Cargando…
Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial
BACKGROUND: The use of structured curricula for minimally invasive surgery training is becoming increasingly popular. However, many laparoscopic training programs still use basic skills and isolated task training, despite increasing evidence to support the use of training models with higher function...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-215 |
_version_ | 1782340220374482944 |
---|---|
author | Bjerrum, Flemming Sorensen, Jette Led Konge, Lars Lindschou, Jane Rosthøj, Susanne Ottesen, Bent Strandbygaard, Jeanett |
author_facet | Bjerrum, Flemming Sorensen, Jette Led Konge, Lars Lindschou, Jane Rosthøj, Susanne Ottesen, Bent Strandbygaard, Jeanett |
author_sort | Bjerrum, Flemming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of structured curricula for minimally invasive surgery training is becoming increasingly popular. However, many laparoscopic training programs still use basic skills and isolated task training, despite increasing evidence to support the use of training models with higher functional resemblance, such as whole procedural modules. In contrast to basic skills training, procedural training involves several cognitive skills such as elements of planning, movement integration, and how to avoid adverse events. The objective of this trial is to investigate the specificity of procedural practice in laparoscopic simulator training. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomised single-centre educational superiority trial. Participants are 96 surgical novices (medical students) without prior laparoscopic experience. Participants start by practicing a series of basic skills tasks to a predefined proficiency level on a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator. Upon reaching proficiency, the participants are randomised to either the intervention group, which practices two procedures (an appendectomy followed by a salpingectomy) or to the control group, practicing only one procedure (a salpingectomy) on the simulator. 1:1 central randomisation is used and participants are stratified by sex and time to complete the basic skills. Data collection is done at a surgical skills centre. The primary outcome is the number of repetitions required to reach a predefined proficiency level on the salpingectomy module. The secondary outcome is the total training time to proficiency. The improvement in motor skills and effect on cognitive load are also explored. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial might provide new knowledge on how the technical part of surgical training curricula should be comprised in the future. To examine the specificity of practice in procedural simulator training is of great importance in order to develop more comprehensive surgical curricula. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02069951 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4201735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42017352014-10-19 Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial Bjerrum, Flemming Sorensen, Jette Led Konge, Lars Lindschou, Jane Rosthøj, Susanne Ottesen, Bent Strandbygaard, Jeanett BMC Med Educ Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The use of structured curricula for minimally invasive surgery training is becoming increasingly popular. However, many laparoscopic training programs still use basic skills and isolated task training, despite increasing evidence to support the use of training models with higher functional resemblance, such as whole procedural modules. In contrast to basic skills training, procedural training involves several cognitive skills such as elements of planning, movement integration, and how to avoid adverse events. The objective of this trial is to investigate the specificity of procedural practice in laparoscopic simulator training. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomised single-centre educational superiority trial. Participants are 96 surgical novices (medical students) without prior laparoscopic experience. Participants start by practicing a series of basic skills tasks to a predefined proficiency level on a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator. Upon reaching proficiency, the participants are randomised to either the intervention group, which practices two procedures (an appendectomy followed by a salpingectomy) or to the control group, practicing only one procedure (a salpingectomy) on the simulator. 1:1 central randomisation is used and participants are stratified by sex and time to complete the basic skills. Data collection is done at a surgical skills centre. The primary outcome is the number of repetitions required to reach a predefined proficiency level on the salpingectomy module. The secondary outcome is the total training time to proficiency. The improvement in motor skills and effect on cognitive load are also explored. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial might provide new knowledge on how the technical part of surgical training curricula should be comprised in the future. To examine the specificity of practice in procedural simulator training is of great importance in order to develop more comprehensive surgical curricula. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02069951 BioMed Central 2014-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4201735/ /pubmed/25304939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-215 Text en © Bjerrum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bjerrum, Flemming Sorensen, Jette Led Konge, Lars Lindschou, Jane Rosthøj, Susanne Ottesen, Bent Strandbygaard, Jeanett Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
title | Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
title_full | Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
title_fullStr | Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
title_short | Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
title_sort | procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25304939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bjerrumflemming proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial AT sorensenjetteled proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial AT kongelars proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial AT lindschoujane proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial AT rosthøjsusanne proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial AT ottesenbent proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial AT strandbygaardjeanett proceduralspecificityinlaparoscopicsimulatortrainingprotocolforarandomisededucationalsuperioritytrial |