Cargando…
The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed
Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve increases corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions, indicating that proprioceptive sensory input arriving at the cortex plays a fundamental role in modulating corticospinal excitability. The purpose of this study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00835 |
_version_ | 1782339879435239424 |
---|---|
author | Saito, Kei Sugawara, Kenichi Miyaguchi, Shota Matsumoto, Takuya Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki |
author_facet | Saito, Kei Sugawara, Kenichi Miyaguchi, Shota Matsumoto, Takuya Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki |
author_sort | Saito, Kei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve increases corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions, indicating that proprioceptive sensory input arriving at the cortex plays a fundamental role in modulating corticospinal excitability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effect of electrical stimulation on the corticospinal excitability varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during a shortening contraction, an isometric contraction, or no contraction of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. In some trials, electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve was performed at 110% of the sensory threshold or 110% of the motor threshold prior to TMS. Electrical stimulation involved either a train of 50 pulses at 10 Hz or a single pulse. Shortening contraction with the train of electrical stimuli significantly increased MEP amplitudes, and the increase was dependent on the type of stimulation. Isometric contraction with the train of electrical stimuli and electrical stimulation without voluntary contraction did not affect MEP amplitudes. A single pulse of electrical stimulation did not affect MEP amplitudes in any condition. Thus, electrical-stimulation-induced modulation of corticospinal excitability varied according to the type of muscle contraction performed and the type of stimulation. These results show that the type of contraction should be considered when using electrical stimulation for rehabilitation in patients with central nervous system lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4199265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41992652014-10-30 The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed Saito, Kei Sugawara, Kenichi Miyaguchi, Shota Matsumoto, Takuya Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Afferent input caused by electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve increases corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions, indicating that proprioceptive sensory input arriving at the cortex plays a fundamental role in modulating corticospinal excitability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effect of electrical stimulation on the corticospinal excitability varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during a shortening contraction, an isometric contraction, or no contraction of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. In some trials, electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve was performed at 110% of the sensory threshold or 110% of the motor threshold prior to TMS. Electrical stimulation involved either a train of 50 pulses at 10 Hz or a single pulse. Shortening contraction with the train of electrical stimuli significantly increased MEP amplitudes, and the increase was dependent on the type of stimulation. Isometric contraction with the train of electrical stimuli and electrical stimulation without voluntary contraction did not affect MEP amplitudes. A single pulse of electrical stimulation did not affect MEP amplitudes in any condition. Thus, electrical-stimulation-induced modulation of corticospinal excitability varied according to the type of muscle contraction performed and the type of stimulation. These results show that the type of contraction should be considered when using electrical stimulation for rehabilitation in patients with central nervous system lesions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4199265/ /pubmed/25360103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00835 Text en Copyright © 2014 Saito, Sugawara, Miyaguchi, Matsumoto, Kirimoto, Tamaki and Onishi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Saito, Kei Sugawara, Kenichi Miyaguchi, Shota Matsumoto, Takuya Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Onishi, Hideaki The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
title | The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
title_full | The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
title_fullStr | The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
title_full_unstemmed | The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
title_short | The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
title_sort | modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25360103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saitokei themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT sugawarakenichi themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT miyaguchishota themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT matsumototakuya themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT kirimotohikari themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT tamakihiroyuki themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT onishihideaki themodulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT saitokei modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT sugawarakenichi modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT miyaguchishota modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT matsumototakuya modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT kirimotohikari modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT tamakihiroyuki modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed AT onishihideaki modulatoryeffectofelectricalstimulationontheexcitabilityofthecorticospinaltractvariesaccordingtothetypeofmusclecontractionbeingperformed |