Cargando…

Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction

In this paper, we explore the effects of integrating multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease (AD) prediction using machine learning approaches. Precisely, we compare our three recent proposed feature selection methods [i.e., multiple kernel learning (MKL), high-order gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ziming, Huang, Heng, Shen, Dinggang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00260
_version_ 1782340133800902656
author Zhang, Ziming
Huang, Heng
Shen, Dinggang
author_facet Zhang, Ziming
Huang, Heng
Shen, Dinggang
author_sort Zhang, Ziming
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we explore the effects of integrating multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease (AD) prediction using machine learning approaches. Precisely, we compare our three recent proposed feature selection methods [i.e., multiple kernel learning (MKL), high-order graph matching based feature selection (HGM-FS), sparse multimodal learning (SMML)] using four widely-used modalities [i.e., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and genetic modality single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)]. This study demonstrates the performance of each method using these modalities individually or integratively, and may be valuable to clinical tests in practice. Our experimental results suggest that for AD prediction, in general, (1) in terms of accuracy, PET is the best modality; (2) Even though the discriminant power of genetic SNP features is weak, adding this modality to other modalities does help improve the classification accuracy; (3) HGM-FS works best among the three feature selection methods; (4) Some of the selected features are shared by all the feature selection methods, which may have high correlation with the disease. Using all the modalities on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, the best accuracies, described as (mean ± standard deviation)%, among the three methods are (76.2 ± 11.3)% for AD vs. MCI, (94.8 ± 7.3)% for AD vs. HC, (76.5 ± 11.1)% for MCI vs. HC, and (71.0 ± 8.4)% for AD vs. MCI vs. HC, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4201101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42011012014-11-03 Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction Zhang, Ziming Huang, Heng Shen, Dinggang Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience In this paper, we explore the effects of integrating multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease (AD) prediction using machine learning approaches. Precisely, we compare our three recent proposed feature selection methods [i.e., multiple kernel learning (MKL), high-order graph matching based feature selection (HGM-FS), sparse multimodal learning (SMML)] using four widely-used modalities [i.e., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and genetic modality single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)]. This study demonstrates the performance of each method using these modalities individually or integratively, and may be valuable to clinical tests in practice. Our experimental results suggest that for AD prediction, in general, (1) in terms of accuracy, PET is the best modality; (2) Even though the discriminant power of genetic SNP features is weak, adding this modality to other modalities does help improve the classification accuracy; (3) HGM-FS works best among the three feature selection methods; (4) Some of the selected features are shared by all the feature selection methods, which may have high correlation with the disease. Using all the modalities on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, the best accuracies, described as (mean ± standard deviation)%, among the three methods are (76.2 ± 11.3)% for AD vs. MCI, (94.8 ± 7.3)% for AD vs. HC, (76.5 ± 11.1)% for MCI vs. HC, and (71.0 ± 8.4)% for AD vs. MCI vs. HC, respectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4201101/ /pubmed/25368574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00260 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zhang, Huang, Shen and The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zhang, Ziming
Huang, Heng
Shen, Dinggang
Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
title Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
title_full Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
title_fullStr Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
title_full_unstemmed Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
title_short Integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
title_sort integrative analysis of multi-dimensional imaging genomics data for alzheimer's disease prediction
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00260
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangziming integrativeanalysisofmultidimensionalimaginggenomicsdataforalzheimersdiseaseprediction
AT huangheng integrativeanalysisofmultidimensionalimaginggenomicsdataforalzheimersdiseaseprediction
AT shendinggang integrativeanalysisofmultidimensionalimaginggenomicsdataforalzheimersdiseaseprediction
AT integrativeanalysisofmultidimensionalimaginggenomicsdataforalzheimersdiseaseprediction