Cargando…
Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions
Background and aims. The imaging techniques commonly used for foreign body detection include plain radiography, xeroradiography, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography. The aim of the present study was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25346836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.030 |
_version_ | 1782340864699269120 |
---|---|
author | Kaviani, Farzaneh Javad Rashid, Reza Shahmoradi, Zahra Gholamian, Masoud |
author_facet | Kaviani, Farzaneh Javad Rashid, Reza Shahmoradi, Zahra Gholamian, Masoud |
author_sort | Kaviani, Farzaneh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims. The imaging techniques commonly used for foreign body detection include plain radiography, xeroradiography, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography. The aim of the present study was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with conventional CT scan in determination of the exact location of a foreign body in the maxillofacial area in vitro. Materials and methods. In this descriptive study, seven different materials were selected as foreign bodies with dimensions of approximately 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm. These materials consisted of metal, glass, wood, stone, plastic, graphite and tooth. These foreign bodies were placed in a sheep head between the corpus of the mandible and muscle, in the tongue and in an air space. One conventional CT scan and two CBCT scans were made on the models. Results. Tooth, metal, stone and glass foreign bodies were seen clearly on CT and CBCT scans made by NewTom at the smallest size in air. However, CBCT scan by NewTom was a more effective technique for visualization of foreign bodies in air compared to conventional CT. Foreign bodies measuring 0.5 mm made of metal, stone, glass, graphite and teeth were detected by all devices in muscle tissue and adjacent bone. Conclusion. According to the results, CBCT scans of NewTom and Planmeca are appropriate tools for detecting foreign bodies with relative high density in the maxillofacial area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4206759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42067592014-10-24 Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions Kaviani, Farzaneh Javad Rashid, Reza Shahmoradi, Zahra Gholamian, Masoud J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. The imaging techniques commonly used for foreign body detection include plain radiography, xeroradiography, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography. The aim of the present study was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with conventional CT scan in determination of the exact location of a foreign body in the maxillofacial area in vitro. Materials and methods. In this descriptive study, seven different materials were selected as foreign bodies with dimensions of approximately 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm. These materials consisted of metal, glass, wood, stone, plastic, graphite and tooth. These foreign bodies were placed in a sheep head between the corpus of the mandible and muscle, in the tongue and in an air space. One conventional CT scan and two CBCT scans were made on the models. Results. Tooth, metal, stone and glass foreign bodies were seen clearly on CT and CBCT scans made by NewTom at the smallest size in air. However, CBCT scan by NewTom was a more effective technique for visualization of foreign bodies in air compared to conventional CT. Foreign bodies measuring 0.5 mm made of metal, stone, glass, graphite and teeth were detected by all devices in muscle tissue and adjacent bone. Conclusion. According to the results, CBCT scans of NewTom and Planmeca are appropriate tools for detecting foreign bodies with relative high density in the maxillofacial area. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4206759/ /pubmed/25346836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.030 Text en © 2014 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaviani, Farzaneh Javad Rashid, Reza Shahmoradi, Zahra Gholamian, Masoud Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions |
title | Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions |
title_full | Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions |
title_fullStr | Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions |
title_short | Detection of Foreign Bodies by Spiral Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Regions |
title_sort | detection of foreign bodies by spiral computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial regions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25346836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavianifarzaneh detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions AT javadrashidreza detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions AT shahmoradizahra detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions AT gholamianmasoud detectionofforeignbodiesbyspiralcomputedtomographyandconebeamcomputedtomographyinmaxillofacialregions |