Cargando…
Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study
INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 was first reported in poultry in Nigeria in February 2006. The only human case that occurred was linked to contact with poultry in a live bird market (LBM). LBM surveillance was instituted to assess the degree of threat of human exposure to H5N1....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328630 http://dx.doi.org/10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4188 |
_version_ | 1782339892297072640 |
---|---|
author | Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie Nguku, Patrick Olayinka, Adebola Ajayi, Ike Kabir, Junaidu Okolocha, Emmanuel Tseggai, Tesfai Joannis, Tony Okewole, Phillip Kumbish, Peterside Ahmed, Mohammed Lombin, Lami Nsubuga, Peter |
author_facet | Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie Nguku, Patrick Olayinka, Adebola Ajayi, Ike Kabir, Junaidu Okolocha, Emmanuel Tseggai, Tesfai Joannis, Tony Okewole, Phillip Kumbish, Peterside Ahmed, Mohammed Lombin, Lami Nsubuga, Peter |
author_sort | Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 was first reported in poultry in Nigeria in February 2006. The only human case that occurred was linked to contact with poultry in a live bird market (LBM). LBM surveillance was instituted to assess the degree of threat of human exposure to H5N1. The key indicator was detection of H5N1 in LBMs. We evaluated the surveillance system to assess its operations and attributes. METHODS: We used the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. We reviewed and analyzed passive surveillance data for HPAI (January 2006-March 2009) from the Avian Influenza National Reference Laboratory, and live bird market surveillance data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nigeria. We interviewed key stakeholders and reviewed reports of live bird market surveillance to obtain additional information on the operations of the system. We assessed the key system attributes. RESULTS: A total of 299 cases occurred in 25 (72%) states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The system detected HPAI H5N1 virus in 7 (9.5%) LBMs; 2 (29%) of which were from 2 (18.2%) states with no previous case. A total of 17,852 (91.5%) of samples arrived at the laboratory within 24 hours but laboratory analysis took over 7 days. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 15.4% and 66.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: The system is useful, flexible, complex and not timely, but appears to be meeting its objectives. The isolation of HPAI H5N1 virus in some of these markets is an indication that the markets are possible reservoirs of the virus in Nigeria. We recommend that the Federal Government of Nigeria should dedicate more funds for surveillance for HPAI as this will aid early warning and reduce the risk of a pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4199346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41993462014-10-17 Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie Nguku, Patrick Olayinka, Adebola Ajayi, Ike Kabir, Junaidu Okolocha, Emmanuel Tseggai, Tesfai Joannis, Tony Okewole, Phillip Kumbish, Peterside Ahmed, Mohammed Lombin, Lami Nsubuga, Peter Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 was first reported in poultry in Nigeria in February 2006. The only human case that occurred was linked to contact with poultry in a live bird market (LBM). LBM surveillance was instituted to assess the degree of threat of human exposure to H5N1. The key indicator was detection of H5N1 in LBMs. We evaluated the surveillance system to assess its operations and attributes. METHODS: We used the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. We reviewed and analyzed passive surveillance data for HPAI (January 2006-March 2009) from the Avian Influenza National Reference Laboratory, and live bird market surveillance data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nigeria. We interviewed key stakeholders and reviewed reports of live bird market surveillance to obtain additional information on the operations of the system. We assessed the key system attributes. RESULTS: A total of 299 cases occurred in 25 (72%) states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The system detected HPAI H5N1 virus in 7 (9.5%) LBMs; 2 (29%) of which were from 2 (18.2%) states with no previous case. A total of 17,852 (91.5%) of samples arrived at the laboratory within 24 hours but laboratory analysis took over 7 days. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 15.4% and 66.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: The system is useful, flexible, complex and not timely, but appears to be meeting its objectives. The isolation of HPAI H5N1 virus in some of these markets is an indication that the markets are possible reservoirs of the virus in Nigeria. We recommend that the Federal Government of Nigeria should dedicate more funds for surveillance for HPAI as this will aid early warning and reduce the risk of a pandemic. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4199346/ /pubmed/25328630 http://dx.doi.org/10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4188 Text en © Ndadilnasiya Endie Waziri et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie Nguku, Patrick Olayinka, Adebola Ajayi, Ike Kabir, Junaidu Okolocha, Emmanuel Tseggai, Tesfai Joannis, Tony Okewole, Phillip Kumbish, Peterside Ahmed, Mohammed Lombin, Lami Nsubuga, Peter Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
title | Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
title_full | Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
title_short | Evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
title_sort | evaluating a surveillance system: live-bird market surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza, a case study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328630 http://dx.doi.org/10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wazirindadilnasiyaendie evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT ngukupatrick evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT olayinkaadebola evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT ajayiike evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT kabirjunaidu evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT okolochaemmanuel evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT tseggaitesfai evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT joannistony evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT okewolephillip evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT kumbishpeterside evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT ahmedmohammed evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT lombinlami evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy AT nsubugapeter evaluatingasurveillancesystemlivebirdmarketsurveillanceforhighlypathogenicavianinfluenzaacasestudy |