Cargando…

Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density, the white radiolucent part of a mammogram, is a marker of breast cancer risk and mammographic sensitivity. There are several means of measuring mammographic density, among which are area-based and volumetric-based approaches. Current volumetric methods use only un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheddad, Abbas, Czene, Kamila, Eriksson, Mikael, Li, Jingmei, Easton, Douglas, Hall, Per, Humphreys, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4203856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110690
_version_ 1782340448808861696
author Cheddad, Abbas
Czene, Kamila
Eriksson, Mikael
Li, Jingmei
Easton, Douglas
Hall, Per
Humphreys, Keith
author_facet Cheddad, Abbas
Czene, Kamila
Eriksson, Mikael
Li, Jingmei
Easton, Douglas
Hall, Per
Humphreys, Keith
author_sort Cheddad, Abbas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density, the white radiolucent part of a mammogram, is a marker of breast cancer risk and mammographic sensitivity. There are several means of measuring mammographic density, among which are area-based and volumetric-based approaches. Current volumetric methods use only unprocessed, raw mammograms, which is a problematic restriction since such raw mammograms are normally not stored. We describe fully automated methods for measuring both area and volumetric mammographic density from processed images. METHODS: The data set used in this study comprises raw and processed images of the same view from 1462 women. We developed two algorithms for processed images, an automated area-based approach (CASAM-Area) and a volumetric-based approach (CASAM-Vol). The latter method was based on training a random forest prediction model with image statistical features as predictors, against a volumetric measure, Volpara, for corresponding raw images. We contrast the three methods, CASAM-Area, CASAM-Vol and Volpara directly and in terms of association with breast cancer risk and a known genetic variant for mammographic density and breast cancer, rs10995190 in the gene ZNF365. Associations with breast cancer risk were evaluated using images from 47 breast cancer cases and 1011 control subjects. The genetic association analysis was based on 1011 control subjects. RESULTS: All three measures of mammographic density were associated with breast cancer risk and rs10995190 (p<0.025 for breast cancer risk and p<1×10(−6) for rs10995190). After adjusting for one of the measures there remained little or no evidence of residual association with the remaining density measures (p>0.10 for risk, p>0.03 for rs10995190). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that it is possible to obtain reliable automated measures of volumetric and area mammographic density from processed digital images. Area and volumetric measures of density on processed digital images performed similar in terms of risk and genetic association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4203856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42038562014-10-27 Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer Cheddad, Abbas Czene, Kamila Eriksson, Mikael Li, Jingmei Easton, Douglas Hall, Per Humphreys, Keith PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density, the white radiolucent part of a mammogram, is a marker of breast cancer risk and mammographic sensitivity. There are several means of measuring mammographic density, among which are area-based and volumetric-based approaches. Current volumetric methods use only unprocessed, raw mammograms, which is a problematic restriction since such raw mammograms are normally not stored. We describe fully automated methods for measuring both area and volumetric mammographic density from processed images. METHODS: The data set used in this study comprises raw and processed images of the same view from 1462 women. We developed two algorithms for processed images, an automated area-based approach (CASAM-Area) and a volumetric-based approach (CASAM-Vol). The latter method was based on training a random forest prediction model with image statistical features as predictors, against a volumetric measure, Volpara, for corresponding raw images. We contrast the three methods, CASAM-Area, CASAM-Vol and Volpara directly and in terms of association with breast cancer risk and a known genetic variant for mammographic density and breast cancer, rs10995190 in the gene ZNF365. Associations with breast cancer risk were evaluated using images from 47 breast cancer cases and 1011 control subjects. The genetic association analysis was based on 1011 control subjects. RESULTS: All three measures of mammographic density were associated with breast cancer risk and rs10995190 (p<0.025 for breast cancer risk and p<1×10(−6) for rs10995190). After adjusting for one of the measures there remained little or no evidence of residual association with the remaining density measures (p>0.10 for risk, p>0.03 for rs10995190). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that it is possible to obtain reliable automated measures of volumetric and area mammographic density from processed digital images. Area and volumetric measures of density on processed digital images performed similar in terms of risk and genetic association. Public Library of Science 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4203856/ /pubmed/25329322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110690 Text en © 2014 Cheddad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheddad, Abbas
Czene, Kamila
Eriksson, Mikael
Li, Jingmei
Easton, Douglas
Hall, Per
Humphreys, Keith
Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
title Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
title_full Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
title_short Area and Volumetric Density Estimation in Processed Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
title_sort area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4203856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25329322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110690
work_keys_str_mv AT cheddadabbas areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer
AT czenekamila areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer
AT erikssonmikael areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer
AT lijingmei areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer
AT eastondouglas areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer
AT hallper areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer
AT humphreyskeith areaandvolumetricdensityestimationinprocessedfullfielddigitalmammogramsforriskassessmentofbreastcancer