Cargando…

Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals

Statistical methods are frequently used in toxicology, yet it is not clear whether the methods employed by the studies are used consistently and conducted based on sound statistical grounds. The purpose of this paper is to describe statistical methods used in top toxicology journals. More specifical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Na, Jihye, Yang, Hyeri, Bae, SeungJin, Lim, Kyung-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society Of Toxicology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343012
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2014.30.3.185
_version_ 1782340861665738752
author Na, Jihye
Yang, Hyeri
Bae, SeungJin
Lim, Kyung-Min
author_facet Na, Jihye
Yang, Hyeri
Bae, SeungJin
Lim, Kyung-Min
author_sort Na, Jihye
collection PubMed
description Statistical methods are frequently used in toxicology, yet it is not clear whether the methods employed by the studies are used consistently and conducted based on sound statistical grounds. The purpose of this paper is to describe statistical methods used in top toxicology journals. More specifically, we sampled 30 papers published in 2014 from Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Archives of Toxicology, and Toxicological Science and described methodologies used to provide descriptive and inferential statistics. One hundred thirteen endpoints were observed in those 30 papers, and most studies had sample size less than 10, with the median and the mode being 6 and 3 & 6, respectively. Mean (105/113, 93%) was dominantly used to measure central tendency, and standard error of the mean (64/113, 57%) and standard deviation (39/113, 34%) were used to measure dispersion, while few studies provide justifications regarding why the methods being selected. Inferential statistics were frequently conducted (93/113, 82%), with one-way ANOVA being most popular (52/93, 56%), yet few studies conducted either normality or equal variance test. These results suggest that more consistent and appropriate use of statistical method is necessary which may enhance the role of toxicology in public health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4206745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society Of Toxicology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42067452014-10-23 Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals Na, Jihye Yang, Hyeri Bae, SeungJin Lim, Kyung-Min Toxicol Res Articles Statistical methods are frequently used in toxicology, yet it is not clear whether the methods employed by the studies are used consistently and conducted based on sound statistical grounds. The purpose of this paper is to describe statistical methods used in top toxicology journals. More specifically, we sampled 30 papers published in 2014 from Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Archives of Toxicology, and Toxicological Science and described methodologies used to provide descriptive and inferential statistics. One hundred thirteen endpoints were observed in those 30 papers, and most studies had sample size less than 10, with the median and the mode being 6 and 3 & 6, respectively. Mean (105/113, 93%) was dominantly used to measure central tendency, and standard error of the mean (64/113, 57%) and standard deviation (39/113, 34%) were used to measure dispersion, while few studies provide justifications regarding why the methods being selected. Inferential statistics were frequently conducted (93/113, 82%), with one-way ANOVA being most popular (52/93, 56%), yet few studies conducted either normality or equal variance test. These results suggest that more consistent and appropriate use of statistical method is necessary which may enhance the role of toxicology in public health. The Korean Society Of Toxicology 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4206745/ /pubmed/25343012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2014.30.3.185 Text en Copyright © 2014, The Korean Society Of Toxicology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Na, Jihye
Yang, Hyeri
Bae, SeungJin
Lim, Kyung-Min
Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals
title Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals
title_full Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals
title_fullStr Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals
title_short Analysis of Statistical Methods Currently used in Toxicology Journals
title_sort analysis of statistical methods currently used in toxicology journals
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343012
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2014.30.3.185
work_keys_str_mv AT najihye analysisofstatisticalmethodscurrentlyusedintoxicologyjournals
AT yanghyeri analysisofstatisticalmethodscurrentlyusedintoxicologyjournals
AT baeseungjin analysisofstatisticalmethodscurrentlyusedintoxicologyjournals
AT limkyungmin analysisofstatisticalmethodscurrentlyusedintoxicologyjournals