Cargando…
Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly used to improve quality of care. There is evidence for moderate to large effects from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but evidence on their effectiveness when implemented at a national level is lacking. In the Netherland...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0145-5 |
_version_ | 1782340672399867904 |
---|---|
author | Lugtenberg, Marjolein Westert, Gert P Pasveer, Dennis van der Weijden, Trudy Kool, Rudolf B |
author_facet | Lugtenberg, Marjolein Westert, Gert P Pasveer, Dennis van der Weijden, Trudy Kool, Rudolf B |
author_sort | Lugtenberg, Marjolein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly used to improve quality of care. There is evidence for moderate to large effects from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but evidence on their effectiveness when implemented at a national level is lacking. In the Netherlands, the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) initiated their successful guideline program already 30 years ago. NHGDoc, a CDSS based on these NHG guidelines, covering multiple disease areas for general practice, was developed in 2006 with the aim to improve quality of primary care. In this paper, a protocol is presented to evaluate the uptake and effects of NHGDoc. METHODS: A cluster RCT will be conducted among 120 general practices in the Netherlands. Eligible general practices will be randomized to receive either the regular NHGDoc decision support modules (control arm) or the regular modules plus an additional module on heart failure (intervention arm). The heart failure module consists of patient-specific alerts concerning the treatment of patients with heart failure. The effect evaluation will focus on performance indicators (e.g., prescription behavior) as well as on patient outcomes (e.g., hospital admissions) relevant in the domain of heart failure. Additionally, a process evaluation will be conducted to gain insight into the barriers and facilitators that affect the uptake and impact of NHGDoc. DISCUSSION: Results of this study will provide insight in the uptake and impact of a multiple-domain covering CDSS for primary care implemented by a national guideline organization to improve the quality of primary care. Whereas the trial focuses on a specific domain of care—heart failure—conclusions of this study will shed light on the functioning of CDSSs covering multiple disease areas for primary care, particularly as this study also explores the factors contributing to the system’s uptake and effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT01773057 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0145-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4205280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42052802014-10-23 Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial Lugtenberg, Marjolein Westert, Gert P Pasveer, Dennis van der Weijden, Trudy Kool, Rudolf B Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly used to improve quality of care. There is evidence for moderate to large effects from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but evidence on their effectiveness when implemented at a national level is lacking. In the Netherlands, the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) initiated their successful guideline program already 30 years ago. NHGDoc, a CDSS based on these NHG guidelines, covering multiple disease areas for general practice, was developed in 2006 with the aim to improve quality of primary care. In this paper, a protocol is presented to evaluate the uptake and effects of NHGDoc. METHODS: A cluster RCT will be conducted among 120 general practices in the Netherlands. Eligible general practices will be randomized to receive either the regular NHGDoc decision support modules (control arm) or the regular modules plus an additional module on heart failure (intervention arm). The heart failure module consists of patient-specific alerts concerning the treatment of patients with heart failure. The effect evaluation will focus on performance indicators (e.g., prescription behavior) as well as on patient outcomes (e.g., hospital admissions) relevant in the domain of heart failure. Additionally, a process evaluation will be conducted to gain insight into the barriers and facilitators that affect the uptake and impact of NHGDoc. DISCUSSION: Results of this study will provide insight in the uptake and impact of a multiple-domain covering CDSS for primary care implemented by a national guideline organization to improve the quality of primary care. Whereas the trial focuses on a specific domain of care—heart failure—conclusions of this study will shed light on the functioning of CDSSs covering multiple disease areas for primary care, particularly as this study also explores the factors contributing to the system’s uptake and effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT01773057 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0145-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4205280/ /pubmed/25322766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0145-5 Text en © Lugtenberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lugtenberg, Marjolein Westert, Gert P Pasveer, Dennis van der Weijden, Trudy Kool, Rudolf B Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
title | Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system nhgdoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0145-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lugtenbergmarjolein evaluatingtheuptakeandeffectsofthecomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemnhgdoconqualityofprimarycareprotocolforalargescaleclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT westertgertp evaluatingtheuptakeandeffectsofthecomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemnhgdoconqualityofprimarycareprotocolforalargescaleclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pasveerdennis evaluatingtheuptakeandeffectsofthecomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemnhgdoconqualityofprimarycareprotocolforalargescaleclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderweijdentrudy evaluatingtheuptakeandeffectsofthecomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemnhgdoconqualityofprimarycareprotocolforalargescaleclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koolrudolfb evaluatingtheuptakeandeffectsofthecomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemnhgdoconqualityofprimarycareprotocolforalargescaleclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |