Cargando…

Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study

INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 was first reported in poultry in Nigeria in February 2006. The only human case that occurred was linked to contact with poultry in a live bird market (LBM). LBM surveillance was instituted to assess the degree of threat of human exposure to H5N1....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie, Nguku, Patrick, Olayinka, Adebola, Ajayi, Ike, Kabir, Junaidu, Okolocha, Emmanuel, Tseggai, Tesfai, Joannis, Tony, Okewole, Phillip, Kumbish, Peterside, Ahmed, Mohammed, Lombin, Lami, Nsubuga, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328630
http://dx.doi.org/10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4188
_version_ 1782339892297072640
author Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie
Nguku, Patrick
Olayinka, Adebola
Ajayi, Ike
Kabir, Junaidu
Okolocha, Emmanuel
Tseggai, Tesfai
Joannis, Tony
Okewole, Phillip
Kumbish, Peterside
Ahmed, Mohammed
Lombin, Lami
Nsubuga, Peter
author_facet Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie
Nguku, Patrick
Olayinka, Adebola
Ajayi, Ike
Kabir, Junaidu
Okolocha, Emmanuel
Tseggai, Tesfai
Joannis, Tony
Okewole, Phillip
Kumbish, Peterside
Ahmed, Mohammed
Lombin, Lami
Nsubuga, Peter
author_sort Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 was first reported in poultry in Nigeria in February 2006. The only human case that occurred was linked to contact with poultry in a live bird market (LBM). LBM surveillance was instituted to assess the degree of threat of human exposure to H5N1. The key indicator was detection of H5N1 in LBMs. We evaluated the surveillance system to assess its operations and attributes. METHODS: We used the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. We reviewed and analyzed passive surveillance data for HPAI (January 2006-March 2009) from the Avian Influenza National Reference Laboratory, and live bird market surveillance data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nigeria. We interviewed key stakeholders and reviewed reports of live bird market surveillance to obtain additional information on the operations of the system. We assessed the key system attributes. RESULTS: A total of 299 cases occurred in 25 (72%) states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The system detected HPAI H5N1 virus in 7 (9.5%) LBMs; 2 (29%) of which were from 2 (18.2%) states with no previous case. A total of 17,852 (91.5%) of samples arrived at the laboratory within 24 hours but laboratory analysis took over 7 days. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 15.4% and 66.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: The system is useful, flexible, complex and not timely, but appears to be meeting its objectives. The isolation of HPAI H5N1 virus in some of these markets is an indication that the markets are possible reservoirs of the virus in Nigeria. We recommend that the Federal Government of Nigeria should dedicate more funds for surveillance for HPAI as this will aid early warning and reduce the risk of a pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4199346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The African Field Epidemiology Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41993462014-10-17 Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie Nguku, Patrick Olayinka, Adebola Ajayi, Ike Kabir, Junaidu Okolocha, Emmanuel Tseggai, Tesfai Joannis, Tony Okewole, Phillip Kumbish, Peterside Ahmed, Mohammed Lombin, Lami Nsubuga, Peter Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 was first reported in poultry in Nigeria in February 2006. The only human case that occurred was linked to contact with poultry in a live bird market (LBM). LBM surveillance was instituted to assess the degree of threat of human exposure to H5N1. The key indicator was detection of H5N1 in LBMs. We evaluated the surveillance system to assess its operations and attributes. METHODS: We used the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. We reviewed and analyzed passive surveillance data for HPAI (January 2006-March 2009) from the Avian Influenza National Reference Laboratory, and live bird market surveillance data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nigeria. We interviewed key stakeholders and reviewed reports of live bird market surveillance to obtain additional information on the operations of the system. We assessed the key system attributes. RESULTS: A total of 299 cases occurred in 25 (72%) states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The system detected HPAI H5N1 virus in 7 (9.5%) LBMs; 2 (29%) of which were from 2 (18.2%) states with no previous case. A total of 17,852 (91.5%) of samples arrived at the laboratory within 24 hours but laboratory analysis took over 7 days. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 15.4% and 66.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: The system is useful, flexible, complex and not timely, but appears to be meeting its objectives. The isolation of HPAI H5N1 virus in some of these markets is an indication that the markets are possible reservoirs of the virus in Nigeria. We recommend that the Federal Government of Nigeria should dedicate more funds for surveillance for HPAI as this will aid early warning and reduce the risk of a pandemic. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4199346/ /pubmed/25328630 http://dx.doi.org/10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4188 Text en © Ndadilnasiya Endie Waziri et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie
Nguku, Patrick
Olayinka, Adebola
Ajayi, Ike
Kabir, Junaidu
Okolocha, Emmanuel
Tseggai, Tesfai
Joannis, Tony
Okewole, Phillip
Kumbish, Peterside
Ahmed, Mohammed
Lombin, Lami
Nsubuga, Peter
Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
title Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
title_full Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
title_fullStr Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
title_short Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
title_sort evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328630
http://dx.doi.org/10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4188
work_keys_str_mv AT wazirindadilnasiyaendie evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT ngukupatrick evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT olayinkaadebola evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT ajayiike evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT kabirjunaidu evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT okolochaemmanuel evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT tseggaitesfai evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT joannistony evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT okewolephillip evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT kumbishpeterside evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT ahmedmohammed evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT lombinlami evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy
AT nsubugapeter evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy