Cargando…

A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield

OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesised that firstborn children and only children are more intelligent with higher intelligence scores having been observed in firstborn or only children. Evidence of the increased intelligence has been suggested by the fact that 21/23 (91%) of US astronauts, 23/43 (53%) of US...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clayton, Sarah, Apperley, Elizabeth, Hannon, Fergus, Karia, Anika, Baxter, Victoria, Julious, Steven A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414533327
_version_ 1782340947024019456
author Clayton, Sarah
Apperley, Elizabeth
Hannon, Fergus
Karia, Anika
Baxter, Victoria
Julious, Steven A
author_facet Clayton, Sarah
Apperley, Elizabeth
Hannon, Fergus
Karia, Anika
Baxter, Victoria
Julious, Steven A
author_sort Clayton, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesised that firstborn children and only children are more intelligent with higher intelligence scores having been observed in firstborn or only children. Evidence of the increased intelligence has been suggested by the fact that 21/23 (91%) of US astronauts, 23/43 (53%) of US presidents and between 75 and 80% of students at Harvard are firstborn or only children. It is of interest to investigate, therefore, whether a high achieving career such as medicine has a disproportionate number of firstborn or only children. DESIGN: A survey of medical students. SETTING: The University of Sheffield Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: All students studying medicine in the academic year 2011–2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of firstborn or only children. RESULTS: There was a disproportionate number of students who were firstborn or only children: 53% (95% CI 49 to 58%). The expected percentage is 39.8% and therefore we can reject the null hypothesis. The results were consistent across all phases of study. CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher than expected proportion of medical students at the University of Sheffield who are firstborn or only children. The data though highlight the issue of comparing populations. Here we are comparing a population of medical students with a general population. A comparison which may not be appropriate as medical students may be drawn from a subsample of the general population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4207295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42072952014-10-28 A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield Clayton, Sarah Apperley, Elizabeth Hannon, Fergus Karia, Anika Baxter, Victoria Julious, Steven A JRSM Open Research OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesised that firstborn children and only children are more intelligent with higher intelligence scores having been observed in firstborn or only children. Evidence of the increased intelligence has been suggested by the fact that 21/23 (91%) of US astronauts, 23/43 (53%) of US presidents and between 75 and 80% of students at Harvard are firstborn or only children. It is of interest to investigate, therefore, whether a high achieving career such as medicine has a disproportionate number of firstborn or only children. DESIGN: A survey of medical students. SETTING: The University of Sheffield Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: All students studying medicine in the academic year 2011–2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of firstborn or only children. RESULTS: There was a disproportionate number of students who were firstborn or only children: 53% (95% CI 49 to 58%). The expected percentage is 39.8% and therefore we can reject the null hypothesis. The results were consistent across all phases of study. CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher than expected proportion of medical students at the University of Sheffield who are firstborn or only children. The data though highlight the issue of comparing populations. Here we are comparing a population of medical students with a general population. A comparison which may not be appropriate as medical students may be drawn from a subsample of the general population. SAGE Publications 2014-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4207295/ /pubmed/25352987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414533327 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Research
Clayton, Sarah
Apperley, Elizabeth
Hannon, Fergus
Karia, Anika
Baxter, Victoria
Julious, Steven A
A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
title A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
title_full A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
title_fullStr A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
title_full_unstemmed A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
title_short A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
title_sort survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the university of sheffield
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414533327
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonsarah asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT apperleyelizabeth asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT hannonfergus asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT kariaanika asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT baxtervictoria asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT juliousstevena asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT claytonsarah surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT apperleyelizabeth surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT hannonfergus surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT kariaanika surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT baxtervictoria surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield
AT juliousstevena surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield