Cargando…

Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture

Background. Lichtenstein tension free repair is the most commonly used technique due to cost effectiveness, low recurrence rate, and better patient satisfaction. This study was done to compare the duration of surgery and postoperative outcome of securing mesh with skin staples versus polypropylene s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munghate, Anand, Mittal, Sushil, Singh, Harnam, Singh, Gurpreet, Yadav, Manish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4208493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/958634
_version_ 1782341141658599424
author Munghate, Anand
Mittal, Sushil
Singh, Harnam
Singh, Gurpreet
Yadav, Manish
author_facet Munghate, Anand
Mittal, Sushil
Singh, Harnam
Singh, Gurpreet
Yadav, Manish
author_sort Munghate, Anand
collection PubMed
description Background. Lichtenstein tension free repair is the most commonly used technique due to cost effectiveness, low recurrence rate, and better patient satisfaction. This study was done to compare the duration of surgery and postoperative outcome of securing mesh with skin staples versus polypropylene sutures in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Materials and Methods. A total of 96 patients with inguinal hernia undergoing Lichtenstein mesh repair were randomly assigned into two groups. The mesh was secured either by using skin staples (group I) or polypropylene sutures (group II). Results. The operation time was significantly reduced from mesh insertion to completion of skin closure in group I (mean 20.7 min) as compared to group II (mean 32.7 min) with significant P value (P < 0.0001) and less complication rate in group I as compared to group II. Conclusion. Mesh fixation with skin staples is as effective as conventional sutures with added advantage of significant reduction in the operating time and complications or recurrence. The staples can be applied much more quickly than sutures for fixing the mesh, thus saving the operating time. Infection rate is significantly decreased with staples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4208493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42084932014-11-06 Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture Munghate, Anand Mittal, Sushil Singh, Harnam Singh, Gurpreet Yadav, Manish Surg Res Pract Clinical Study Background. Lichtenstein tension free repair is the most commonly used technique due to cost effectiveness, low recurrence rate, and better patient satisfaction. This study was done to compare the duration of surgery and postoperative outcome of securing mesh with skin staples versus polypropylene sutures in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Materials and Methods. A total of 96 patients with inguinal hernia undergoing Lichtenstein mesh repair were randomly assigned into two groups. The mesh was secured either by using skin staples (group I) or polypropylene sutures (group II). Results. The operation time was significantly reduced from mesh insertion to completion of skin closure in group I (mean 20.7 min) as compared to group II (mean 32.7 min) with significant P value (P < 0.0001) and less complication rate in group I as compared to group II. Conclusion. Mesh fixation with skin staples is as effective as conventional sutures with added advantage of significant reduction in the operating time and complications or recurrence. The staples can be applied much more quickly than sutures for fixing the mesh, thus saving the operating time. Infection rate is significantly decreased with staples. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4208493/ /pubmed/25379567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/958634 Text en Copyright © 2014 Anand Munghate et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Munghate, Anand
Mittal, Sushil
Singh, Harnam
Singh, Gurpreet
Yadav, Manish
Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture
title Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture
title_full Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture
title_fullStr Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture
title_full_unstemmed Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture
title_short Skin Staples: A Safe Technique for Securing Mesh in Lichtensteins Hernioplasty as Compared to Suture
title_sort skin staples: a safe technique for securing mesh in lichtensteins hernioplasty as compared to suture
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4208493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/958634
work_keys_str_mv AT munghateanand skinstaplesasafetechniqueforsecuringmeshinlichtensteinshernioplastyascomparedtosuture
AT mittalsushil skinstaplesasafetechniqueforsecuringmeshinlichtensteinshernioplastyascomparedtosuture
AT singhharnam skinstaplesasafetechniqueforsecuringmeshinlichtensteinshernioplastyascomparedtosuture
AT singhgurpreet skinstaplesasafetechniqueforsecuringmeshinlichtensteinshernioplastyascomparedtosuture
AT yadavmanish skinstaplesasafetechniqueforsecuringmeshinlichtensteinshernioplastyascomparedtosuture