Cargando…

Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Currently, almost one million case reports are submitted to FAERS each year, making it a vast repository of drug safety information. Sometimes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffman, Keith B., Demakas, Andrea R., Dimbil, Mo, Tatonetti, Nicholas P., Erdman, Colin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0
_version_ 1782340867295543296
author Hoffman, Keith B.
Demakas, Andrea R.
Dimbil, Mo
Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
Erdman, Colin B.
author_facet Hoffman, Keith B.
Demakas, Andrea R.
Dimbil, Mo
Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
Erdman, Colin B.
author_sort Hoffman, Keith B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Currently, almost one million case reports are submitted to FAERS each year, making it a vast repository of drug safety information. Sometimes cited as a limitation of FAERS, however, is the assumption that “stimulated reporting” of adverse events (AEs) occurs in response to warnings, alerts, and label changes that are issued by the FDA. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of “stimulated reporting” in the modern-day FAERS database. METHODS: One hundred drugs approved by the FDA between 2001 and 2010 were included in this analysis. FDA alerts were obtained by a comprehensive search of the FDA’s MedWatch and main websites. Publicly available FAERS data were used to assess the “primary suspect” AE reporting pattern for up to four quarters before, and after, the issuance of an FDA alert. RESULTS: A few drugs did demonstrate “stimulated reporting” trends. A majority of the drugs, however, showed little evidence for significant reporting changes associated with the issuance of alerts. When we compared the percentage changes in reporting after an FDA alert with those after a sham “control alert”, the overall reporting trends appeared to be quite similar. Of 100 drugs analyzed for short-term reporting trends, 21 real alerts and 25 sham alerts demonstrated an increase (greater than or equal to 1 %) in reporting. The long-term analysis of 91 drugs showed that 24 real alerts and 28 sham alerts demonstrated a greater than or equal to 1 % increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of modern day FAERS reporting is not significantly affected by the issuance of FDA alerts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4206770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42067702014-10-28 Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Hoffman, Keith B. Demakas, Andrea R. Dimbil, Mo Tatonetti, Nicholas P. Erdman, Colin B. Drug Saf Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Currently, almost one million case reports are submitted to FAERS each year, making it a vast repository of drug safety information. Sometimes cited as a limitation of FAERS, however, is the assumption that “stimulated reporting” of adverse events (AEs) occurs in response to warnings, alerts, and label changes that are issued by the FDA. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of “stimulated reporting” in the modern-day FAERS database. METHODS: One hundred drugs approved by the FDA between 2001 and 2010 were included in this analysis. FDA alerts were obtained by a comprehensive search of the FDA’s MedWatch and main websites. Publicly available FAERS data were used to assess the “primary suspect” AE reporting pattern for up to four quarters before, and after, the issuance of an FDA alert. RESULTS: A few drugs did demonstrate “stimulated reporting” trends. A majority of the drugs, however, showed little evidence for significant reporting changes associated with the issuance of alerts. When we compared the percentage changes in reporting after an FDA alert with those after a sham “control alert”, the overall reporting trends appeared to be quite similar. Of 100 drugs analyzed for short-term reporting trends, 21 real alerts and 25 sham alerts demonstrated an increase (greater than or equal to 1 %) in reporting. The long-term analysis of 91 drugs showed that 24 real alerts and 28 sham alerts demonstrated a greater than or equal to 1 % increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of modern day FAERS reporting is not significantly affected by the issuance of FDA alerts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-09-26 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4206770/ /pubmed/25255848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hoffman, Keith B.
Demakas, Andrea R.
Dimbil, Mo
Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
Erdman, Colin B.
Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
title Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
title_full Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
title_fullStr Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
title_full_unstemmed Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
title_short Stimulated Reporting: The Impact of US Food and Drug Administration-Issued Alerts on the Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
title_sort stimulated reporting: the impact of us food and drug administration-issued alerts on the adverse event reporting system (faers)
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0225-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmankeithb stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers
AT demakasandrear stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers
AT dimbilmo stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers
AT tatonettinicholasp stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers
AT erdmancolinb stimulatedreportingtheimpactofusfoodanddrugadministrationissuedalertsontheadverseeventreportingsystemfaers