Cargando…
To plug or not to plug?
Coronary artery disease remains a common problem in industrialized countries. Percutaneous coronary interventions are usually performed utilizing the femoral approach. Arterial puncture-closing devices have been developed in hope to avoid manual compression and shortening the period of rest. In a re...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15025762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2829 |
_version_ | 1782121457495572480 |
---|---|
author | Varon, Joseph Fromm, Robert E |
author_facet | Varon, Joseph Fromm, Robert E |
author_sort | Varon, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coronary artery disease remains a common problem in industrialized countries. Percutaneous coronary interventions are usually performed utilizing the femoral approach. Arterial puncture-closing devices have been developed in hope to avoid manual compression and shortening the period of rest. In a recent meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association these devices have shown only marginal benefits over manual compression. Further, well designed studies are necessary to document the comparative effects of these devices versus manual compression. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-420040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4200402004-06-04 To plug or not to plug? Varon, Joseph Fromm, Robert E Crit Care Commentary Coronary artery disease remains a common problem in industrialized countries. Percutaneous coronary interventions are usually performed utilizing the femoral approach. Arterial puncture-closing devices have been developed in hope to avoid manual compression and shortening the period of rest. In a recent meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association these devices have shown only marginal benefits over manual compression. Further, well designed studies are necessary to document the comparative effects of these devices versus manual compression. BioMed Central 2004 2004-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC420040/ /pubmed/15025762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2829 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Varon, Joseph Fromm, Robert E To plug or not to plug? |
title | To plug or not to plug? |
title_full | To plug or not to plug? |
title_fullStr | To plug or not to plug? |
title_full_unstemmed | To plug or not to plug? |
title_short | To plug or not to plug? |
title_sort | to plug or not to plug? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15025762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varonjoseph toplugornottoplug AT frommroberte toplugornottoplug |