Cargando…

The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed

Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve increases corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions, indicating that proprioceptive sensory input arriving at the cortex plays a fundamental role in modulating corticospinal excitability. The purpose of this study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Kei, Sugawara, Kenichi, Miyaguchi, Shota, Matsumoto, Takuya, Kirimoto, Hikari, Tamaki, Hiroyuki, Onishi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00835
_version_ 1782339879435239424
author Saito, Kei
Sugawara, Kenichi
Miyaguchi, Shota
Matsumoto, Takuya
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Onishi, Hideaki
author_facet Saito, Kei
Sugawara, Kenichi
Miyaguchi, Shota
Matsumoto, Takuya
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Onishi, Hideaki
author_sort Saito, Kei
collection PubMed
description Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve increases corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions, indicating that proprioceptive sensory input arriving at the cortex plays a fundamental role in modulating corticospinal excitability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effect of electrical stimulation on the corticospinal excitability varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during a shortening contraction, an isometric contraction, or no contraction of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. In some trials, electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve was performed at 110% of the sensory threshold or 110% of the motor threshold prior to TMS. Electrical stimulation involved either a train of 50 pulses at 10 Hz or a single pulse. Shortening contraction with the train of electrical stimuli significantly increased MEP amplitudes, and the increase was dependent on the type of stimulation. Isometric contraction with the train of electrical stimuli and electrical stimulation without voluntary contraction did not affect MEP amplitudes. A single pulse of electrical stimulation did not affect MEP amplitudes in any condition. Thus, electrical-stimulation-induced modulation of corticospinal excitability varied according to the type of muscle contraction performed and the type of stimulation. These results show that the type of contraction should be considered when using electrical stimulation for rehabilitation in patients with central nervous system lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4199265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41992652014-10-30 The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed Saito, Kei Sugawara, Kenichi Miyaguchi, Shota Matsumoto, Takuya Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve increases corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions, indicating that proprioceptive sensory input arriving at the cortex plays a fundamental role in modulating corticospinal excitability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effect of electrical stimulation on the corticospinal excitability varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during a shortening contraction, an isometric contraction, or no contraction of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. In some trials, electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve was performed at 110% of the sensory threshold or 110% of the motor threshold prior to TMS. Electrical stimulation involved either a train of 50 pulses at 10 Hz or a single pulse. Shortening contraction with the train of electrical stimuli significantly increased MEP amplitudes, and the increase was dependent on the type of stimulation. Isometric contraction with the train of electrical stimuli and electrical stimulation without voluntary contraction did not affect MEP amplitudes. A single pulse of electrical stimulation did not affect MEP amplitudes in any condition. Thus, electrical-stimulation-induced modulation of corticospinal excitability varied according to the type of muscle contraction performed and the type of stimulation. These results show that the type of contraction should be considered when using electrical stimulation for rehabilitation in patients with central nervous system lesions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4199265/ /pubmed/25360103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00835 Text en Copyright © 2014 Saito, Sugawara, Miyaguchi, Matsumoto, Kirimoto, Tamaki and Onishi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Saito, Kei
Sugawara, Kenichi
Miyaguchi, Shota
Matsumoto, Takuya
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Onishi, Hideaki
The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
title The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
title_full The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
title_fullStr The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
title_full_unstemmed The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
title_short The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
title_sort modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00835
work_keys_str_mv AT saitokei themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT sugawarakenichi themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT miyaguchishota themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT matsumototakuya themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT kirimotohikari themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT tamakihiroyuki themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT onishihideaki themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT saitokei modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT sugawarakenichi modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT miyaguchishota modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT matsumototakuya modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT kirimotohikari modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT tamakihiroyuki modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed
AT onishihideaki modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed