Cargando…
Two Heads Are Better Than One, but How Much?: Evidence That People’s Use of Causal Integration Rules Does not Always Conform to Normative Standards
Many theories of causal learning and causal induction differ in their assumptions about how people combine the causal impact of several causes presented in compound. Some theories propose that when several causes are present, their joint causal impact is equal to the linear sum of the individual imp...
Autores principales: | Vadillo, Miguel A., Ortega-Castro, Nerea, Barberia, Itxaso, Baker, A. G. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hogrefe Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24614872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000255 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Persistence of Causal Illusions After Extensive Training
por: Barberia, Itxaso, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Individuals Who Believe in the Paranormal Expose Themselves to Biased Information and Develop More Causal Illusions than Nonbelievers in the Laboratory
por: Blanco, Fernando, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced
por: Matute, Helena, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Implementation and Assessment of an Intervention to Debias Adolescents against Causal Illusions
por: Barberia, Itxaso, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Causal inference—so much more than statistics
por: Pearce, Neil, et al.
Publicado: (2016)