Cargando…
A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield
OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesised that firstborn children and only children are more intelligent with higher intelligence scores having been observed in firstborn or only children. Evidence of the increased intelligence has been suggested by the fact that 21/23 (91%) of US astronauts, 23/43 (53%) of US...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414533327 |
_version_ | 1782340947024019456 |
---|---|
author | Clayton, Sarah Apperley, Elizabeth Hannon, Fergus Karia, Anika Baxter, Victoria Julious, Steven A |
author_facet | Clayton, Sarah Apperley, Elizabeth Hannon, Fergus Karia, Anika Baxter, Victoria Julious, Steven A |
author_sort | Clayton, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesised that firstborn children and only children are more intelligent with higher intelligence scores having been observed in firstborn or only children. Evidence of the increased intelligence has been suggested by the fact that 21/23 (91%) of US astronauts, 23/43 (53%) of US presidents and between 75 and 80% of students at Harvard are firstborn or only children. It is of interest to investigate, therefore, whether a high achieving career such as medicine has a disproportionate number of firstborn or only children. DESIGN: A survey of medical students. SETTING: The University of Sheffield Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: All students studying medicine in the academic year 2011–2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of firstborn or only children. RESULTS: There was a disproportionate number of students who were firstborn or only children: 53% (95% CI 49 to 58%). The expected percentage is 39.8% and therefore we can reject the null hypothesis. The results were consistent across all phases of study. CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher than expected proportion of medical students at the University of Sheffield who are firstborn or only children. The data though highlight the issue of comparing populations. Here we are comparing a population of medical students with a general population. A comparison which may not be appropriate as medical students may be drawn from a subsample of the general population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4207295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42072952014-10-28 A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield Clayton, Sarah Apperley, Elizabeth Hannon, Fergus Karia, Anika Baxter, Victoria Julious, Steven A JRSM Open Research OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesised that firstborn children and only children are more intelligent with higher intelligence scores having been observed in firstborn or only children. Evidence of the increased intelligence has been suggested by the fact that 21/23 (91%) of US astronauts, 23/43 (53%) of US presidents and between 75 and 80% of students at Harvard are firstborn or only children. It is of interest to investigate, therefore, whether a high achieving career such as medicine has a disproportionate number of firstborn or only children. DESIGN: A survey of medical students. SETTING: The University of Sheffield Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: All students studying medicine in the academic year 2011–2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of firstborn or only children. RESULTS: There was a disproportionate number of students who were firstborn or only children: 53% (95% CI 49 to 58%). The expected percentage is 39.8% and therefore we can reject the null hypothesis. The results were consistent across all phases of study. CONCLUSIONS: There is a higher than expected proportion of medical students at the University of Sheffield who are firstborn or only children. The data though highlight the issue of comparing populations. Here we are comparing a population of medical students with a general population. A comparison which may not be appropriate as medical students may be drawn from a subsample of the general population. SAGE Publications 2014-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4207295/ /pubmed/25352987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414533327 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | Research Clayton, Sarah Apperley, Elizabeth Hannon, Fergus Karia, Anika Baxter, Victoria Julious, Steven A A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield |
title | A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield |
title_full | A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield |
title_fullStr | A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield |
title_short | A survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the University of Sheffield |
title_sort | survey of birth order status of students studying for medical degree at the university of sheffield |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270414533327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claytonsarah asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT apperleyelizabeth asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT hannonfergus asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT kariaanika asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT baxtervictoria asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT juliousstevena asurveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT claytonsarah surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT apperleyelizabeth surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT hannonfergus surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT kariaanika surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT baxtervictoria surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield AT juliousstevena surveyofbirthorderstatusofstudentsstudyingformedicaldegreeattheuniversityofsheffield |