Cargando…
Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study
Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LA...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.956765 |
_version_ | 1782340741040701440 |
---|---|
author | Leffel, Timothy Lauter, Miriam Westerlund, Masha Pylkkänen, Liina |
author_facet | Leffel, Timothy Lauter, Miriam Westerlund, Masha Pylkkänen, Liina |
author_sort | Leffel, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4205928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42059282014-11-04 Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study Leffel, Timothy Lauter, Miriam Westerlund, Masha Pylkkänen, Liina Lang Cogn Neurosci Original Articles Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors. Routledge 2014-11-26 2014-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4205928/ /pubmed/25379512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.956765 Text en © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Leffel, Timothy Lauter, Miriam Westerlund, Masha Pylkkänen, Liina Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
title | Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
title_full | Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
title_fullStr | Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
title_full_unstemmed | Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
title_short | Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
title_sort | restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: a magnetoencephalography study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.956765 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leffeltimothy restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy AT lautermiriam restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy AT westerlundmasha restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy AT pylkkanenliina restrictivevsnonrestrictivecompositionamagnetoencephalographystudy |