Cargando…
Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Currently, almost one million case reports are submitted to FAERS each year, making it a vast repository of drug safety information. Sometimes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0 |
_version_ | 1782340867295543296 |
---|---|
author | Hoffman, Keith B. Demakas, Andrea R. Dimbil, Mo Tatonetti, Nicholas P. Erdman, Colin B. |
author_facet | Hoffman, Keith B. Demakas, Andrea R. Dimbil, Mo Tatonetti, Nicholas P. Erdman, Colin B. |
author_sort | Hoffman, Keith B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Currently, almost one million case reports are submitted to FAERS each year, making it a vast repository of drug safety information. Sometimes cited as a limitation of FAERS, however, is the assumption that “stimulated reporting” of adverse events (AEs) occurs in response to warnings, alerts, and label changes that are issued by the FDA. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of “stimulated reporting” in the modern-day FAERS database. METHODS: One hundred drugs approved by the FDA between 2001 and 2010 were included in this analysis. FDA alerts were obtained by a comprehensive search of the FDA’s MedWatch and main websites. Publicly available FAERS data were used to assess the “primary suspect” AE reporting pattern for up to four quarters before, and after, the issuance of an FDA alert. RESULTS: A few drugs did demonstrate “stimulated reporting” trends. A majority of the drugs, however, showed little evidence for significant reporting changes associated with the issuance of alerts. When we compared the percentage changes in reporting after an FDA alert with those after a sham “control alert”, the overall reporting trends appeared to be quite similar. Of 100 drugs analyzed for short-term reporting trends, 21 real alerts and 25 sham alerts demonstrated an increase (greater than or equal to 1 %) in reporting. The long-term analysis of 91 drugs showed that 24 real alerts and 28 sham alerts demonstrated a greater than or equal to 1 % increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of modern day FAERS reporting is not significantly affected by the issuance of FDA alerts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4206770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42067702014-10-28 Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Hoffman, Keith B. Demakas, Andrea R. Dimbil, Mo Tatonetti, Nicholas P. Erdman, Colin B. Drug Saf Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Currently, almost one million case reports are submitted to FAERS each year, making it a vast repository of drug safety information. Sometimes cited as a limitation of FAERS, however, is the assumption that “stimulated reporting” of adverse events (AEs) occurs in response to warnings, alerts, and label changes that are issued by the FDA. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of “stimulated reporting” in the modern-day FAERS database. METHODS: One hundred drugs approved by the FDA between 2001 and 2010 were included in this analysis. FDA alerts were obtained by a comprehensive search of the FDA’s MedWatch and main websites. Publicly available FAERS data were used to assess the “primary suspect” AE reporting pattern for up to four quarters before, and after, the issuance of an FDA alert. RESULTS: A few drugs did demonstrate “stimulated reporting” trends. A majority of the drugs, however, showed little evidence for significant reporting changes associated with the issuance of alerts. When we compared the percentage changes in reporting after an FDA alert with those after a sham “control alert”, the overall reporting trends appeared to be quite similar. Of 100 drugs analyzed for short-term reporting trends, 21 real alerts and 25 sham alerts demonstrated an increase (greater than or equal to 1 %) in reporting. The long-term analysis of 91 drugs showed that 24 real alerts and 28 sham alerts demonstrated a greater than or equal to 1 % increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of modern day FAERS reporting is not significantly affected by the issuance of FDA alerts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-09-26 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4206770/ /pubmed/25255848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Hoffman, Keith B. Demakas, Andrea R. Dimbil, Mo Tatonetti, Nicholas P. Erdman, Colin B. Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) |
title | Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) |
title_full | Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) |
title_fullStr | Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) |
title_short | Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) |
title_sort | stimulated reporting: the impact of us food and drug administration-issued alerts on the adverse event reporting system (faers) |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmankeithb stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers AT demakasandrear stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers AT dimbilmo stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers AT tatonettinicholasp stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers AT erdmancolinb stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers |