Cargando…

A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation

BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key quality outcome for modern health services, but most existing survey methods are long and setting-specific. We identified the need for a short generic questionnaire for tracking patient experience. METHODS: We describe the development and validation of the how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benson, Tim, Potts, Henry WW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25331177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z
_version_ 1782341220648878080
author Benson, Tim
Potts, Henry WW
author_facet Benson, Tim
Potts, Henry WW
author_sort Benson, Tim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key quality outcome for modern health services, but most existing survey methods are long and setting-specific. We identified the need for a short generic questionnaire for tracking patient experience. METHODS: We describe the development and validation of the howRwe questionnaire. This has two items relating to clinical care (treat you kindly; listen and explain) and two items relating to the organisation of care (see you promptly; well organised) as perceived by patients. Each item has four responses (excellent, good, fair and poor). The questionnaire was trialled in 828 patients in an orthopaedic pre-operative assessment clinic (PAC). RESULTS: The howRwe questionnaire is shorter (29 words) and more readable (Flesch-Kincaid grade score 2.2) than other questionnaires with broadly similar objectives. Psychometric properties in this sample are good with Cronbach’s α=0.82. Following a change to the appointments system in the clinic, howRwe showed improvement in promptness and organisation, but not in kindness and communication, showing that it can distinguish between the clinical and organisational aspects of patient experience. CONCLUSIONS: howRwe meets the criteria for a short generic patient experience questionnaire that is suitable for frequent use. In the validation study of PAC patients, it showed good psychometric properties and concurrent, construct and discriminant validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42090842014-10-28 A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation Benson, Tim Potts, Henry WW BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key quality outcome for modern health services, but most existing survey methods are long and setting-specific. We identified the need for a short generic questionnaire for tracking patient experience. METHODS: We describe the development and validation of the howRwe questionnaire. This has two items relating to clinical care (treat you kindly; listen and explain) and two items relating to the organisation of care (see you promptly; well organised) as perceived by patients. Each item has four responses (excellent, good, fair and poor). The questionnaire was trialled in 828 patients in an orthopaedic pre-operative assessment clinic (PAC). RESULTS: The howRwe questionnaire is shorter (29 words) and more readable (Flesch-Kincaid grade score 2.2) than other questionnaires with broadly similar objectives. Psychometric properties in this sample are good with Cronbach’s α=0.82. Following a change to the appointments system in the clinic, howRwe showed improvement in promptness and organisation, but not in kindness and communication, showing that it can distinguish between the clinical and organisational aspects of patient experience. CONCLUSIONS: howRwe meets the criteria for a short generic patient experience questionnaire that is suitable for frequent use. In the validation study of PAC patients, it showed good psychometric properties and concurrent, construct and discriminant validity. BioMed Central 2014-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4209084/ /pubmed/25331177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z Text en © Benson and Potts; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benson, Tim
Potts, Henry WW
A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
title A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
title_full A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
title_fullStr A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
title_full_unstemmed A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
title_short A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
title_sort short generic patient experience questionnaire: howrwe development and validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25331177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bensontim ashortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation
AT pottshenryww ashortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation
AT bensontim shortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation
AT pottshenryww shortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation