Cargando…
Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is widespread and has significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Eyelid hygiene is the mainstay of treatment but is unstandardized and requires commitment from the patient and encouragement from the ophthalmologist. Blephasteam(®) is an eyelid warming device d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25336900 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S68201 |
_version_ | 1782339982410645504 |
---|---|
author | Benitez del Castillo, José Manuel Kaercher, Thomas Mansour, Khaled Wylegala, Edward Dua, Harminder |
author_facet | Benitez del Castillo, José Manuel Kaercher, Thomas Mansour, Khaled Wylegala, Edward Dua, Harminder |
author_sort | Benitez del Castillo, José Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is widespread and has significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Eyelid hygiene is the mainstay of treatment but is unstandardized and requires commitment from the patient and encouragement from the ophthalmologist. Blephasteam(®) is an eyelid warming device designed to be an easy-to-use and standardized treatment for MGD. In the present study, 73 patients were treated for 21 days with twice daily Blephasteam(®) sessions. The primary efficacy variable, a symptomatology visual analog scale score, declined from 63.07±21.23 (mean ± standard deviation) on day 0 to 41.90±25.49 on day 21. There were also improvements in a number of secondary efficacy variables including subjective ocular symptoms and clinical signs and symptoms of MGD and dry eye, though tear film breakup time and tear osmolarity were not improved. Global efficacy was assessed as satisfactory or very satisfactory in 83.8% of cases. Patient-reported subjective ocular symptoms declined during the study, and a majority of patients rated the efficacy of Blephasteam(®) as satisfactory or very satisfactory. Most patients found the device comfortable and were able to continue with normal activities (reading, watching TV, using a computer) during the Blephasteam(®) session. No safety or tolerability issues were identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4199825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41998252014-10-21 Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction Benitez del Castillo, José Manuel Kaercher, Thomas Mansour, Khaled Wylegala, Edward Dua, Harminder Clin Ophthalmol Original Research Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is widespread and has significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Eyelid hygiene is the mainstay of treatment but is unstandardized and requires commitment from the patient and encouragement from the ophthalmologist. Blephasteam(®) is an eyelid warming device designed to be an easy-to-use and standardized treatment for MGD. In the present study, 73 patients were treated for 21 days with twice daily Blephasteam(®) sessions. The primary efficacy variable, a symptomatology visual analog scale score, declined from 63.07±21.23 (mean ± standard deviation) on day 0 to 41.90±25.49 on day 21. There were also improvements in a number of secondary efficacy variables including subjective ocular symptoms and clinical signs and symptoms of MGD and dry eye, though tear film breakup time and tear osmolarity were not improved. Global efficacy was assessed as satisfactory or very satisfactory in 83.8% of cases. Patient-reported subjective ocular symptoms declined during the study, and a majority of patients rated the efficacy of Blephasteam(®) as satisfactory or very satisfactory. Most patients found the device comfortable and were able to continue with normal activities (reading, watching TV, using a computer) during the Blephasteam(®) session. No safety or tolerability issues were identified. Dove Medical Press 2014-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4199825/ /pubmed/25336900 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S68201 Text en © 2014 Benitez del Castillo et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Benitez del Castillo, José Manuel Kaercher, Thomas Mansour, Khaled Wylegala, Edward Dua, Harminder Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
title | Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
title_full | Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
title_short | Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
title_sort | evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25336900 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S68201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benitezdelcastillojosemanuel evaluationoftheefficacysafetyandacceptabilityofaneyelidwarmingdeviceforthetreatmentofmeibomianglanddysfunction AT kaercherthomas evaluationoftheefficacysafetyandacceptabilityofaneyelidwarmingdeviceforthetreatmentofmeibomianglanddysfunction AT mansourkhaled evaluationoftheefficacysafetyandacceptabilityofaneyelidwarmingdeviceforthetreatmentofmeibomianglanddysfunction AT wylegalaedward evaluationoftheefficacysafetyandacceptabilityofaneyelidwarmingdeviceforthetreatmentofmeibomianglanddysfunction AT duaharminder evaluationoftheefficacysafetyandacceptabilityofaneyelidwarmingdeviceforthetreatmentofmeibomianglanddysfunction |