Cargando…

Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of chewing impairment according to sex, and its associated factors in adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out with 2,016 subjects aged between 20 and 59 years in Florianopolis, SC, Southern Brazil, in 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueiredo, Daniela de Rossi, Peres, Marco Aurélio, Luchi, Carla Antoni, Peres, Karen Glazer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004789
_version_ 1782340772411998208
author Figueiredo, Daniela de Rossi
Peres, Marco Aurélio
Luchi, Carla Antoni
Peres, Karen Glazer
author_facet Figueiredo, Daniela de Rossi
Peres, Marco Aurélio
Luchi, Carla Antoni
Peres, Karen Glazer
author_sort Figueiredo, Daniela de Rossi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of chewing impairment according to sex, and its associated factors in adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out with 2,016 subjects aged between 20 and 59 years in Florianopolis, SC, Southern Brazil, in 2009. The sampling was undertaken in two stages, census tracts and households. The outcome 'chewing impairment' was obtained from the question "How often do you have chewing impairment due to teeth or denture problems?". Analyses were carried out with demographics and socioeconomic factors, dental services utilization, and self-related oral health using multivariable logistic regression and stratified by sex. RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3% (1,720 adults). The prevalence of chewing impairment was 13,0% (95%CI 10.3;15.8) and 18,0% (95%CI 14.6;21.3) among men and women, respectively. Women and men fifty years old and over, who had ten or fewer natural teeth and those who reported toothache were more likely to have chewing impairment. The combination of tooth loss and toothache on chewing impairment was almost four times higher among women. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the associations among socioeconomic, demographics and self-related oral health factors was different according to sex, in general higher for women, with emphasis on toothache. The findings suggest that the impact of oral conditions varies by sex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4206107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42061072015-01-07 Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults Figueiredo, Daniela de Rossi Peres, Marco Aurélio Luchi, Carla Antoni Peres, Karen Glazer Rev Saude Publica Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of chewing impairment according to sex, and its associated factors in adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out with 2,016 subjects aged between 20 and 59 years in Florianopolis, SC, Southern Brazil, in 2009. The sampling was undertaken in two stages, census tracts and households. The outcome 'chewing impairment' was obtained from the question "How often do you have chewing impairment due to teeth or denture problems?". Analyses were carried out with demographics and socioeconomic factors, dental services utilization, and self-related oral health using multivariable logistic regression and stratified by sex. RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3% (1,720 adults). The prevalence of chewing impairment was 13,0% (95%CI 10.3;15.8) and 18,0% (95%CI 14.6;21.3) among men and women, respectively. Women and men fifty years old and over, who had ten or fewer natural teeth and those who reported toothache were more likely to have chewing impairment. The combination of tooth loss and toothache on chewing impairment was almost four times higher among women. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the associations among socioeconomic, demographics and self-related oral health factors was different according to sex, in general higher for women, with emphasis on toothache. The findings suggest that the impact of oral conditions varies by sex. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4206107/ /pubmed/24626541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004789 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Figueiredo, Daniela de Rossi
Peres, Marco Aurélio
Luchi, Carla Antoni
Peres, Karen Glazer
Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
title Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
title_full Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
title_fullStr Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
title_full_unstemmed Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
title_short Chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
title_sort chewing impairment and associated factors among adults
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004789
work_keys_str_mv AT figueiredodanieladerossi chewingimpairmentandassociatedfactorsamongadults
AT peresmarcoaurelio chewingimpairmentandassociatedfactorsamongadults
AT luchicarlaantoni chewingimpairmentandassociatedfactorsamongadults
AT pereskarenglazer chewingimpairmentandassociatedfactorsamongadults