Cargando…

Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study

Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leffel, Timothy, Lauter, Miriam, Westerlund, Masha, Pylkkänen, Liina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.956765
_version_ 1782340741040701440
author Leffel, Timothy
Lauter, Miriam
Westerlund, Masha
Pylkkänen, Liina
author_facet Leffel, Timothy
Lauter, Miriam
Westerlund, Masha
Pylkkänen, Liina
author_sort Leffel, Timothy
collection PubMed
description Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4205928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42059282014-11-04 Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study Leffel, Timothy Lauter, Miriam Westerlund, Masha Pylkkänen, Liina Lang Cogn Neurosci Original Articles Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors. Routledge 2014-11-26 2014-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4205928/ /pubmed/25379512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.956765 Text en © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Leffel, Timothy
Lauter, Miriam
Westerlund, Masha
Pylkkänen, Liina
Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
title Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
title_full Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
title_fullStr Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
title_full_unstemmed Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
title_short Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
title_sort restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.956765
work_keys_str_mv AT leffeltimothy restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT lautermiriam restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT westerlundmasha restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT pylkkanenliina restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy