Cargando…

Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone

OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after os...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas, Anderson, Maciel, Rafael Almeida, Lima, Renato De Almeida, Souto, Diogo Ranier De Macedo, Ferrer, Marcelo De Almeida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220500922
_version_ 1782339946535714816
author Freitas, Anderson
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Lima, Renato De Almeida
Souto, Diogo Ranier De Macedo
Ferrer, Marcelo De Almeida
author_facet Freitas, Anderson
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Lima, Renato De Almeida
Souto, Diogo Ranier De Macedo
Ferrer, Marcelo De Almeida
author_sort Freitas, Anderson
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after osteotomy at 70(o) tilt using DCS plate with four holes. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm displacement and rotational deviation (Step 1) and with10 mm (Step 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: The values of the test group in Step 1 showed a mean of 974N and SD = 114N. In Stage 2, we obtained on average 1335N and SD = 98N. The values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the maximum force (N) between the test group and the control, in Step 2, demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the DCS and control plates (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between the DCS boards and the control group exposed to full resistance. Level of Evidence III, Case Control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4199644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41996442014-10-17 Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone Freitas, Anderson Maciel, Rafael Almeida Lima, Renato De Almeida Souto, Diogo Ranier De Macedo Ferrer, Marcelo De Almeida Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after osteotomy at 70(o) tilt using DCS plate with four holes. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm displacement and rotational deviation (Step 1) and with10 mm (Step 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: The values of the test group in Step 1 showed a mean of 974N and SD = 114N. In Stage 2, we obtained on average 1335N and SD = 98N. The values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the maximum force (N) between the test group and the control, in Step 2, demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the DCS and control plates (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between the DCS boards and the control group exposed to full resistance. Level of Evidence III, Case Control. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4199644/ /pubmed/25328435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220500922 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Freitas, Anderson
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Lima, Renato De Almeida
Souto, Diogo Ranier De Macedo
Ferrer, Marcelo De Almeida
Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_full Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_fullStr Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_short Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
title_sort mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25328435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220500922
work_keys_str_mv AT freitasanderson mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationwithdynamiccondylarscrewinsyntheticbone
AT macielrafaelalmeida mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationwithdynamiccondylarscrewinsyntheticbone
AT limarenatodealmeida mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationwithdynamiccondylarscrewinsyntheticbone
AT soutodiogoranierdemacedo mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationwithdynamiccondylarscrewinsyntheticbone
AT ferrermarcelodealmeida mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationwithdynamiccondylarscrewinsyntheticbone