Cargando…
A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation
BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key quality outcome for modern health services, but most existing survey methods are long and setting-specific. We identified the need for a short generic questionnaire for tracking patient experience. METHODS: We describe the development and validation of the how...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25331177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z |
_version_ | 1782341220648878080 |
---|---|
author | Benson, Tim Potts, Henry WW |
author_facet | Benson, Tim Potts, Henry WW |
author_sort | Benson, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key quality outcome for modern health services, but most existing survey methods are long and setting-specific. We identified the need for a short generic questionnaire for tracking patient experience. METHODS: We describe the development and validation of the howRwe questionnaire. This has two items relating to clinical care (treat you kindly; listen and explain) and two items relating to the organisation of care (see you promptly; well organised) as perceived by patients. Each item has four responses (excellent, good, fair and poor). The questionnaire was trialled in 828 patients in an orthopaedic pre-operative assessment clinic (PAC). RESULTS: The howRwe questionnaire is shorter (29 words) and more readable (Flesch-Kincaid grade score 2.2) than other questionnaires with broadly similar objectives. Psychometric properties in this sample are good with Cronbach’s α=0.82. Following a change to the appointments system in the clinic, howRwe showed improvement in promptness and organisation, but not in kindness and communication, showing that it can distinguish between the clinical and organisational aspects of patient experience. CONCLUSIONS: howRwe meets the criteria for a short generic patient experience questionnaire that is suitable for frequent use. In the validation study of PAC patients, it showed good psychometric properties and concurrent, construct and discriminant validity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4209084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42090842014-10-28 A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation Benson, Tim Potts, Henry WW BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key quality outcome for modern health services, but most existing survey methods are long and setting-specific. We identified the need for a short generic questionnaire for tracking patient experience. METHODS: We describe the development and validation of the howRwe questionnaire. This has two items relating to clinical care (treat you kindly; listen and explain) and two items relating to the organisation of care (see you promptly; well organised) as perceived by patients. Each item has four responses (excellent, good, fair and poor). The questionnaire was trialled in 828 patients in an orthopaedic pre-operative assessment clinic (PAC). RESULTS: The howRwe questionnaire is shorter (29 words) and more readable (Flesch-Kincaid grade score 2.2) than other questionnaires with broadly similar objectives. Psychometric properties in this sample are good with Cronbach’s α=0.82. Following a change to the appointments system in the clinic, howRwe showed improvement in promptness and organisation, but not in kindness and communication, showing that it can distinguish between the clinical and organisational aspects of patient experience. CONCLUSIONS: howRwe meets the criteria for a short generic patient experience questionnaire that is suitable for frequent use. In the validation study of PAC patients, it showed good psychometric properties and concurrent, construct and discriminant validity. BioMed Central 2014-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4209084/ /pubmed/25331177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z Text en © Benson and Potts; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Benson, Tim Potts, Henry WW A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation |
title | A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation |
title_full | A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation |
title_fullStr | A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation |
title_short | A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation |
title_sort | short generic patient experience questionnaire: howrwe development and validation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25331177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensontim ashortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation AT pottshenryww ashortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation AT bensontim shortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation AT pottshenryww shortgenericpatientexperiencequestionnairehowrwedevelopmentandvalidation |