Cargando…

Hyperspectral Detection of a Subsurface CO(2) Leak in the Presence of Water Stressed Vegetation

Remote sensing of vegetation stress has been posed as a possible large area monitoring tool for surface CO(2) leakage from geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) sites since vegetation is adversely affected by elevated CO(2) levels in soil. However, the extent to which remote sensing could be used for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellante, Gabriel J., Powell, Scott L., Lawrence, Rick L., Repasky, Kevin S., Dougher, Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4203680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25330232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108299
Descripción
Sumario:Remote sensing of vegetation stress has been posed as a possible large area monitoring tool for surface CO(2) leakage from geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) sites since vegetation is adversely affected by elevated CO(2) levels in soil. However, the extent to which remote sensing could be used for CO(2) leak detection depends on the spectral separability of the plant stress signal caused by various factors, including elevated soil CO(2) and water stress. This distinction is crucial to determining the seasonality and appropriateness of remote GCS site monitoring. A greenhouse experiment tested the degree to which plants stressed by elevated soil CO(2) could be distinguished from plants that were water stressed. A randomized block design assigned Alfalfa plants (Medicago sativa) to one of four possible treatment groups: 1) a CO(2) injection group; 2) a water stress group; 3) an interaction group that was subjected to both water stress and CO(2) injection; or 4) a group that received adequate water and no CO(2) injection. Single date classification trees were developed to identify individual spectral bands that were significant in distinguishing between CO(2) and water stress agents, in addition to a random forest classifier that was used to further understand and validate predictive accuracies. Overall peak classification accuracy was 90% (Kappa of 0.87) for the classification tree analysis and 83% (Kappa of 0.77) for the random forest classifier, demonstrating that vegetation stressed from an underground CO(2) leak could be accurately discerned from healthy vegetation and areas of co-occurring water stressed vegetation at certain times. Plants appear to hit a stress threshold, however, that would render detection of a CO(2) leak unlikely during severe drought conditions. Our findings suggest that early detection of a CO(2) leak with an aerial or ground-based hyperspectral imaging system is possible and could be an important GCS monitoring tool.