Cargando…

Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI before and after mathematic contrast leakage correction in differentiating pyogenic brain abscesses from glioblastomas and/or metastatic brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cerebral blood volume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toh, Cheng Hong, Wei, Kuo-Chen, Chang, Chen-Nen, Ng, Shu-Hang, Wong, Ho-Fai, Lin, Ching-Po
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25330386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109172
_version_ 1782340173544030208
author Toh, Cheng Hong
Wei, Kuo-Chen
Chang, Chen-Nen
Ng, Shu-Hang
Wong, Ho-Fai
Lin, Ching-Po
author_facet Toh, Cheng Hong
Wei, Kuo-Chen
Chang, Chen-Nen
Ng, Shu-Hang
Wong, Ho-Fai
Lin, Ching-Po
author_sort Toh, Cheng Hong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI before and after mathematic contrast leakage correction in differentiating pyogenic brain abscesses from glioblastomas and/or metastatic brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cerebral blood volume (CBV), leakage-corrected CBV and leakage coefficient K(2) were measured in enhancing rims, perifocal edema and contralateral normal appearing white matter (NAWM) of 17 abscesses, 19 glioblastomas and 20 metastases, respectively. The CBV and corrected CBV were normalized by dividing the values in the enhancing rims or edema to those of contralateral NAWM. For each study group, a paired t test was used to compare the K(2) of the enhancing rims or edema with those of NAWM, as well as between CBV and corrected CBV of the enhancing rims or edema. ANOVA was used to compare CBV, corrected CBV and K(2) among three lesion types. The diagnostic performance of CBV and corrected CBV was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The CBV and correction CBV of enhancing rim were 1.45±1.17 and 1.97±1.01 for abscesses, 3.85±2.19 and 4.39±2.33 for glioblastomas, and 2.39±0.90 and 2.97±0.78 for metastases, respectively. The CBV and corrected CBV in the enhancing rim of abscesses were significantly lower than those of glioblastomas and metastases (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). In differentiating abscesses from glioblastomas and metastases, the AUC values of corrected CBV (0.822) were slightly higher than those of CBV (0.792). CONCLUSIONS: Mathematic leakage correction slightly increases the diagnostic performance of CBV in differentiating pyogenic abscesses from necrotic glioblastomas and cystic metastases. Clinically, DSC perfusion MRI may not need mathematic leakage correction in differentiating abscesses from glioblastomas and/or metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4201450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42014502014-10-21 Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction Toh, Cheng Hong Wei, Kuo-Chen Chang, Chen-Nen Ng, Shu-Hang Wong, Ho-Fai Lin, Ching-Po PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI before and after mathematic contrast leakage correction in differentiating pyogenic brain abscesses from glioblastomas and/or metastatic brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cerebral blood volume (CBV), leakage-corrected CBV and leakage coefficient K(2) were measured in enhancing rims, perifocal edema and contralateral normal appearing white matter (NAWM) of 17 abscesses, 19 glioblastomas and 20 metastases, respectively. The CBV and corrected CBV were normalized by dividing the values in the enhancing rims or edema to those of contralateral NAWM. For each study group, a paired t test was used to compare the K(2) of the enhancing rims or edema with those of NAWM, as well as between CBV and corrected CBV of the enhancing rims or edema. ANOVA was used to compare CBV, corrected CBV and K(2) among three lesion types. The diagnostic performance of CBV and corrected CBV was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The CBV and correction CBV of enhancing rim were 1.45±1.17 and 1.97±1.01 for abscesses, 3.85±2.19 and 4.39±2.33 for glioblastomas, and 2.39±0.90 and 2.97±0.78 for metastases, respectively. The CBV and corrected CBV in the enhancing rim of abscesses were significantly lower than those of glioblastomas and metastases (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). In differentiating abscesses from glioblastomas and metastases, the AUC values of corrected CBV (0.822) were slightly higher than those of CBV (0.792). CONCLUSIONS: Mathematic leakage correction slightly increases the diagnostic performance of CBV in differentiating pyogenic abscesses from necrotic glioblastomas and cystic metastases. Clinically, DSC perfusion MRI may not need mathematic leakage correction in differentiating abscesses from glioblastomas and/or metastases. Public Library of Science 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4201450/ /pubmed/25330386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109172 Text en © 2014 Toh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Toh, Cheng Hong
Wei, Kuo-Chen
Chang, Chen-Nen
Ng, Shu-Hang
Wong, Ho-Fai
Lin, Ching-Po
Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
title Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
title_full Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
title_fullStr Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
title_short Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
title_sort differentiation of brain abscesses from glioblastomas and metastatic brain tumors: comparisons of diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion mr imaging before and after mathematic contrast leakage correction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25330386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109172
work_keys_str_mv AT tohchenghong differentiationofbrainabscessesfromglioblastomasandmetastaticbraintumorscomparisonsofdiagnosticperformanceofdynamicsusceptibilitycontrastenhancedperfusionmrimagingbeforeandaftermathematiccontrastleakagecorrection
AT weikuochen differentiationofbrainabscessesfromglioblastomasandmetastaticbraintumorscomparisonsofdiagnosticperformanceofdynamicsusceptibilitycontrastenhancedperfusionmrimagingbeforeandaftermathematiccontrastleakagecorrection
AT changchennen differentiationofbrainabscessesfromglioblastomasandmetastaticbraintumorscomparisonsofdiagnosticperformanceofdynamicsusceptibilitycontrastenhancedperfusionmrimagingbeforeandaftermathematiccontrastleakagecorrection
AT ngshuhang differentiationofbrainabscessesfromglioblastomasandmetastaticbraintumorscomparisonsofdiagnosticperformanceofdynamicsusceptibilitycontrastenhancedperfusionmrimagingbeforeandaftermathematiccontrastleakagecorrection
AT wonghofai differentiationofbrainabscessesfromglioblastomasandmetastaticbraintumorscomparisonsofdiagnosticperformanceofdynamicsusceptibilitycontrastenhancedperfusionmrimagingbeforeandaftermathematiccontrastleakagecorrection
AT linchingpo differentiationofbrainabscessesfromglioblastomasandmetastaticbraintumorscomparisonsofdiagnosticperformanceofdynamicsusceptibilitycontrastenhancedperfusionmrimagingbeforeandaftermathematiccontrastleakagecorrection