Cargando…

Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) is a self-limiting, benign, painful and impairing condition caused by lumbar disc herniation and inflammatory processes around the nerve root. Segmental epidural steroid injections (SESIs) are helpful to reduce radicular pain on a short-term basis. It...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spijker-Huiges, Antje, Winters, Jan C, van Wijhe, Marten, Groenier, Klaas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-341
_version_ 1782340040363343872
author Spijker-Huiges, Antje
Winters, Jan C
van Wijhe, Marten
Groenier, Klaas
author_facet Spijker-Huiges, Antje
Winters, Jan C
van Wijhe, Marten
Groenier, Klaas
author_sort Spijker-Huiges, Antje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) is a self-limiting, benign, painful and impairing condition caused by lumbar disc herniation and inflammatory processes around the nerve root. Segmental epidural steroid injections (SESIs) are helpful to reduce radicular pain on a short-term basis. It is unknown whether SESIs are an effective addition to usual pain treatment of LRS in general practice. In our study, we assessed the effectiveness of SESIs on pain and disability as an addition to usual care for acute LRS in general practice. METHODS: A pragmatic, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practice was conducted. Circumstances of daily practice were closely followed. Care as usual (CAU) was compared to care as usual combined with an additional SESI in 63 patients in the acute phase of LRS. To detect a minimal clinically important difference of 1.2 points on a numerical rating scale for back pain and a common within-group standard deviation of 1.7 with a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, we needed 33 subjects in each group. Statistical analysis was carried out using mixed models. RESULTS: A small significant effect in favour of the intervention, corrected for age, sex and baseline values, was found for back pain, impairment and Roland-Morris disability score. The differences, though statistically significant, were too small to be considered clinically relevant. Patients from the intervention group were significantly more satisfied with the received treatment than patients from the control group. CONCLUSION: We found a small, statistically significant, but not clinically relevant positive effect of SESIs on back pain, impairment and disability in acute LRS. We do not recommend implementing SESIs as an additional regular treatment option in general practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-341) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4200234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42002342014-10-18 Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice Spijker-Huiges, Antje Winters, Jan C van Wijhe, Marten Groenier, Klaas BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) is a self-limiting, benign, painful and impairing condition caused by lumbar disc herniation and inflammatory processes around the nerve root. Segmental epidural steroid injections (SESIs) are helpful to reduce radicular pain on a short-term basis. It is unknown whether SESIs are an effective addition to usual pain treatment of LRS in general practice. In our study, we assessed the effectiveness of SESIs on pain and disability as an addition to usual care for acute LRS in general practice. METHODS: A pragmatic, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practice was conducted. Circumstances of daily practice were closely followed. Care as usual (CAU) was compared to care as usual combined with an additional SESI in 63 patients in the acute phase of LRS. To detect a minimal clinically important difference of 1.2 points on a numerical rating scale for back pain and a common within-group standard deviation of 1.7 with a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, we needed 33 subjects in each group. Statistical analysis was carried out using mixed models. RESULTS: A small significant effect in favour of the intervention, corrected for age, sex and baseline values, was found for back pain, impairment and Roland-Morris disability score. The differences, though statistically significant, were too small to be considered clinically relevant. Patients from the intervention group were significantly more satisfied with the received treatment than patients from the control group. CONCLUSION: We found a small, statistically significant, but not clinically relevant positive effect of SESIs on back pain, impairment and disability in acute LRS. We do not recommend implementing SESIs as an additional regular treatment option in general practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-341) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4200234/ /pubmed/25304934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-341 Text en © Spijker-Huiges et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spijker-Huiges, Antje
Winters, Jan C
van Wijhe, Marten
Groenier, Klaas
Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
title Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
title_full Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
title_fullStr Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
title_short Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
title_sort steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-341
work_keys_str_mv AT spijkerhuigesantje steroidinjectionsaddedtotheusualtreatmentoflumbarradicularsyndromeapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialingeneralpractice
AT wintersjanc steroidinjectionsaddedtotheusualtreatmentoflumbarradicularsyndromeapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialingeneralpractice
AT vanwijhemarten steroidinjectionsaddedtotheusualtreatmentoflumbarradicularsyndromeapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialingeneralpractice
AT groenierklaas steroidinjectionsaddedtotheusualtreatmentoflumbarradicularsyndromeapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrialingeneralpractice