Cargando…
How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
Protein-protein interactions (PPI) in nature are conveyed by a multitude of binding modes involving various surfaces, secondary structure elements and intermolecular interactions. This diversity results in PPI binding affinities that span more than nine orders of magnitude. Several early studies att...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110085 |
_version_ | 1782339963851898880 |
---|---|
author | Erijman, Ariel Rosenthal, Eran Shifman, Julia M. |
author_facet | Erijman, Ariel Rosenthal, Eran Shifman, Julia M. |
author_sort | Erijman, Ariel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein-protein interactions (PPI) in nature are conveyed by a multitude of binding modes involving various surfaces, secondary structure elements and intermolecular interactions. This diversity results in PPI binding affinities that span more than nine orders of magnitude. Several early studies attempted to correlate PPI binding affinities to various structure-derived features with limited success. The growing number of high-resolution structures, the appearance of more precise methods for measuring binding affinities and the development of new computational algorithms enable more thorough investigations in this direction. Here, we use a large dataset of PPI structures with the documented binding affinities to calculate a number of structure-based features that could potentially define binding energetics. We explore how well each calculated biophysical feature alone correlates with binding affinity and determine the features that could be used to distinguish between high-, medium- and low- affinity PPIs. Furthermore, we test how various combinations of features could be applied to predict binding affinity and observe a slow improvement in correlation as more features are incorporated into the equation. In addition, we observe a considerable improvement in predictions if we exclude from our analysis low-resolution and NMR structures, revealing the importance of capturing exact intermolecular interactions in our calculations. Our analysis should facilitate prediction of new interactions on the genome scale, better characterization of signaling networks and design of novel binding partners for various target proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4199723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41997232014-10-21 How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions Erijman, Ariel Rosenthal, Eran Shifman, Julia M. PLoS One Research Article Protein-protein interactions (PPI) in nature are conveyed by a multitude of binding modes involving various surfaces, secondary structure elements and intermolecular interactions. This diversity results in PPI binding affinities that span more than nine orders of magnitude. Several early studies attempted to correlate PPI binding affinities to various structure-derived features with limited success. The growing number of high-resolution structures, the appearance of more precise methods for measuring binding affinities and the development of new computational algorithms enable more thorough investigations in this direction. Here, we use a large dataset of PPI structures with the documented binding affinities to calculate a number of structure-based features that could potentially define binding energetics. We explore how well each calculated biophysical feature alone correlates with binding affinity and determine the features that could be used to distinguish between high-, medium- and low- affinity PPIs. Furthermore, we test how various combinations of features could be applied to predict binding affinity and observe a slow improvement in correlation as more features are incorporated into the equation. In addition, we observe a considerable improvement in predictions if we exclude from our analysis low-resolution and NMR structures, revealing the importance of capturing exact intermolecular interactions in our calculations. Our analysis should facilitate prediction of new interactions on the genome scale, better characterization of signaling networks and design of novel binding partners for various target proteins. Public Library of Science 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4199723/ /pubmed/25329579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110085 Text en © 2014 Erijman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Erijman, Ariel Rosenthal, Eran Shifman, Julia M. How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions |
title | How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions |
title_full | How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions |
title_fullStr | How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions |
title_short | How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions |
title_sort | how structure defines affinity in protein-protein interactions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erijmanariel howstructuredefinesaffinityinproteinproteininteractions AT rosenthaleran howstructuredefinesaffinityinproteinproteininteractions AT shifmanjuliam howstructuredefinesaffinityinproteinproteininteractions |