Cargando…

Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE: While there is recent interest in using repeated deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holds, to improve radiotherapy delivery, breath-holding has risks. There are no published guidelines for monitoring patient safety, and there is little clinical awareness of the pron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkes, M J, Green, S, Stevens, A M, Clutton-Brock, T H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140454
_version_ 1782340929645969408
author Parkes, M J
Green, S
Stevens, A M
Clutton-Brock, T H
author_facet Parkes, M J
Green, S
Stevens, A M
Clutton-Brock, T H
author_sort Parkes, M J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: While there is recent interest in using repeated deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holds, to improve radiotherapy delivery, breath-holding has risks. There are no published guidelines for monitoring patient safety, and there is little clinical awareness of the pronounced blood pressure rise and the potential for gradual asphyxia that occur during breath-holding. We describe the blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding with air and test whether it can be abolished simply by pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. METHODS: We measured blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and heart rate in 12 healthy, untrained subjects performing breath-holds. RESULTS: Even for deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, the blood pressure rose progressively (e.g. mean systolic pressure rose from 133 ± 5 to 175 ± 8 mmHg at breakpoint, p < 0.005, and in two subjects, it reached 200 mmHg). Pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia prolonged breath-hold duration and prevented the development of asphyxia but failed to abolish the pressure rise. The pressure rise was not a function of breath-hold duration and was not signalled by any fall in heart rate (remaining at resting levels of 72 ± 2 beats per minute). CONCLUSION: Colleagues should be aware of the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding that so far is not easily prevented. In breast cancer patients scheduled for breath-holds, we recommend routine screening for heart, cardiovascular, renal and cerebrovascular disease, routine monitoring of patient blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holding and requesting patients to stop if systolic pressure rises consistently >180 mmHg and or SpO(2) falls <94%. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: There is recent interest in using deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holding techniques, to improve radiotherapy delivery. But there appears to be no clinical awareness of the risks to patients from breath-holding. We demonstrate the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, which we show cannot be prevented by the simple expedient of pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. We propose patient screening and safety guidelines for monitoring both blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holds and discuss their clinical implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4207152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42071522015-11-01 Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy Parkes, M J Green, S Stevens, A M Clutton-Brock, T H Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: While there is recent interest in using repeated deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holds, to improve radiotherapy delivery, breath-holding has risks. There are no published guidelines for monitoring patient safety, and there is little clinical awareness of the pronounced blood pressure rise and the potential for gradual asphyxia that occur during breath-holding. We describe the blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding with air and test whether it can be abolished simply by pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. METHODS: We measured blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and heart rate in 12 healthy, untrained subjects performing breath-holds. RESULTS: Even for deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, the blood pressure rose progressively (e.g. mean systolic pressure rose from 133 ± 5 to 175 ± 8 mmHg at breakpoint, p < 0.005, and in two subjects, it reached 200 mmHg). Pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia prolonged breath-hold duration and prevented the development of asphyxia but failed to abolish the pressure rise. The pressure rise was not a function of breath-hold duration and was not signalled by any fall in heart rate (remaining at resting levels of 72 ± 2 beats per minute). CONCLUSION: Colleagues should be aware of the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding that so far is not easily prevented. In breast cancer patients scheduled for breath-holds, we recommend routine screening for heart, cardiovascular, renal and cerebrovascular disease, routine monitoring of patient blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holding and requesting patients to stop if systolic pressure rises consistently >180 mmHg and or SpO(2) falls <94%. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: There is recent interest in using deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holding techniques, to improve radiotherapy delivery. But there appears to be no clinical awareness of the risks to patients from breath-holding. We demonstrate the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, which we show cannot be prevented by the simple expedient of pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. We propose patient screening and safety guidelines for monitoring both blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holds and discuss their clinical implications. The British Institute of Radiology. 2014-11 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4207152/ /pubmed/25189121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140454 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Parkes, M J
Green, S
Stevens, A M
Clutton-Brock, T H
Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
title Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
title_full Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
title_fullStr Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
title_short Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
title_sort assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140454
work_keys_str_mv AT parkesmj assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy
AT greens assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy
AT stevensam assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy
AT cluttonbrockth assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy