Cargando…

Language choice in bimodal bilingual development

Bilingual children develop sensitivity to the language used by their interlocutors at an early age, reflected in differential use of each language by the child depending on their interlocutor. Factors such as discourse context and relative language dominance in the community may mediate the degree o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lillo-Martin, Diane, de Quadros, Ronice M., Chen Pichler, Deborah, Fieldsteel, Zoe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01163
_version_ 1782340337080991744
author Lillo-Martin, Diane
de Quadros, Ronice M.
Chen Pichler, Deborah
Fieldsteel, Zoe
author_facet Lillo-Martin, Diane
de Quadros, Ronice M.
Chen Pichler, Deborah
Fieldsteel, Zoe
author_sort Lillo-Martin, Diane
collection PubMed
description Bilingual children develop sensitivity to the language used by their interlocutors at an early age, reflected in differential use of each language by the child depending on their interlocutor. Factors such as discourse context and relative language dominance in the community may mediate the degree of language differentiation in preschool age children. Bimodal bilingual children, acquiring both a sign language and a spoken language, have an even more complex situation. Their Deaf parents vary considerably in access to the spoken language. Furthermore, in addition to code-mixing and code-switching, they use code-blending—expressions in both speech and sign simultaneously—an option uniquely available to bimodal bilinguals. Code-blending is analogous to code-switching sociolinguistically, but is also a way to communicate without suppressing one language. For adult bimodal bilinguals, complete suppression of the non-selected language is cognitively demanding. We expect that bimodal bilingual children also find suppression difficult, and use blending rather than suppression in some contexts. We also expect relative community language dominance to be a factor in children's language choices. This study analyzes longitudinal spontaneous production data from four bimodal bilingual children and their Deaf and hearing interlocutors. Even at the earliest observations, the children produced more signed utterances with Deaf interlocutors and more speech with hearing interlocutors. However, while three of the four children produced >75% speech alone in speech target sessions, they produced <25% sign alone in sign target sessions. All four produced bimodal utterances in both, but more frequently in the sign sessions, potentially because they find suppression of the dominant language more difficult. Our results indicate that these children are sensitive to the language used by their interlocutors, while showing considerable influence from the dominant community language.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4202712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42027122014-11-03 Language choice in bimodal bilingual development Lillo-Martin, Diane de Quadros, Ronice M. Chen Pichler, Deborah Fieldsteel, Zoe Front Psychol Psychology Bilingual children develop sensitivity to the language used by their interlocutors at an early age, reflected in differential use of each language by the child depending on their interlocutor. Factors such as discourse context and relative language dominance in the community may mediate the degree of language differentiation in preschool age children. Bimodal bilingual children, acquiring both a sign language and a spoken language, have an even more complex situation. Their Deaf parents vary considerably in access to the spoken language. Furthermore, in addition to code-mixing and code-switching, they use code-blending—expressions in both speech and sign simultaneously—an option uniquely available to bimodal bilinguals. Code-blending is analogous to code-switching sociolinguistically, but is also a way to communicate without suppressing one language. For adult bimodal bilinguals, complete suppression of the non-selected language is cognitively demanding. We expect that bimodal bilingual children also find suppression difficult, and use blending rather than suppression in some contexts. We also expect relative community language dominance to be a factor in children's language choices. This study analyzes longitudinal spontaneous production data from four bimodal bilingual children and their Deaf and hearing interlocutors. Even at the earliest observations, the children produced more signed utterances with Deaf interlocutors and more speech with hearing interlocutors. However, while three of the four children produced >75% speech alone in speech target sessions, they produced <25% sign alone in sign target sessions. All four produced bimodal utterances in both, but more frequently in the sign sessions, potentially because they find suppression of the dominant language more difficult. Our results indicate that these children are sensitive to the language used by their interlocutors, while showing considerable influence from the dominant community language. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4202712/ /pubmed/25368591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01163 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lillo-Martin, de Quadros, Chen Pichler and Fieldsteel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lillo-Martin, Diane
de Quadros, Ronice M.
Chen Pichler, Deborah
Fieldsteel, Zoe
Language choice in bimodal bilingual development
title Language choice in bimodal bilingual development
title_full Language choice in bimodal bilingual development
title_fullStr Language choice in bimodal bilingual development
title_full_unstemmed Language choice in bimodal bilingual development
title_short Language choice in bimodal bilingual development
title_sort language choice in bimodal bilingual development
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01163
work_keys_str_mv AT lillomartindiane languagechoiceinbimodalbilingualdevelopment
AT dequadrosronicem languagechoiceinbimodalbilingualdevelopment
AT chenpichlerdeborah languagechoiceinbimodalbilingualdevelopment
AT fieldsteelzoe languagechoiceinbimodalbilingualdevelopment