Cargando…

The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic breast augmentation (breast implants) is one of the most common plastic surgery procedures worldwide and uptake in high income countries has increased in the last two decades. Women need information about all associated outcomes in order to make an informed decision regarding wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiff, Michal, Algert, Charles S, Ampt, Amanda, Sywak, Mark S, Roberts, Christine L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4203468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-17
_version_ 1782340399366406144
author Schiff, Michal
Algert, Charles S
Ampt, Amanda
Sywak, Mark S
Roberts, Christine L
author_facet Schiff, Michal
Algert, Charles S
Ampt, Amanda
Sywak, Mark S
Roberts, Christine L
author_sort Schiff, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cosmetic breast augmentation (breast implants) is one of the most common plastic surgery procedures worldwide and uptake in high income countries has increased in the last two decades. Women need information about all associated outcomes in order to make an informed decision regarding whether to undergo cosmetic breast surgery. We conducted a systematic review to assess breastfeeding outcomes among women with breast implants compared to women without. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted using the earliest inclusive dates through December 2013. Eligible studies included comparative studies that reported breastfeeding outcomes (any breastfeeding, and among women who breastfed, exclusive breastfeeding) for women with and without breast implants. Pairs of reviewers extracted descriptive data, study quality, and outcomes. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled across studies using the random-effects model. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to critically appraise study quality, and the National Health and Medical Research Council Level of Evidence Scale to rank the level of the evidence. This systematic review has been registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42014009074. RESULTS: Three small, observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was fair (NOS 4-6) and the level of evidence was low (III-2 - III-3). There was no significant difference in attempted breastfeeding (one study, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76, 1.17). However, among women who breastfed, all three studies reported a reduced likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding amongst women with breast implants with a pooled rate ratio of 0.60 (95% CI 0.40, 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that women with breast implants who breastfeed were less likely to exclusively feed their infants with breast milk compared to women without breast implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4203468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42034682014-10-21 The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis Schiff, Michal Algert, Charles S Ampt, Amanda Sywak, Mark S Roberts, Christine L Int Breastfeed J Research BACKGROUND: Cosmetic breast augmentation (breast implants) is one of the most common plastic surgery procedures worldwide and uptake in high income countries has increased in the last two decades. Women need information about all associated outcomes in order to make an informed decision regarding whether to undergo cosmetic breast surgery. We conducted a systematic review to assess breastfeeding outcomes among women with breast implants compared to women without. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted using the earliest inclusive dates through December 2013. Eligible studies included comparative studies that reported breastfeeding outcomes (any breastfeeding, and among women who breastfed, exclusive breastfeeding) for women with and without breast implants. Pairs of reviewers extracted descriptive data, study quality, and outcomes. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled across studies using the random-effects model. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to critically appraise study quality, and the National Health and Medical Research Council Level of Evidence Scale to rank the level of the evidence. This systematic review has been registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42014009074. RESULTS: Three small, observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was fair (NOS 4-6) and the level of evidence was low (III-2 - III-3). There was no significant difference in attempted breastfeeding (one study, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76, 1.17). However, among women who breastfed, all three studies reported a reduced likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding amongst women with breast implants with a pooled rate ratio of 0.60 (95% CI 0.40, 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that women with breast implants who breastfeed were less likely to exclusively feed their infants with breast milk compared to women without breast implants. BioMed Central 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4203468/ /pubmed/25332722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schiff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schiff, Michal
Algert, Charles S
Ampt, Amanda
Sywak, Mark S
Roberts, Christine L
The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort impact of cosmetic breast implants on breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4203468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-17
work_keys_str_mv AT schiffmichal theimpactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT algertcharless theimpactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amptamanda theimpactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sywakmarks theimpactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertschristinel theimpactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schiffmichal impactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT algertcharless impactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amptamanda impactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sywakmarks impactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertschristinel impactofcosmeticbreastimplantsonbreastfeedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis