Cargando…

Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data

BACKGROUND: In prognostic studies, the lasso technique is attractive since it improves the quality of predictions by shrinking regression coefficients, compared to predictions based on a model fitted via unpenalized maximum likelihood. Since some coefficients are set to zero, parsimony is achieved a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musoro, Jammbe Z, Zwinderman, Aeilko H, Puhan, Milo A, ter Riet, Gerben, Geskus, Ronald B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25323009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-116
_version_ 1782341210927529984
author Musoro, Jammbe Z
Zwinderman, Aeilko H
Puhan, Milo A
ter Riet, Gerben
Geskus, Ronald B
author_facet Musoro, Jammbe Z
Zwinderman, Aeilko H
Puhan, Milo A
ter Riet, Gerben
Geskus, Ronald B
author_sort Musoro, Jammbe Z
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In prognostic studies, the lasso technique is attractive since it improves the quality of predictions by shrinking regression coefficients, compared to predictions based on a model fitted via unpenalized maximum likelihood. Since some coefficients are set to zero, parsimony is achieved as well. It is unclear whether the performance of a model fitted using the lasso still shows some optimism. Bootstrap methods have been advocated to quantify optimism and generalize model performance to new subjects. It is unclear how resampling should be performed in the presence of multiply imputed data. METHOD: The data were based on a cohort of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients. We constructed models to predict Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea 6 months ahead. Optimism of the lasso model was investigated by comparing 4 approaches of handling multiply imputed data in the bootstrap procedure, using the study data and simulated data sets. In the first 3 approaches, data sets that had been completed via multiple imputation (MI) were resampled, while the fourth approach resampled the incomplete data set and then performed MI. RESULTS: The discriminative model performance of the lasso was optimistic. There was suboptimal calibration due to over-shrinkage. The estimate of optimism was sensitive to the choice of handling imputed data in the bootstrap resampling procedure. Resampling the completed data sets underestimates optimism, especially if, within a bootstrap step, selected individuals differ over the imputed data sets. Incorporating the MI procedure in the validation yields estimates of optimism that are closer to the true value, albeit slightly too larger. CONCLUSION: Performance of prognostic models constructed using the lasso technique can be optimistic as well. Results of the internal validation are sensitive to how bootstrap resampling is performed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-116) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42090422014-10-28 Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data Musoro, Jammbe Z Zwinderman, Aeilko H Puhan, Milo A ter Riet, Gerben Geskus, Ronald B BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In prognostic studies, the lasso technique is attractive since it improves the quality of predictions by shrinking regression coefficients, compared to predictions based on a model fitted via unpenalized maximum likelihood. Since some coefficients are set to zero, parsimony is achieved as well. It is unclear whether the performance of a model fitted using the lasso still shows some optimism. Bootstrap methods have been advocated to quantify optimism and generalize model performance to new subjects. It is unclear how resampling should be performed in the presence of multiply imputed data. METHOD: The data were based on a cohort of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients. We constructed models to predict Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea 6 months ahead. Optimism of the lasso model was investigated by comparing 4 approaches of handling multiply imputed data in the bootstrap procedure, using the study data and simulated data sets. In the first 3 approaches, data sets that had been completed via multiple imputation (MI) were resampled, while the fourth approach resampled the incomplete data set and then performed MI. RESULTS: The discriminative model performance of the lasso was optimistic. There was suboptimal calibration due to over-shrinkage. The estimate of optimism was sensitive to the choice of handling imputed data in the bootstrap resampling procedure. Resampling the completed data sets underestimates optimism, especially if, within a bootstrap step, selected individuals differ over the imputed data sets. Incorporating the MI procedure in the validation yields estimates of optimism that are closer to the true value, albeit slightly too larger. CONCLUSION: Performance of prognostic models constructed using the lasso technique can be optimistic as well. Results of the internal validation are sensitive to how bootstrap resampling is performed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-116) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4209042/ /pubmed/25323009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-116 Text en © Musoro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Musoro, Jammbe Z
Zwinderman, Aeilko H
Puhan, Milo A
ter Riet, Gerben
Geskus, Ronald B
Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
title Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
title_full Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
title_fullStr Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
title_full_unstemmed Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
title_short Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
title_sort validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25323009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-116
work_keys_str_mv AT musorojammbez validationofpredictionmodelsbasedonlassoregressionwithmultiplyimputeddata
AT zwindermanaeilkoh validationofpredictionmodelsbasedonlassoregressionwithmultiplyimputeddata
AT puhanmiloa validationofpredictionmodelsbasedonlassoregressionwithmultiplyimputeddata
AT terrietgerben validationofpredictionmodelsbasedonlassoregressionwithmultiplyimputeddata
AT geskusronaldb validationofpredictionmodelsbasedonlassoregressionwithmultiplyimputeddata