Student evaluation of the academic advising process in an Iranian medical school

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine student evaluation of the academic advising process in an Iranian medical school. METHOD: We conducted a cross sectional survey of all fourth and fifth year students who studied medicine, nursing and laboratory technology. A short version of a validated questionnaire was administrated to 85 students (23 males and 62 females) at Fasa Medical School, Iran. RESULTS: Of the students, 48(56%) were satisfied with the academic advising process. The descriptive analysis of the study showed that many students (n=72) valued the importance of feedback on student ability in the academic advising process. A further descriptive analysis showed that 34 students (40%) were satisfied that advisers were aware of their records. There was a significant difference between student’s main course (χ(2) ((2)) = 8.9; p= 0.012) and satisfaction with academic advising. However, the observed differences between female and male students in this study were not statistically significant (χ(2) ((1)) = 2.2; p= 0.107). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal a lack of systematic planning, skills and resources for the academic advising process at the Fars Medical School. The results indicate the need for academic staff development initiatives to improve the academic advising process. An ongoing evaluation program of the academic needs of students may help to advisors to provide academic advising and academic support for students in various courses.