Cargando…
Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do
Granja and colleagues have helped us by showing that long-term follow-up is feasible and by trying to tease out whether select intensive care unit patient populations are at particular risk of adverse outcomes. This work gives us clues for future investigations which will hopefully interrogate furth...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15025769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2838 |
_version_ | 1782121458879692800 |
---|---|
author | Angus, Derek C |
author_facet | Angus, Derek C |
author_sort | Angus, Derek C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Granja and colleagues have helped us by showing that long-term follow-up is feasible and by trying to tease out whether select intensive care unit patient populations are at particular risk of adverse outcomes. This work gives us clues for future investigations which will hopefully interrogate further the potential mechanisms of action that underlie poor long-term outcomes. In the meantime, we can hope that this quality of follow-up will move from the research arena to become a part of routine clinical care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-420046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4200462004-06-04 Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do Angus, Derek C Crit Care Commentary Granja and colleagues have helped us by showing that long-term follow-up is feasible and by trying to tease out whether select intensive care unit patient populations are at particular risk of adverse outcomes. This work gives us clues for future investigations which will hopefully interrogate further the potential mechanisms of action that underlie poor long-term outcomes. In the meantime, we can hope that this quality of follow-up will move from the research arena to become a part of routine clinical care. BioMed Central 2004 2004-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC420046/ /pubmed/15025769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2838 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Angus, Derek C Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
title | Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
title_full | Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
title_fullStr | Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
title_short | Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
title_sort | understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15025769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angusderekc understandingthelingeringconsequencesofwhatwetreatandwhatwedo |