Cargando…
Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy
OBJECTIVE: While there is recent interest in using repeated deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holds, to improve radiotherapy delivery, breath-holding has risks. There are no published guidelines for monitoring patient safety, and there is little clinical awareness of the pron...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140454 |
_version_ | 1782340929645969408 |
---|---|
author | Parkes, M J Green, S Stevens, A M Clutton-Brock, T H |
author_facet | Parkes, M J Green, S Stevens, A M Clutton-Brock, T H |
author_sort | Parkes, M J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: While there is recent interest in using repeated deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holds, to improve radiotherapy delivery, breath-holding has risks. There are no published guidelines for monitoring patient safety, and there is little clinical awareness of the pronounced blood pressure rise and the potential for gradual asphyxia that occur during breath-holding. We describe the blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding with air and test whether it can be abolished simply by pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. METHODS: We measured blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and heart rate in 12 healthy, untrained subjects performing breath-holds. RESULTS: Even for deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, the blood pressure rose progressively (e.g. mean systolic pressure rose from 133 ± 5 to 175 ± 8 mmHg at breakpoint, p < 0.005, and in two subjects, it reached 200 mmHg). Pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia prolonged breath-hold duration and prevented the development of asphyxia but failed to abolish the pressure rise. The pressure rise was not a function of breath-hold duration and was not signalled by any fall in heart rate (remaining at resting levels of 72 ± 2 beats per minute). CONCLUSION: Colleagues should be aware of the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding that so far is not easily prevented. In breast cancer patients scheduled for breath-holds, we recommend routine screening for heart, cardiovascular, renal and cerebrovascular disease, routine monitoring of patient blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holding and requesting patients to stop if systolic pressure rises consistently >180 mmHg and or SpO(2) falls <94%. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: There is recent interest in using deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holding techniques, to improve radiotherapy delivery. But there appears to be no clinical awareness of the risks to patients from breath-holding. We demonstrate the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, which we show cannot be prevented by the simple expedient of pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. We propose patient screening and safety guidelines for monitoring both blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holds and discuss their clinical implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4207152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42071522015-11-01 Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy Parkes, M J Green, S Stevens, A M Clutton-Brock, T H Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: While there is recent interest in using repeated deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holds, to improve radiotherapy delivery, breath-holding has risks. There are no published guidelines for monitoring patient safety, and there is little clinical awareness of the pronounced blood pressure rise and the potential for gradual asphyxia that occur during breath-holding. We describe the blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding with air and test whether it can be abolished simply by pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. METHODS: We measured blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and heart rate in 12 healthy, untrained subjects performing breath-holds. RESULTS: Even for deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, the blood pressure rose progressively (e.g. mean systolic pressure rose from 133 ± 5 to 175 ± 8 mmHg at breakpoint, p < 0.005, and in two subjects, it reached 200 mmHg). Pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia prolonged breath-hold duration and prevented the development of asphyxia but failed to abolish the pressure rise. The pressure rise was not a function of breath-hold duration and was not signalled by any fall in heart rate (remaining at resting levels of 72 ± 2 beats per minute). CONCLUSION: Colleagues should be aware of the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holding that so far is not easily prevented. In breast cancer patients scheduled for breath-holds, we recommend routine screening for heart, cardiovascular, renal and cerebrovascular disease, routine monitoring of patient blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holding and requesting patients to stop if systolic pressure rises consistently >180 mmHg and or SpO(2) falls <94%. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: There is recent interest in using deep inspiratory breath-holds, or prolonged single breath-holding techniques, to improve radiotherapy delivery. But there appears to be no clinical awareness of the risks to patients from breath-holding. We demonstrate the progressive blood pressure rise during deep inspiratory breath-holds with air, which we show cannot be prevented by the simple expedient of pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. We propose patient screening and safety guidelines for monitoring both blood pressure and SpO(2) during breath-holds and discuss their clinical implications. The British Institute of Radiology. 2014-11 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4207152/ /pubmed/25189121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140454 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Parkes, M J Green, S Stevens, A M Clutton-Brock, T H Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
title | Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
title_full | Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
title_short | Assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
title_sort | assessing and ensuring patient safety during breath-holding for radiotherapy |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkesmj assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy AT greens assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy AT stevensam assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy AT cluttonbrockth assessingandensuringpatientsafetyduringbreathholdingforradiotherapy |