Cargando…

Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of low birth weight is attributable to the mother's cultural and socioeconomic circumstances. Early childhood programmes have been widely developed to improve child outcomes. In the UK, the Health in Pregnancy (HiP) grant, a universal conditional cash tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dundas, Ruth, Ouédraogo, Samiratou, Bond, Lyndal, Briggs, Andrew H, Chalmers, James, Gray, Ron, Wood, Rachael, Leyland, Alastair H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25324327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006547
_version_ 1782340248995364864
author Dundas, Ruth
Ouédraogo, Samiratou
Bond, Lyndal
Briggs, Andrew H
Chalmers, James
Gray, Ron
Wood, Rachael
Leyland, Alastair H
author_facet Dundas, Ruth
Ouédraogo, Samiratou
Bond, Lyndal
Briggs, Andrew H
Chalmers, James
Gray, Ron
Wood, Rachael
Leyland, Alastair H
author_sort Dundas, Ruth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of low birth weight is attributable to the mother's cultural and socioeconomic circumstances. Early childhood programmes have been widely developed to improve child outcomes. In the UK, the Health in Pregnancy (HiP) grant, a universal conditional cash transfer of £190, was introduced for women reaching the 25th week of pregnancy with a due date on/or after 6 April 2009 and subsequently withdrawn for women reaching the 25th week of pregnancy on/or after 1 January 2011. The current study focuses on the evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the HiP grant. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The population under study will be all singleton births in Scotland over the periods of January 2004 to March 2009 (preintervention), April 2009 to April 2011 (intervention) and May 2011 to December 2013 (postintervention). Data will be extracted from the Scottish maternity and neonatal database. The analysis period 2004–2013 should yield over 585 000 births. The primary outcome will be birth weight among singleton births. Other secondary outcomes will include gestation at booking, booking before 25 weeks; measures of size and stage; gestational age at delivery; weight-for-dates, term at birth; birth outcomes and maternal smoking. The main statistical method we will use is interrupted time series. Outcomes will be measured on individual births nested within mothers, with mothers themselves clustered within data zones. Multilevel regression models will be used to determine whether the outcomes changed during the period in which the HiP grants was in effect. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for those groups most likely to benefit from the payments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for data collection, storage and release for research purpose has been given (6 May 2014, PAC38A/13) by the Privacy Advisory Committee. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in journals, national and international conferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4202003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42020032014-10-21 Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment Dundas, Ruth Ouédraogo, Samiratou Bond, Lyndal Briggs, Andrew H Chalmers, James Gray, Ron Wood, Rachael Leyland, Alastair H BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of low birth weight is attributable to the mother's cultural and socioeconomic circumstances. Early childhood programmes have been widely developed to improve child outcomes. In the UK, the Health in Pregnancy (HiP) grant, a universal conditional cash transfer of £190, was introduced for women reaching the 25th week of pregnancy with a due date on/or after 6 April 2009 and subsequently withdrawn for women reaching the 25th week of pregnancy on/or after 1 January 2011. The current study focuses on the evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the HiP grant. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The population under study will be all singleton births in Scotland over the periods of January 2004 to March 2009 (preintervention), April 2009 to April 2011 (intervention) and May 2011 to December 2013 (postintervention). Data will be extracted from the Scottish maternity and neonatal database. The analysis period 2004–2013 should yield over 585 000 births. The primary outcome will be birth weight among singleton births. Other secondary outcomes will include gestation at booking, booking before 25 weeks; measures of size and stage; gestational age at delivery; weight-for-dates, term at birth; birth outcomes and maternal smoking. The main statistical method we will use is interrupted time series. Outcomes will be measured on individual births nested within mothers, with mothers themselves clustered within data zones. Multilevel regression models will be used to determine whether the outcomes changed during the period in which the HiP grants was in effect. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for those groups most likely to benefit from the payments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for data collection, storage and release for research purpose has been given (6 May 2014, PAC38A/13) by the Privacy Advisory Committee. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in journals, national and international conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4202003/ /pubmed/25324327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006547 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Policy
Dundas, Ruth
Ouédraogo, Samiratou
Bond, Lyndal
Briggs, Andrew H
Chalmers, James
Gray, Ron
Wood, Rachael
Leyland, Alastair H
Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
title Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
title_full Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
title_fullStr Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
title_short Evaluation of Health in Pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
title_sort evaluation of health in pregnancy grants in scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25324327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006547
work_keys_str_mv AT dundasruth evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT ouedraogosamiratou evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT bondlyndal evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT briggsandrewh evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT chalmersjames evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT grayron evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT woodrachael evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment
AT leylandalastairh evaluationofhealthinpregnancygrantsinscotlandaprotocolforanaturalexperiment