Cargando…

An Equation for the Prediction of Oxygen Consumption in a Brazilian Population

BACKGROUND: The equations predicting maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max or peak)) presently in use in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) softwares in Brazil have not been adequately validated. These equations are very important for the diagnostic capacity of this method. OBJECTIVE: Build and valida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Almeida, Antonio Eduardo Monteiro, Stefani, Charles de Moraes, do Nascimento, João Agnaldo, de Almeida, Narla Miranda, Santos, Amilton da Cruz, Ribeiro, Jorge Pinto, Stein, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352504
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20140137
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The equations predicting maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max or peak)) presently in use in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) softwares in Brazil have not been adequately validated. These equations are very important for the diagnostic capacity of this method. OBJECTIVE: Build and validate a Brazilian Equation (BE) for prediction of VO(2peak) in comparison to the equation cited by Jones (JE) and the Wasserman algorithm (WA). METHODS: Treadmill evaluation was performed on 3119 individuals with CPET (breath by breath). The construction group (CG) of the equation consisted of 2495 healthy participants. The other 624 individuals were allocated to the external validation group (EVG). At the BE (derived from a multivariate regression model), age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and physical activity level were considered. The same equation was also tested in the EVG. Dispersion graphs and Bland-Altman analyses were built. RESULTS: In the CG, the mean age was 42.6 years, 51.5% were male, the average BMI was 27.2, and the physical activity distribution level was: 51.3% sedentary, 44.4% active and 4.3% athletes. An optimal correlation between the BE and the CPET measured VO(2peak) was observed (0.807). On the other hand, difference came up between the average VO(2peak) expected by the JE and WA and the CPET measured VO(2peak), as well as the one gotten from the BE (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: BE presents VO(2peak) values close to those directly measured by CPET, while Jones and Wasserman differ significantly from the real VO(2peak).