Cargando…

Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls

The functional reach (FR) test as a complex measure of balance including limits of stability has been proven to differentiate between patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and controls (CO). Recently, it has been shown that the instrumentation of the FR (iFR) with a wearable sensor may increase thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasmann, Sandra E., Berg, Daniela, Hobert, Markus A., Weiss, David, Lindemann, Ulrich, Streffer, Johannes, Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga, Maetzler, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4208400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00286
_version_ 1782341124307812352
author Hasmann, Sandra E.
Berg, Daniela
Hobert, Markus A.
Weiss, David
Lindemann, Ulrich
Streffer, Johannes
Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga
Maetzler, Walter
author_facet Hasmann, Sandra E.
Berg, Daniela
Hobert, Markus A.
Weiss, David
Lindemann, Ulrich
Streffer, Johannes
Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga
Maetzler, Walter
author_sort Hasmann, Sandra E.
collection PubMed
description The functional reach (FR) test as a complex measure of balance including limits of stability has been proven to differentiate between patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and controls (CO). Recently, it has been shown that the instrumentation of the FR (iFR) with a wearable sensor may increase this diagnostic accuracy. This cross-sectional study aimed at investigating whether the iFR has the potential to differentiate individuals with high risk for PD (HRPD) from CO, as the delineation of such individuals would allow for, e.g., early neuromodulation. Thirteen PD patients, 13 CO, and 31 HRPD were investigated. HRPD was defined by presence of an enlarged area of hyperechogenicity in the mesencephalon on transcranial sonography and either one motor sign or two risk and prodromal markers of PD. All participants were asked to reach with their right arm forward as far as possible and hold this position for 10 s. During this period, sway parameters were assessed with an accelerometer (Dynaport, McRoberts) worn at the lower back. Extracted parameters that differed significantly between PD patients and CO in our cohort [FR distance (shorter in PD), anterior–posterior and mediolateral acceleration (both lower in PD)] as well as JERK, which has been shown to differentiate HRPD from CO and PD in a previous study, were included in a model, which was then used to differentiate HRPD from CO. The model yielded an area under the curve of 0.77, with a specificity of 85%, and a sensitivity of 74%. These results suggest that the iFR can contribute to an assessment panel focusing on the definition of HRPD individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4208400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42084002014-11-10 Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls Hasmann, Sandra E. Berg, Daniela Hobert, Markus A. Weiss, David Lindemann, Ulrich Streffer, Johannes Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga Maetzler, Walter Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience The functional reach (FR) test as a complex measure of balance including limits of stability has been proven to differentiate between patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and controls (CO). Recently, it has been shown that the instrumentation of the FR (iFR) with a wearable sensor may increase this diagnostic accuracy. This cross-sectional study aimed at investigating whether the iFR has the potential to differentiate individuals with high risk for PD (HRPD) from CO, as the delineation of such individuals would allow for, e.g., early neuromodulation. Thirteen PD patients, 13 CO, and 31 HRPD were investigated. HRPD was defined by presence of an enlarged area of hyperechogenicity in the mesencephalon on transcranial sonography and either one motor sign or two risk and prodromal markers of PD. All participants were asked to reach with their right arm forward as far as possible and hold this position for 10 s. During this period, sway parameters were assessed with an accelerometer (Dynaport, McRoberts) worn at the lower back. Extracted parameters that differed significantly between PD patients and CO in our cohort [FR distance (shorter in PD), anterior–posterior and mediolateral acceleration (both lower in PD)] as well as JERK, which has been shown to differentiate HRPD from CO and PD in a previous study, were included in a model, which was then used to differentiate HRPD from CO. The model yielded an area under the curve of 0.77, with a specificity of 85%, and a sensitivity of 74%. These results suggest that the iFR can contribute to an assessment panel focusing on the definition of HRPD individuals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4208400/ /pubmed/25386137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00286 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hasmann, Berg, Hobert, Weiss, Lindemann, Streffer, Liepelt-Scarfone and Maetzler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hasmann, Sandra E.
Berg, Daniela
Hobert, Markus A.
Weiss, David
Lindemann, Ulrich
Streffer, Johannes
Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga
Maetzler, Walter
Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls
title Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls
title_full Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls
title_fullStr Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls
title_full_unstemmed Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls
title_short Instrumented Functional Reach Test Differentiates Individuals at High Risk for Parkinson’s Disease from Controls
title_sort instrumented functional reach test differentiates individuals at high risk for parkinson’s disease from controls
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4208400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00286
work_keys_str_mv AT hasmannsandrae instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT bergdaniela instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT hobertmarkusa instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT weissdavid instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT lindemannulrich instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT strefferjohannes instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT liepeltscarfoneinga instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols
AT maetzlerwalter instrumentedfunctionalreachtestdifferentiatesindividualsathighriskforparkinsonsdiseasefromcontrols