Cargando…
Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA
Messenger RNAs lacking a stop codon trap ribosomes at their 3′ ends, depleting the pool of ribosomes available for protein synthesis. In bacteria, a remarkable quality control system rescues and recycles stalled ribosomes in a process known as trans-translation. Acting as a tRNA, transfer-messenger...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.045773.114 |
_version_ | 1782340235852513280 |
---|---|
author | Kurita, Daisuke Miller, Mickey R. Muto, Akira Buskirk, Allen R. Himeno, Hyouta |
author_facet | Kurita, Daisuke Miller, Mickey R. Muto, Akira Buskirk, Allen R. Himeno, Hyouta |
author_sort | Kurita, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Messenger RNAs lacking a stop codon trap ribosomes at their 3′ ends, depleting the pool of ribosomes available for protein synthesis. In bacteria, a remarkable quality control system rescues and recycles stalled ribosomes in a process known as trans-translation. Acting as a tRNA, transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) is aminoacylated, delivered by EF-Tu to the ribosomal A site, and accepts the nascent polypeptide. Translation then resumes on a reading frame within tmRNA, encoding a short peptide tag that targets the nascent peptide for degradation by proteases. One unsolved issue in trans-translation is how tmRNA and its protein partner SmpB preferentially recognize stalled ribosomes and not actively translating ones. Here, we examine the effect of the length of the 3′ extension of mRNA on each step of trans-translation by pre-steady-state kinetic methods and fluorescence polarization binding assays. Unexpectedly, EF-Tu activation and GTP hydrolysis occur rapidly regardless of the length of the mRNA, although the peptidyl transfer to tmRNA decreases as the mRNA 3′ extension increases and the tmRNA·SmpB binds less tightly to the ribosome with an mRNA having a long 3′ extension. From these results, we conclude that the tmRNA·SmpB complex dissociates during accommodation due to competition between the downstream mRNA and the C-terminal tail for the mRNA channel. Rejection of the tmRNA·SmpB complex during accommodation is reminiscent of the rejection of near-cognate tRNA from the ribosome in canonical translation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4201823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42018232015-11-01 Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA Kurita, Daisuke Miller, Mickey R. Muto, Akira Buskirk, Allen R. Himeno, Hyouta RNA Report Messenger RNAs lacking a stop codon trap ribosomes at their 3′ ends, depleting the pool of ribosomes available for protein synthesis. In bacteria, a remarkable quality control system rescues and recycles stalled ribosomes in a process known as trans-translation. Acting as a tRNA, transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) is aminoacylated, delivered by EF-Tu to the ribosomal A site, and accepts the nascent polypeptide. Translation then resumes on a reading frame within tmRNA, encoding a short peptide tag that targets the nascent peptide for degradation by proteases. One unsolved issue in trans-translation is how tmRNA and its protein partner SmpB preferentially recognize stalled ribosomes and not actively translating ones. Here, we examine the effect of the length of the 3′ extension of mRNA on each step of trans-translation by pre-steady-state kinetic methods and fluorescence polarization binding assays. Unexpectedly, EF-Tu activation and GTP hydrolysis occur rapidly regardless of the length of the mRNA, although the peptidyl transfer to tmRNA decreases as the mRNA 3′ extension increases and the tmRNA·SmpB binds less tightly to the ribosome with an mRNA having a long 3′ extension. From these results, we conclude that the tmRNA·SmpB complex dissociates during accommodation due to competition between the downstream mRNA and the C-terminal tail for the mRNA channel. Rejection of the tmRNA·SmpB complex during accommodation is reminiscent of the rejection of near-cognate tRNA from the ribosome in canonical translation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4201823/ /pubmed/25246654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.045773.114 Text en © 2014 Kurita et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by the RNA Society for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Report Kurita, Daisuke Miller, Mickey R. Muto, Akira Buskirk, Allen R. Himeno, Hyouta Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA |
title | Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA |
title_full | Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA |
title_fullStr | Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA |
title_short | Rejection of tmRNA·SmpB after GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mRNA |
title_sort | rejection of tmrna·smpb after gtp hydrolysis by ef-tu on ribosomes stalled on intact mrna |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4201823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.045773.114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuritadaisuke rejectionoftmrnasmpbaftergtphydrolysisbyeftuonribosomesstalledonintactmrna AT millermickeyr rejectionoftmrnasmpbaftergtphydrolysisbyeftuonribosomesstalledonintactmrna AT mutoakira rejectionoftmrnasmpbaftergtphydrolysisbyeftuonribosomesstalledonintactmrna AT buskirkallenr rejectionoftmrnasmpbaftergtphydrolysisbyeftuonribosomesstalledonintactmrna AT himenohyouta rejectionoftmrnasmpbaftergtphydrolysisbyeftuonribosomesstalledonintactmrna |