Cargando…

How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions

Protein-protein interactions (PPI) in nature are conveyed by a multitude of binding modes involving various surfaces, secondary structure elements and intermolecular interactions. This diversity results in PPI binding affinities that span more than nine orders of magnitude. Several early studies att...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erijman, Ariel, Rosenthal, Eran, Shifman, Julia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110085
_version_ 1782339963851898880
author Erijman, Ariel
Rosenthal, Eran
Shifman, Julia M.
author_facet Erijman, Ariel
Rosenthal, Eran
Shifman, Julia M.
author_sort Erijman, Ariel
collection PubMed
description Protein-protein interactions (PPI) in nature are conveyed by a multitude of binding modes involving various surfaces, secondary structure elements and intermolecular interactions. This diversity results in PPI binding affinities that span more than nine orders of magnitude. Several early studies attempted to correlate PPI binding affinities to various structure-derived features with limited success. The growing number of high-resolution structures, the appearance of more precise methods for measuring binding affinities and the development of new computational algorithms enable more thorough investigations in this direction. Here, we use a large dataset of PPI structures with the documented binding affinities to calculate a number of structure-based features that could potentially define binding energetics. We explore how well each calculated biophysical feature alone correlates with binding affinity and determine the features that could be used to distinguish between high-, medium- and low- affinity PPIs. Furthermore, we test how various combinations of features could be applied to predict binding affinity and observe a slow improvement in correlation as more features are incorporated into the equation. In addition, we observe a considerable improvement in predictions if we exclude from our analysis low-resolution and NMR structures, revealing the importance of capturing exact intermolecular interactions in our calculations. Our analysis should facilitate prediction of new interactions on the genome scale, better characterization of signaling networks and design of novel binding partners for various target proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4199723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41997232014-10-21 How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions Erijman, Ariel Rosenthal, Eran Shifman, Julia M. PLoS One Research Article Protein-protein interactions (PPI) in nature are conveyed by a multitude of binding modes involving various surfaces, secondary structure elements and intermolecular interactions. This diversity results in PPI binding affinities that span more than nine orders of magnitude. Several early studies attempted to correlate PPI binding affinities to various structure-derived features with limited success. The growing number of high-resolution structures, the appearance of more precise methods for measuring binding affinities and the development of new computational algorithms enable more thorough investigations in this direction. Here, we use a large dataset of PPI structures with the documented binding affinities to calculate a number of structure-based features that could potentially define binding energetics. We explore how well each calculated biophysical feature alone correlates with binding affinity and determine the features that could be used to distinguish between high-, medium- and low- affinity PPIs. Furthermore, we test how various combinations of features could be applied to predict binding affinity and observe a slow improvement in correlation as more features are incorporated into the equation. In addition, we observe a considerable improvement in predictions if we exclude from our analysis low-resolution and NMR structures, revealing the importance of capturing exact intermolecular interactions in our calculations. Our analysis should facilitate prediction of new interactions on the genome scale, better characterization of signaling networks and design of novel binding partners for various target proteins. Public Library of Science 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4199723/ /pubmed/25329579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110085 Text en © 2014 Erijman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Erijman, Ariel
Rosenthal, Eran
Shifman, Julia M.
How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
title How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
title_full How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
title_fullStr How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
title_full_unstemmed How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
title_short How Structure Defines Affinity in Protein-Protein Interactions
title_sort how structure defines affinity in protein-protein interactions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110085
work_keys_str_mv AT erijmanariel howstructuredefinesaffinityinproteinproteininteractions
AT rosenthaleran howstructuredefinesaffinityinproteinproteininteractions
AT shifmanjuliam howstructuredefinesaffinityinproteinproteininteractions