Cargando…
Pro/con clinical debate: Steroids are a key component in the treatment of SARS
SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) proved an enormous physical and emotional challenge to frontline health care workers throughout the world in late 2002 through to mid 2003. A large percentage of patients (many being health care workers themselves) became critically ill. Unfortunately, clinic...
Autores principales: | Gomersall, Charles D, Kargel, Marcus J, Lapinsky, Stephen E |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15025770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2452 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pro/con debate: Should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?
por: Downar, James, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Pro/con clinical debate: pulmonary artery catheters increase the morbidity and mortality of intensive care unit patients
por: Lapinsky, Stephen E, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Pro/con clinical debate: Are steroids useful in the management of patients with septic shock?
por: Ritacca, Frank V, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
por: Whetstine, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Pro/con clinical debate: Is high-volume hemofiltration beneficial in the treatment of septic shock?
por: Reiter, Karl, et al.
Publicado: (2002)