Cargando…

Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images

We investigated the effect of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer under different planning target volume (PTV) margin settings using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. A total of 30 consecutive patients wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirose, Yoshinori, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Tomita, Tsuneyuki, Kitsuda, Kenji, Notogawa, Takuya, Miki, Katsuhito, Nakamura, Kiyonao, Ishigaki, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24820094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru033
_version_ 1782340290301919232
author Hirose, Yoshinori
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Tomita, Tsuneyuki
Kitsuda, Kenji
Notogawa, Takuya
Miki, Katsuhito
Nakamura, Kiyonao
Ishigaki, Takashi
author_facet Hirose, Yoshinori
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Tomita, Tsuneyuki
Kitsuda, Kenji
Notogawa, Takuya
Miki, Katsuhito
Nakamura, Kiyonao
Ishigaki, Takashi
author_sort Hirose, Yoshinori
collection PubMed
description We investigated the effect of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer under different planning target volume (PTV) margin settings using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent IMRT for prostate cancer were retrospectively analysed, and 7–14 CBCT datasets were acquired per patient. Interfractional variations in dose–volume metrics were evaluated under six different set-up error corrections, including tattoo, bony anatomy, and four different target matching groups. Set-up errors were incorporated into planning the isocenter position, and dose distributions were recalculated on CBCT images. These processes were repeated under two different PTV margin settings. In the on-line bony anatomy matching groups, systematic error (∑) was 0.3 mm, 1.4 mm, and 0.3 mm in the left–right, anterior–posterior (AP), and superior–inferior directions, respectively. ∑ in three successive off-line target matchings was finally comparable with that in the on-line bony anatomy matching in the AP direction. Although doses to the rectum and bladder wall were reduced for a small PTV margin, averaged reductions in the volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose from planning were within 2.5% under all PTV margin settings for all correction groups, with the exception of the tattoo set-up error correction only (≥5.0%). Analysis of variance showed no significant difference between on-line bony anatomy matching and target matching. While variations between the planned and delivered doses were smallest when target matching was applied, the use of bony anatomy matching still ensured the planned doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4202291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42022912014-10-23 Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images Hirose, Yoshinori Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Tomita, Tsuneyuki Kitsuda, Kenji Notogawa, Takuya Miki, Katsuhito Nakamura, Kiyonao Ishigaki, Takashi J Radiat Res Oncology We investigated the effect of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer under different planning target volume (PTV) margin settings using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent IMRT for prostate cancer were retrospectively analysed, and 7–14 CBCT datasets were acquired per patient. Interfractional variations in dose–volume metrics were evaluated under six different set-up error corrections, including tattoo, bony anatomy, and four different target matching groups. Set-up errors were incorporated into planning the isocenter position, and dose distributions were recalculated on CBCT images. These processes were repeated under two different PTV margin settings. In the on-line bony anatomy matching groups, systematic error (∑) was 0.3 mm, 1.4 mm, and 0.3 mm in the left–right, anterior–posterior (AP), and superior–inferior directions, respectively. ∑ in three successive off-line target matchings was finally comparable with that in the on-line bony anatomy matching in the AP direction. Although doses to the rectum and bladder wall were reduced for a small PTV margin, averaged reductions in the volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose from planning were within 2.5% under all PTV margin settings for all correction groups, with the exception of the tattoo set-up error correction only (≥5.0%). Analysis of variance showed no significant difference between on-line bony anatomy matching and target matching. While variations between the planned and delivered doses were smallest when target matching was applied, the use of bony anatomy matching still ensured the planned doses. Oxford University Press 2014-09 2014-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4202291/ /pubmed/24820094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru033 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hirose, Yoshinori
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Tomita, Tsuneyuki
Kitsuda, Kenji
Notogawa, Takuya
Miki, Katsuhito
Nakamura, Kiyonao
Ishigaki, Takashi
Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images
title Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images
title_full Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images
title_fullStr Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images
title_short Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images
title_sort evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose–volume metrics in prostate imrt using cbct images
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24820094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru033
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroseyoshinori evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT nakamuramitsuhiro evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT tomitatsuneyuki evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT kitsudakenji evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT notogawatakuya evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT mikikatsuhito evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT nakamurakiyonao evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages
AT ishigakitakashi evaluationofdifferentsetuperrorcorrectionsondosevolumemetricsinprostateimrtusingcbctimages