadia predictingdifficultyscoreforspinalanesthesiaintransurethrallithotripsysurgery
AT naderinabibahram predictingdifficultyscoreforspinalanesthesiaintransurethrallithotripsysurgery