Cargando…
Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability
INTRODUCTION: Choice of outcomes is critical for clinical trialists and systematic reviewers. It is currently unclear how systematic reviewers choose and pre-specify outcomes for systematic reviews. Our objective was to assess the completeness of pre-specification and comparability of outcomes in al...
Autores principales: | Saldanha, Ian J., Dickersin, Kay, Wang, Xue, Li, Tianjing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109400 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cochrane systematic reviews and co-publication: dissemination of evidence on interventions for ophthalmic conditions
por: Wang, Xue, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food security: protocol for a methodological study
por: Durão, Solange, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Cochrane Eyes and Vision: systematic reviews on myopia
por: Evans, Jennifer
Publicado: (2019) -
Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
por: Mayo‐Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)