Cargando…

Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on frequency of fecal evacuation disorder (FED) among patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), hitherto an enigmatic condition, are scanty. Moreover, most such studies had limitations due to small sample size and lack of inclusion of healthy controls (HC). METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Atul, Misra, Asha, Ghoshal, Uday C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm14030
_version_ 1782340561381883904
author Sharma, Atul
Misra, Asha
Ghoshal, Uday C
author_facet Sharma, Atul
Misra, Asha
Ghoshal, Uday C
author_sort Sharma, Atul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on frequency of fecal evacuation disorder (FED) among patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), hitherto an enigmatic condition, are scanty. Moreover, most such studies had limitations due to small sample size and lack of inclusion of healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Forty patients with SRUS underwent symptom assessments, sigmoidoscopy, anorectal manometry, defecography, balloon expulsion test (BET); endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) of anal sphincter complex was performed in a subgroup. Physiological tests (anorectal manometry and BET) were also performed in 19 HC. RESULTS: Patients with SRUS (26/40 male, age 37 [18–80] years) more often had FED than HC (10/19 male, age 43 [25–72] years) as shown by weight needed to expel the balloon (300 [0–700] g vs. 100 [0–400] g; P = 0.006), a trend towards abnormal BET (need of > 200 g weight for expulsion) (21/40 [53%] vs. 5/19 [26%], P = 0.058) and impaired anal relaxation (14/40 [35%] vs 2/19 [10.5%]; P = 0.048). Using Rome III criteria, most patients with SRUS reported having chronic constipation (36/40 [90%]) in spite of having normal (Bristol stool type IV, 21/40 [53%]) and diarrheal (types V, VI, VII, 6/40 [20%]) stool forms (Asian classification). SRUS patients more often (17/40 [43%]) had functional defecation disorder (Rome III criteria). Patients with SRUS with abnormal BET had thicker internal anal sphincter than those without (3.9 [3.4–7.0] mm vs 2.8 [2.0–4.0] mm; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: FED was commoner among patients with SRUS as evidenced by abnormal BET and sphincter relaxation. Those with abnormal BET had thicker internal sphincter on EUS than those without.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4204410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42044102014-10-22 Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study Sharma, Atul Misra, Asha Ghoshal, Uday C J Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on frequency of fecal evacuation disorder (FED) among patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), hitherto an enigmatic condition, are scanty. Moreover, most such studies had limitations due to small sample size and lack of inclusion of healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Forty patients with SRUS underwent symptom assessments, sigmoidoscopy, anorectal manometry, defecography, balloon expulsion test (BET); endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) of anal sphincter complex was performed in a subgroup. Physiological tests (anorectal manometry and BET) were also performed in 19 HC. RESULTS: Patients with SRUS (26/40 male, age 37 [18–80] years) more often had FED than HC (10/19 male, age 43 [25–72] years) as shown by weight needed to expel the balloon (300 [0–700] g vs. 100 [0–400] g; P = 0.006), a trend towards abnormal BET (need of > 200 g weight for expulsion) (21/40 [53%] vs. 5/19 [26%], P = 0.058) and impaired anal relaxation (14/40 [35%] vs 2/19 [10.5%]; P = 0.048). Using Rome III criteria, most patients with SRUS reported having chronic constipation (36/40 [90%]) in spite of having normal (Bristol stool type IV, 21/40 [53%]) and diarrheal (types V, VI, VII, 6/40 [20%]) stool forms (Asian classification). SRUS patients more often (17/40 [43%]) had functional defecation disorder (Rome III criteria). Patients with SRUS with abnormal BET had thicker internal anal sphincter than those without (3.9 [3.4–7.0] mm vs 2.8 [2.0–4.0] mm; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: FED was commoner among patients with SRUS as evidenced by abnormal BET and sphincter relaxation. Those with abnormal BET had thicker internal sphincter on EUS than those without. Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4204410/ /pubmed/25273123 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm14030 Text en © 2014 The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Atul
Misra, Asha
Ghoshal, Uday C
Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study
title Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study
title_full Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study
title_fullStr Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study
title_full_unstemmed Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study
title_short Fecal Evacuation Disorder Among Patients With Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-control Study
title_sort fecal evacuation disorder among patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a case-control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm14030
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaatul fecalevacuationdisorderamongpatientswithsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT misraasha fecalevacuationdisorderamongpatientswithsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT ghoshaludayc fecalevacuationdisorderamongpatientswithsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeacasecontrolstudy