Cargando…

Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle

BACKGROUND: The major obstacles for the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle are the variety of breeds and in general, small numbers of genotyped and phenotyped individuals per breed. The Australian Beef Cooperative Research Center (Beef CRC) investigated these issues by der...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boerner, Vinzent, Johnston, David J, Tier, Bruce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0061-9
_version_ 1782341048185389056
author Boerner, Vinzent
Johnston, David J
Tier, Bruce
author_facet Boerner, Vinzent
Johnston, David J
Tier, Bruce
author_sort Boerner, Vinzent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The major obstacles for the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle are the variety of breeds and in general, small numbers of genotyped and phenotyped individuals per breed. The Australian Beef Cooperative Research Center (Beef CRC) investigated these issues by deriving genomic prediction equations (PE) from a training set of animals that covers a range of breeds and crosses including Angus, Murray Grey, Shorthorn, Hereford, Brahman, Belmont Red, Santa Gertrudis and Tropical Composite. This paper presents accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values (GEBV) that were calculated from these PE in the commercial pure-breed beef cattle seed stock sector. METHODS: PE derived by the Beef CRC from multi-breed and pure-breed training populations were applied to genotyped Angus, Limousin and Brahman sires and young animals, but with no pure-breed Limousin in the training population. The accuracy of the resulting GEBV was assessed by their genetic correlation to their phenotypic target trait in a bi-variate REML approach that models GEBV as trait observations. RESULTS: Accuracies of most GEBV for Angus and Brahman were between 0.1 and 0.4, with accuracies for abattoir carcass traits generally greater than for live animal body composition traits and reproduction traits. Estimated accuracies greater than 0.5 were only observed for Brahman abattoir carcass traits and for Angus carcass rib fat. Averaged across traits within breeds, accuracies of GEBV were highest when PE from the pooled across-breed training population were used. However, for the Angus and Brahman breeds the difference in accuracy from using pure-breed PE was small. For the Limousin breed no reasonable results could be achieved for any trait. CONCLUSION: Although accuracies were generally low compared to published accuracies estimated within breeds, they are in line with those derived in other multi-breed populations. Thus PE developed by the Beef CRC can contribute to the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle breeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4207895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42078952014-11-06 Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle Boerner, Vinzent Johnston, David J Tier, Bruce Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: The major obstacles for the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle are the variety of breeds and in general, small numbers of genotyped and phenotyped individuals per breed. The Australian Beef Cooperative Research Center (Beef CRC) investigated these issues by deriving genomic prediction equations (PE) from a training set of animals that covers a range of breeds and crosses including Angus, Murray Grey, Shorthorn, Hereford, Brahman, Belmont Red, Santa Gertrudis and Tropical Composite. This paper presents accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values (GEBV) that were calculated from these PE in the commercial pure-breed beef cattle seed stock sector. METHODS: PE derived by the Beef CRC from multi-breed and pure-breed training populations were applied to genotyped Angus, Limousin and Brahman sires and young animals, but with no pure-breed Limousin in the training population. The accuracy of the resulting GEBV was assessed by their genetic correlation to their phenotypic target trait in a bi-variate REML approach that models GEBV as trait observations. RESULTS: Accuracies of most GEBV for Angus and Brahman were between 0.1 and 0.4, with accuracies for abattoir carcass traits generally greater than for live animal body composition traits and reproduction traits. Estimated accuracies greater than 0.5 were only observed for Brahman abattoir carcass traits and for Angus carcass rib fat. Averaged across traits within breeds, accuracies of GEBV were highest when PE from the pooled across-breed training population were used. However, for the Angus and Brahman breeds the difference in accuracy from using pure-breed PE was small. For the Limousin breed no reasonable results could be achieved for any trait. CONCLUSION: Although accuracies were generally low compared to published accuracies estimated within breeds, they are in line with those derived in other multi-breed populations. Thus PE developed by the Beef CRC can contribute to the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle breeding. BioMed Central 2014-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4207895/ /pubmed/25927468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0061-9 Text en © Boerner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Boerner, Vinzent
Johnston, David J
Tier, Bruce
Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle
title Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle
title_full Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle
title_fullStr Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle
title_short Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle
title_sort accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in australian beef cattle
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0061-9
work_keys_str_mv AT boernervinzent accuraciesofgenomicallyestimatedbreedingvaluesfrompurebreedandacrossbreedpredictionsinaustralianbeefcattle
AT johnstondavidj accuraciesofgenomicallyestimatedbreedingvaluesfrompurebreedandacrossbreedpredictionsinaustralianbeefcattle
AT tierbruce accuraciesofgenomicallyestimatedbreedingvaluesfrompurebreedandacrossbreedpredictionsinaustralianbeefcattle