Cargando…

Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade

Spinal and epidural blocks are common practice in anesthesia and are usually used for various surgical or endoscopic procedures. Correct identification and puncture of the epidural or subarachnoid space determine the success or failure of the technique. Multiple attempts and difficult access to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ružman, Tomislav, Gulam, Danijela, Haršanji Drenjančević, Ivana, Venžera-Azenić, Darija, Ružman, Nataša, Burazin, Jelena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25336987
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S68451
_version_ 1782340005038915584
author Ružman, Tomislav
Gulam, Danijela
Haršanji Drenjančević, Ivana
Venžera-Azenić, Darija
Ružman, Nataša
Burazin, Jelena
author_facet Ružman, Tomislav
Gulam, Danijela
Haršanji Drenjančević, Ivana
Venžera-Azenić, Darija
Ružman, Nataša
Burazin, Jelena
author_sort Ružman, Tomislav
collection PubMed
description Spinal and epidural blocks are common practice in anesthesia and are usually used for various surgical or endoscopic procedures. Correct identification and puncture of the epidural or subarachnoid space determine the success or failure of the technique. Multiple attempts and difficult access to the epidural or subarachnoid space is a frequent problem in operating theaters and may be hazardous due to a number of possible acute or long-term complications. In addition, multiple punctures are associated with increased pain and patient discomfort. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with a difficult spinal or epidural block, dependent on the patient (age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and quality of anatomical landmarks), the technique (type of blockade, needle gauge, and patient positioning), and the provider (level of experience). The study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care Unit of University Hospital Osijek (Osijek, Croatia) and it included 316 patients who underwent a range of different surgical procedures in neuraxial blocks. There were 219 cases of first puncture success, while the overall success of neuraxial blocks was 97.5%. Five patients (1.6%) were submitted to the alternative technique, ie, general anesthesia. In three patients (0.9%), neuraxial block was partial so they required supplementation of intravenous anesthetics and analgesics. Furthermore, it was found that first puncture success was associated with younger age (P=0.007), lower weight (P=0.032), and body mass index (P=0.020). Spine deformity (P=0.015), poor identification of interspinous space (P=0.005), recumbent patient position during the puncture (P=0.001), and use of a paramedian approach were associated with first puncture failure. Adequate preoperative prediction of difficulties can help to reduce the incidence of multiple attempts, rendering the technique more acceptable and less risky to the patient, and consequently leading to improvement of medical care quality. The attending anesthesiologist should consider an alternative technique (general anesthesia or peripheral nerve block) for a patient if certain difficulties can be predicted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4200041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42000412014-10-21 Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade Ružman, Tomislav Gulam, Danijela Haršanji Drenjančević, Ivana Venžera-Azenić, Darija Ružman, Nataša Burazin, Jelena Local Reg Anesth Original Research Spinal and epidural blocks are common practice in anesthesia and are usually used for various surgical or endoscopic procedures. Correct identification and puncture of the epidural or subarachnoid space determine the success or failure of the technique. Multiple attempts and difficult access to the epidural or subarachnoid space is a frequent problem in operating theaters and may be hazardous due to a number of possible acute or long-term complications. In addition, multiple punctures are associated with increased pain and patient discomfort. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with a difficult spinal or epidural block, dependent on the patient (age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and quality of anatomical landmarks), the technique (type of blockade, needle gauge, and patient positioning), and the provider (level of experience). The study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care Unit of University Hospital Osijek (Osijek, Croatia) and it included 316 patients who underwent a range of different surgical procedures in neuraxial blocks. There were 219 cases of first puncture success, while the overall success of neuraxial blocks was 97.5%. Five patients (1.6%) were submitted to the alternative technique, ie, general anesthesia. In three patients (0.9%), neuraxial block was partial so they required supplementation of intravenous anesthetics and analgesics. Furthermore, it was found that first puncture success was associated with younger age (P=0.007), lower weight (P=0.032), and body mass index (P=0.020). Spine deformity (P=0.015), poor identification of interspinous space (P=0.005), recumbent patient position during the puncture (P=0.001), and use of a paramedian approach were associated with first puncture failure. Adequate preoperative prediction of difficulties can help to reduce the incidence of multiple attempts, rendering the technique more acceptable and less risky to the patient, and consequently leading to improvement of medical care quality. The attending anesthesiologist should consider an alternative technique (general anesthesia or peripheral nerve block) for a patient if certain difficulties can be predicted. Dove Medical Press 2014-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4200041/ /pubmed/25336987 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S68451 Text en © 2014 Ružman et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ružman, Tomislav
Gulam, Danijela
Haršanji Drenjančević, Ivana
Venžera-Azenić, Darija
Ružman, Nataša
Burazin, Jelena
Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
title Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
title_full Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
title_fullStr Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
title_short Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
title_sort factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25336987
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S68451
work_keys_str_mv AT ruzmantomislav factorsassociatedwithdifficultneuraxialblockade
AT gulamdanijela factorsassociatedwithdifficultneuraxialblockade
AT harsanjidrenjancevicivana factorsassociatedwithdifficultneuraxialblockade
AT venzeraazenicdarija factorsassociatedwithdifficultneuraxialblockade
AT ruzmannatasa factorsassociatedwithdifficultneuraxialblockade
AT burazinjelena factorsassociatedwithdifficultneuraxialblockade