Cargando…

A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies

Extraneous DNA interferes with PCR studies of endophytic fungi. A procedure was developed with which to evaluate the removal of extraneous DNA. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves were sprayed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and then subjected to physical and chemical surface treatments. The fungal ITS1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgdorf, R.J., Laing, M.D., Morris, C.D., Jamal-Ally, S.F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25477934
_version_ 1782340639305760768
author Burgdorf, R.J.
Laing, M.D.
Morris, C.D.
Jamal-Ally, S.F.
author_facet Burgdorf, R.J.
Laing, M.D.
Morris, C.D.
Jamal-Ally, S.F.
author_sort Burgdorf, R.J.
collection PubMed
description Extraneous DNA interferes with PCR studies of endophytic fungi. A procedure was developed with which to evaluate the removal of extraneous DNA. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves were sprayed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and then subjected to physical and chemical surface treatments. The fungal ITS1 products were amplified from whole tissue DNA extractions. ANOVA was performed on the DNA bands representing S. cerevisiae on the agarose gel. Band profile comparisons using permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were performed on DGGE gel data, and band numbers were compared between treatments. Leaf surfaces were viewed under variable pressure scanning electron microscopy (VPSEM). Yeast band analysis of the agarose gel showed that there was no significant difference in the mean band DNA quantity after physical and chemical treatments, but they both differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the untreated control. PERMANOVA revealed a significant difference between all treatments (p < 0.05). The mean similarity matrix showed that the physical treatment results were more reproducible than those from the chemical treatment results. The NMDS showed that the physical treatment was the most consistent. VPSEM indicated that the physical treatment was the most effective treatment to remove surface microbes and debris. The use of molecular and microscopy methods for the post-treatment detection of yeast inoculated onto wheat leaf surfaces demonstrated the effectiveness of the surface treatment employed, and this can assist researchers in optimizing their surface sterilization techniques in DNA-based fungal endophyte studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4204985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42049852014-12-04 A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies Burgdorf, R.J. Laing, M.D. Morris, C.D. Jamal-Ally, S.F. Braz J Microbiol Research Paper Extraneous DNA interferes with PCR studies of endophytic fungi. A procedure was developed with which to evaluate the removal of extraneous DNA. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves were sprayed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and then subjected to physical and chemical surface treatments. The fungal ITS1 products were amplified from whole tissue DNA extractions. ANOVA was performed on the DNA bands representing S. cerevisiae on the agarose gel. Band profile comparisons using permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were performed on DGGE gel data, and band numbers were compared between treatments. Leaf surfaces were viewed under variable pressure scanning electron microscopy (VPSEM). Yeast band analysis of the agarose gel showed that there was no significant difference in the mean band DNA quantity after physical and chemical treatments, but they both differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the untreated control. PERMANOVA revealed a significant difference between all treatments (p < 0.05). The mean similarity matrix showed that the physical treatment results were more reproducible than those from the chemical treatment results. The NMDS showed that the physical treatment was the most consistent. VPSEM indicated that the physical treatment was the most effective treatment to remove surface microbes and debris. The use of molecular and microscopy methods for the post-treatment detection of yeast inoculated onto wheat leaf surfaces demonstrated the effectiveness of the surface treatment employed, and this can assist researchers in optimizing their surface sterilization techniques in DNA-based fungal endophyte studies. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2014-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4204985/ /pubmed/25477934 Text en Copyright © 2014, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Burgdorf, R.J.
Laing, M.D.
Morris, C.D.
Jamal-Ally, S.F.
A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
title A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
title_full A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
title_fullStr A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
title_full_unstemmed A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
title_short A procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
title_sort procedure to evaluate the efficiency of surface sterilization methods in culture-independent fungal endophyte studies
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25477934
work_keys_str_mv AT burgdorfrj aproceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT laingmd aproceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT morriscd aproceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT jamalallysf aproceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT burgdorfrj proceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT laingmd proceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT morriscd proceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies
AT jamalallysf proceduretoevaluatetheefficiencyofsurfacesterilizationmethodsincultureindependentfungalendophytestudies