Cargando…

Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions

Background and aims. The imaging techniques commonly used for foreign body detection include plain radiography, xeroradiography, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography. The aim of the present study was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaviani, Farzaneh, Javad Rashid, Reza, Shahmoradi, Zahra, Gholamian, Masoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25346836
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.030
_version_ 1782340864699269120
author Kaviani, Farzaneh
Javad Rashid, Reza
Shahmoradi, Zahra
Gholamian, Masoud
author_facet Kaviani, Farzaneh
Javad Rashid, Reza
Shahmoradi, Zahra
Gholamian, Masoud
author_sort Kaviani, Farzaneh
collection PubMed
description Background and aims. The imaging techniques commonly used for foreign body detection include plain radiography, xeroradiography, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography. The aim of the present study was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with conventional CT scan in determination of the exact location of a foreign body in the maxillofacial area in vitro. Materials and methods. In this descriptive study, seven different materials were selected as foreign bodies with dimensions of approximately 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm. These materials consisted of metal, glass, wood, stone, plastic, graphite and tooth. These foreign bodies were placed in a sheep head between the corpus of the mandible and muscle, in the tongue and in an air space. One conventional CT scan and two CBCT scans were made on the models. Results. Tooth, metal, stone and glass foreign bodies were seen clearly on CT and CBCT scans made by NewTom at the smallest size in air. However, CBCT scan by NewTom was a more effective technique for visualization of foreign bodies in air compared to conventional CT. Foreign bodies measuring 0.5 mm made of metal, stone, glass, graphite and teeth were detected by all devices in muscle tissue and adjacent bone. Conclusion. According to the results, CBCT scans of NewTom and Planmeca are appropriate tools for detecting foreign bodies with relative high density in the maxillofacial area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4206759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42067592014-10-24 Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions Kaviani, Farzaneh Javad Rashid, Reza Shahmoradi, Zahra Gholamian, Masoud J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. The imaging techniques commonly used for foreign body detection include plain radiography, xeroradiography, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography. The aim of the present study was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with conventional CT scan in determination of the exact location of a foreign body in the maxillofacial area in vitro. Materials and methods. In this descriptive study, seven different materials were selected as foreign bodies with dimensions of approximately 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm. These materials consisted of metal, glass, wood, stone, plastic, graphite and tooth. These foreign bodies were placed in a sheep head between the corpus of the mandible and muscle, in the tongue and in an air space. One conventional CT scan and two CBCT scans were made on the models. Results. Tooth, metal, stone and glass foreign bodies were seen clearly on CT and CBCT scans made by NewTom at the smallest size in air. However, CBCT scan by NewTom was a more effective technique for visualization of foreign bodies in air compared to conventional CT. Foreign bodies measuring 0.5 mm made of metal, stone, glass, graphite and teeth were detected by all devices in muscle tissue and adjacent bone. Conclusion. According to the results, CBCT scans of NewTom and Planmeca are appropriate tools for detecting foreign bodies with relative high density in the maxillofacial area. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4206759/ /pubmed/25346836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.030 Text en © 2014 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaviani, Farzaneh
Javad Rashid, Reza
Shahmoradi, Zahra
Gholamian, Masoud
Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
title Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
title_full Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
title_fullStr Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
title_short Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
title_sort detection of foreign bodies by spiral computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial regions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25346836
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.030
work_keys_str_mv AT kavianifarzaneh detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions
AT javadrashidreza detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions
AT shahmoradizahra detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions
AT gholamianmasoud detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions